CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Restoration Suitability Index Model for the Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) in the Mission-Aransas Estuary, TX, USA

Beseres Pollack, Jennifer, Cleveland, Andrew, Palmer, Terence A., Reisinger, Anthony S., Montagna, Paul A.·2012·PLoS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0040839PMC PMC3394728
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0040839

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Commercial oyster landings. Commercial oyster landings (metric tons) from the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico from 1950–2009 (NOAA 2011).
Figure 1 Commercial oyster landings. Commercial oyster landings (metric tons) from the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico from 1950–2009 (NOAA 2011).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Field sampling locations in the Mission-Aransas Estuary, TX, USA. Sampling locations for oysters (green), environmental variables (gray-blue), and P. marinus (white). Environmental variables were also measured at P. marinus and oyster sampling locations.
Figure 2 Field sampling locations in the Mission-Aransas Estuary, TX, USA. Sampling locations for oysters (green), environmental variables (gray-blue), and P. marinus (white). Environmental variables were also measured at P. marinus and oyster sampling locations.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Suitability index graphs for model variables. Relationship between actual values of environmental variables and their corresponding restoration suitability values for Crassostrea virginica; values of 1 are optimal, and values of 0 are unacceptable.
Figure 3 Suitability index graphs for model variables. Relationship between actual values of environmental variables and their corresponding restoration suitability values for Crassostrea virginica; values of 1 are optimal, and values of 0 are unacceptable.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Spatially interpolated environmental measurements in the Mission-Aransas Estuary, TX, USA. Mean (left column) and standard deviation (SD, right column) for salinity (sal; A and B), temperature (temp; C and D), and turbidity (turb; E and F). Frequency of dissolved oxygen <4 mg/l (G); and depth (H).
Figure 4 Spatially interpolated environmental measurements in the Mission-Aransas Estuary, TX, USA. Mean (left column) and standard deviation (SD, right column) for salinity (sal; A and B), temperature (temp; C and D), and turbidity (turb; E and F). Frequency of dissolved oxygen <4 mg/l (G); and depth (H).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Oyster condition on reefs in the Mission-Aransas Estuary, TX, USA. Mean number of A) live oysters (≥26 mm), B) dead oyster shells ≥26 mm, and C) spat (5–25 mm) collected using 30 second dredge (1986–2009).
Figure 5 Oyster condition on reefs in the Mission-Aransas Estuary, TX, USA. Mean number of A) live oysters (≥26 mm), B) dead oyster shells ≥26 mm, and C) spat (5–25 mm) collected using 30 second dredge (1986–2009).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Restoration suitability index and reef quality index. A) Restoration suitability index. Darker shading indicates higher index value. B) Reef quality index. Dark shading indicates higher index value. C) P. marinus disease levels: at each of 7 sampling stations, bar graphs illustrates percent infection and weighted prevalence for juvenile (<76 mm shell length; green-hued color bars) and commercial oysters (≤76 mm shell length; pink-hued bars).
Figure 6 Restoration suitability index and reef quality index. A) Restoration suitability index. Darker shading indicates higher index value. B) Reef quality index. Dark shading indicates higher index value. C) P. marinus disease levels: at each of 7 sampling stations, bar graphs illustrates percent infection and weighted prevalence for juvenile (<76 mm shell length; green-hued color bars) and commercial oysters (≤76 mm shell length; pink-hued bars).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Sensitivity analyses. Percent change from the restoration suitability index base model due to removal of individual normalized environmental variables, one at a time. Removal of: A) mean salinity, B) standard deviation (SD) salinity, C) mean temperature, D) SD temperature, E) mean turbidity, F) SD turbidity, G) frequency of low dissolved oxygen; H) depth.
Figure 7 Sensitivity analyses. Percent change from the restoration suitability index base model due to removal of individual normalized environmental variables, one at a time. Removal of: A) mean salinity, B) standard deviation (SD) salinity, C) mean temperature, D) SD temperature, E) mean turbidity, F) SD turbidity, G) frequency of low dissolved oxygen; H) depth.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. MW Beck, 2011, Oyster Reefs at Risk and Recommendations for Conservation, Restoration, and Management., Bioscience, 61, 107, 10.1525/bio.2011.61.2.5 · DOI
  2. Jr E Doran, 1965, Shell roads in Texas., Geographical review, 55, 223, 10.2307/212711 · DOI
  3. EN Powell, 1995, Modeling oyster populations. V. Declining phytoplankton stocks and the population dynamics of American oyster (Crassostrea virginica) populations., Fish Res, 24, 199, 10.1016/0165-7836(95)00370-P · DOI
  4. A Craig, 1989, Distribution of Perkinsus marinus in gulf coast oyster populations., Estuaries, 12, 82, 10.2307/1351499 · DOI
  5. N Williams, 2010, Gulf braced for the big clean-up., Current Biology, 20, R613, 10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.019 · DOI
  6. DL Breitburg, 2000, Oyster reef restoration: convergence of harvest and conservation strategies., J Shellfish Res, 19, 371
  7. DM Schulte, 2009, Unprecedented restoration of a native oyster metapopulation., Science, 325, 1124, 10.1126/science.1176516 · DOI
  8. TM Soniat, 1988, Field validation of a habitat suitability index model for the American oyster., Estuaries, 11(2), 87, 10.2307/1351995 · DOI
