Cited by 144Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceFree Will and AgencyTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Preserved Self-Awareness following Extensive Bilateral Brain Damage to the Insula, Anterior Cingulate, and Medial Prefrontal Cortices

Open access
Philippi, Carissa L., Feinstein, Justin S., Khalsa, Sahib S., Damasio, Antonio, Tranel, Daniel, Landini, Gregory, Williford, Kenneth, Rudrauf, David·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

It has been proposed that self-awareness (SA), a multifaceted phenomenon central to human consciousness, depends critically on specific brain regions, namely the insular cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Such a proposal predicts that damage to these regions should disrupt or even abolish SA. We tested this prediction in a rare neurological patient with extensive bilateral brain damage encompassing the insula, ACC, mPFC, and the medial temporal lobes. In spite of severe amnesia, which partially affected his "autobiographical self", the patient's SA remained fundamentally intact. His Core SA, including basic self-recognition and sense of self-agency, was preserved. His Extended SA and Introspective SA were also largely intact, as he has a stable self-concept and intact higher-order metacognitive abilities. The results suggest that the insular cortex, ACC and mPFC are not required for most aspects of SA. Our findings are compatible with the hypothesis that SA is likely to emerge from more distributed interactions among brain networks including those in the brainstem, thalamus, and posteromedial cortices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0038413

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Arguments for the subcortical basis of subjective experience in humans provide important convergent evidence for the role of a PI in subjective experience.

    “arguments for the subcortical basis of subjective experience in humans [16,40–43] provide important convergent evidence for the role of a PI in subjective experience [9,16].”

    From Phenomenal interface theory: a model for basal consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Introduction describes brainstem nuclei as a hypothesized basis for primordial feelings, and the Discussion says this hypothesis is compatible with the study’s findings. The Conclusion also includes the brainstem among regions involved in self-awareness. These passages support a subcortical contribution, but they do not establish a subcortical basis for subjective experience generally or connect the findings to the role of a PI. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Three recent case studies reported intact interoceptive awareness and self-awareness after bilateral insular lesions.

    “Three recent case studies specifically examined the effects of bilateral insular lesions on subjective awareness and reported intact interoceptive awareness (Khalsa et al., 2009) and self-awareness (Philippi et al., 2012; Damasio et al., 2013).”

    From Anterior insular cortex and emotional awareness (2013) · cites this paper as Philippi et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 123 · Cited by 144

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]Craig AD (2009) How do you feel: now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10: 12. 19096369

Authors
Philippi, C. L., Feinstein, J. S., Khalsa, S. S., Damasio, A., Tranel, D., Landini, G., Williford, K., & Rudrauf, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Corresponding author
  • Feinstein, Justin S.
  • Rudrauf, David
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-08-22
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
e38413
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981842242
Cited by
144
References
123
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRL - University of Missouri, St. Louis (University of Missouri–St. Louis) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Foundation
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA022549, R01DA022549)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01 NS19632, P01NS019632, NS-19632)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
self-awareness, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, amnesia, autobiographical self, self-recognition, self-agency, metacognition, self-concept, consciousness, distributed brain networks, posteromedial cortex, thalamus, brainstem
MeSH terms
Awareness, Behavior, Brain Injuries, Consciousness, Face, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Smell, Prefrontal Cortex, Recognition, Psychology, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review