Cited by 275Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesDown syndrome and intellectual disability research

Autism Spectrum Disorders in the Stockholm Youth Cohort: Design, Prevalence and Validity

Open access
Idring, Selma, Rai, Dheeraj, Dal, Henrik, Dalman, Christina, Sturm, Harald, Zander, Eric, Lee, Brian K., Serlachius, Eva +1 more·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reports of rising prevalence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD), along with their profound personal and societal burden, emphasize the need of methodologically sound studies to explore their causes and consequences. We here present the design of a large intergenerational resource for ASD research, along with population-based prevalence estimates of ASD and their diagnostic validity. METHOD: The Stockholm Youth Cohort is a record-linkage study comprising all individuals aged 0-17 years, ever resident in Stockholm County in 2001-2007 (N = 589,114). ASD cases (N = 5,100) were identified using a multisource approach, involving registers covering all pathways to ASD diagnosis and care, and categorized according to co-morbid intellectual disability. Prospectively recorded information on potential determinants and consequences of ASD were retrieved from national and regional health and administrative registers. Case ascertainment was validated through case-note review, and cross validation with co-existing cases in a national twin study. RESULTS: The 2007 year prevalence of ASD in all children and young people was 11.5 per 1,000 (95% confidence interval 11.2-11.8), with a co-morbid intellectual disability recorded in 42.6% (41.0-44.2) of cases. We found 96.0% (92.0-98.4) of reviewed case-notes being consistent with a diagnosis of ASD, and confirmed ASD in 85.2% (66.2-95.8) of affected twins. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this contemporary study accords with recently reported prevalence estimates from Western countries at around 1%, based on valid case ascertainment. The Stockholm Youth Cohort, in light of the availability of extensive information from Sweden's registers, constitutes an important resource for ASD research. On-going work, including collection of biological samples, will enrich the study further.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0041280

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent community-based ascertainment initiatives have yielded male:female ratios lower than 3:1 among Asian and European children.

    “However, recent community-based ascertainment initiatives have yielded ratios lower than 3:1 among Asian [5, 6] and European [7] children,”
  • The 3.18:1 increased odds of ASD in males in the current sample (95% CI = 2.31 to 4.39) is similar to estimates from community-based ascertainment of children (2.5:1-2.6:1) and to a previous report on approximately half of the current high-risk sample.

    “The 3.18:1 increased odds of ASD in males in the current sample (95 % CI = 2.31 to 4.39) is similar to estimates from community-based ascertainment of children (2.5:1–2.6:1) [5–7], as well as to a previous report on approximately half of the current high-risk sample [10].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 275

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]World Health Organisation 1978 International Classification of diseases, 9th edition. Geneva: World Health Organisation

Authors
Idring, S., Rai, D., Dal, H., Dalman, C., Sturm, H., Zander, E., Lee, B. K., Serlachius, E., & Magnusson, C.
Affiliations
  • Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust (GB)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Region Stockholm (SE)
  • Drexel University (US)
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-07-20
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
e41280
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998337942
Cited by
275
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
Stockholms Läns Landsting
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, prevalence, diagnostic validity, case ascertainment, data linkage, twin studies, children and young people
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Sweden, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review