Cited by 50Spatial Cognition and NavigationMemory and Neural MechanismsGeography Education and Pedagogy

Differential Recruitment of Brain Networks following Route and Cartographic Map Learning of Spatial Environments

Open access
Zhang, Hui, Copara, Milagros, Ekstrom, Arne D.·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

An extensive neuroimaging literature has helped characterize the brain regions involved in navigating a spatial environment. Far less is known, however, about the brain networks involved when learning a spatial layout from a cartographic map. To compare the two means of acquiring a spatial representation, participants learned spatial environments either by directly navigating them or learning them from an aerial-view map. While undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), participants then performed two different tasks to assess knowledge of the spatial environment: a scene and orientation dependent perceptual (SOP) pointing task and a judgment of relative direction (JRD) of landmarks pointing task. We found three brain regions showing significant effects of route vs. map learning during the two tasks. Parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortex showed greater activation following route compared to map learning during the JRD but not SOP task while inferior frontal gyrus showed greater activation following map compared to route learning during the SOP but not JRD task. We interpret our results to suggest that parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortex were involved in translating scene and orientation dependent coordinate information acquired during route learning to a landmark-referenced representation while inferior frontal gyrus played a role in converting primarily landmark-referenced coordinates acquired during map learning to a scene and orientation dependent coordinate system. Together, our results provide novel insight into the different brain networks underlying spatial representations formed during navigation vs. cartographic map learning and provide additional constraints on theoretical models of the neural basis of human spatial representation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0044886

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RSC response is increased when subjects retrieve spatial information, perform JRD tasks from memory, or move through an environment for which they have obtained survey knowledge.

    “Moreover, its response is increased when subjects retrieve spatial information25, 26, perform JRD tasks from memory27, or move through an environment for which they have obtained survey knowledge28.”
  • RSC is strongly activated when imagining changes in one's viewpoint or when retrieving spatial relationships following first-person navigation.

    “This conclusion is consistent with previous work indicating that RSC is strongly activated when imagining changes in one’s viewpoint50 or when retrieving spatial relationships following first-person navigation27.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 50

Authors
Zhang, H., Copara, M., & Ekstrom, A. D.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Ekstrom, Arne D.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-09-18
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
e44886
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022099781
Cited by
50
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geography Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
route learning, map learning, spatial navigation, spatial representation, parahippocampal cortex, retrosplenial cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, coordinate systems, brain networks
MeSH terms
Brain, Female, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Nerve Net, Orientation, Spatial Behavior, Functional Neuroimaging, Geographic Mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review