  9. JL Curnutt, 2000, Landscape-based spatially explicit species index models for Everglades restoration., Ecol Appl, 10(6), 1849, 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1849:LBSESI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  10. SK Brown, 2000, Habitat suitability index models for eight fish and invertebrate species in Casco and Sheepscot Bays, Maine., N Am J Fish Manage, 20, 408, 10.1577/1548-8675(2000)020<0408:HSIMFE>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  11. TA Battista, 1999, Habitat suitability index model for the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica, in the Chesapeake Bay: A geographic information system approach. M.S. Thesis.
  12. TK Barnes, 2007, A habitat suitability index model for the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica), a tool for restoration of the Caloosahatchee Estuary, Florida., J Shellfish Res, 26(4), 949, 10.2983/0730-8000(2007)26[949:AHSIMF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  13. A Starke, 2011, Restoration of Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin) to the Hudson River. USA: A spatiotemporal modeling approach., J Shellfish Res, 30(3), 671, 10.2983/035.030.0309 · DOI
  14. EN Powell, 2007, Reevaluation of eastern oyster dredge efficiency in survey mode: Application in stock assessment., North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 27, 492, 10.1577/M04-205.1 · DOI
  15. SM Ray, 1966, A review of the culture method for detecting Dermocystidium marinum, with suggested modifications and precautions., Proc Natl Shellfish Assoc, 54, 55
  16. J Mackin, 1962, Oyster disease caused by Dermocystidium marinum and other microorganisms in Louisiana., Publications of the Institute of Marine Science of the University of Texas, 7, 132
  17. A Craig, 1989, Distribution of Perkinsus marinus in Gulf coast oyster populations., Estuaries, 12, 82, 10.2307/1351499 · DOI
  18. A Gribov, 2011, Local polynomials for data detrending and interpolation in the presence of barriers., Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess, 25, 1057, 10.1007/s00477-011-0488-2 · DOI
  19. EW Cake, 1983, Habitat suitability index models: Gulf of Mexico American oyster., U.S. Dept Int Fish Wildl Serv, FWS/OBS-82/10, 37
  20. A Villalba, 2004, Perkinsosis in molluscs: a review., Aquatic Living Resources, 17, 411, 10.1051/alr:2004050 · DOI
  21. JD Andrews, 1988, Management strategies to control the disease caused by Perkinsus marinus., Am Fish Soc Spec Pub, 18, 257
  22. J Carlsson, 2008, Evaluating recruitment contribution of a selectively bred aquaculture line of the oyster, Crassostrea virginica used in restoration efforts., J Shellfish Res, 27(5), 1117, 10.2983/0730-8000-27.5.1117 · DOI
  23. VG Economio, 2005, Performance of “natural Dermo-resistant” oyster stocks – survival, disease, growth, condition, and energy reserves., J Shellfish Res, 24(1), 143
  24. RW Menzel, 1958, Causes of depletion of oysters in St. Vincent Bay, Apalachicola Bay, Florida., Proc Natl Shellfish Assoc, 48, 66
  25. CL MacKenzie Jr, 1977, Development of an aquaculture program for rehabilitation of damaged oyster reefs in Mississippi., US Fish Wildl Serv Mar Fish Rev, 39, 1
  26. TM Soniat, 1996, Epizootiology of Perkinsus marinus disease of eastern oysters in the Gulf of Mexico., Journal of Shellfish Research, 17, 1149
  27. VL Loosanoff, 1953, Behavior of oysters in water of low salinities., Proc Natl Shellfish Assoc, 43, 135
  28. RL Allen, 1989, Environmental influences on the oyster industry along the west coast of Florida., J Shellfish Res, 8, 95
  29. RJ Livingston, 1997, Freshwater input to a gulf estuary: Long-term control of trophic organization., Ecol Appl, 7, 277, 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0277:FITAGE]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  30. J Levinton, 2011, Climate change, precipitation and impacts on an estuarine refuge from disease., PLoS ONE, 6, e18849, 10.1371/journal.pone.0018849 · DOI
  31. FLE Chu, 1996, Laboratory investigations of susceptibility, infectivity and transmission of Perkinsus marinus in oysters., J Shellfish Res, 15, 57
  32. J Widdows, 1989, Effects of hypoxia and anoxia on survival, energy metabolism, and feeding of oyster larvae (Crassostrea virginica, Gmelin)., Biol Bull, 177, 154, 10.2307/1541843 · DOI
  33. HS Lenihan, 1998, How habitat degradation through fishery disturbance enhances impacts of hypoxia on oyster reefs., Ecological Applications, 8, 128, 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0128:HHDTFD]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  34. VL Loosanoff, 1948, Effects of turbidity on feeding of oysters., Proc Natl Shellfish Assoc, 1947, 40
  35. RW Smith, 2001, Benthic response index for assessing infaunal communities on the southern California mainland shelf., Ecol Appl, 11, 1073, 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1073:BRIFAI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  36. YC Allen, 2005, High resolution mapping and classification of oyster habitats in nearshore Louisiana using sidescan sonar., Estuaries, 28, 435, 10.1007/BF02693925 · DOI
  37. RE Grizzle, 2005, Mapping and characterizing subtidal oyster reefs using acoustic techniques, underwater videography, and quadrat counts., American Fisheries Society Symposium, 41, 153
  38. RJ Kennedy, 1999, A survey of the current status of the flat oyster (Ostrea edulis) in Stangford Lough, Northern Ireland., Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 99B, 79

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 66

Metadata

Authors
Beseres Pollack, J., Cleveland, A., Palmer, T. A., Reisinger, A. S., & Montagna, P. A.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2012-07-11
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
e40839
ISSN
1932-6203
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0040839
PMC
PMC3394728
Cited by
66
References
1
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Restoration Suitability Index Model for the Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) in the Mission-Aransas Estuary, TX, USA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0040839
The paper
Beseres Pollack, J., Cleveland, A., Palmer, T. A., Reisinger, A. S., & Montagna, P. A. (2012). A Restoration Suitability Index Model for the Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) in the Mission-Aransas Estuary, TX, USA. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040839