Differential Recruitment of Brain Networks following Route and Cartographic Map Learning of Spatial Environments
Open accessAbstract
An extensive neuroimaging literature has helped characterize the brain regions involved in navigating a spatial environment. Far less is known, however, about the brain networks involved when learning a spatial layout from a cartographic map. To compare the two means of acquiring a spatial representation, participants learned spatial environments either by directly navigating them or learning them from an aerial-view map. While undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), participants then performed two different tasks to assess knowledge of the spatial environment: a scene and orientation dependent perceptual (SOP) pointing task and a judgment of relative direction (JRD) of landmarks pointing task. We found three brain regions showing significant effects of route vs. map learning during the two tasks. Parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortex showed greater activation following route compared to map learning during the JRD but not SOP task while inferior frontal gyrus showed greater activation following map compared to route learning during the SOP but not JRD task. We interpret our results to suggest that parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortex were involved in translating scene and orientation dependent coordinate information acquired during route learning to a landmark-referenced representation while inferior frontal gyrus played a role in converting primarily landmark-referenced coordinates acquired during map learning to a scene and orientation dependent coordinate system. Together, our results provide novel insight into the different brain networks underlying spatial representations formed during navigation vs. cartographic map learning and provide additional constraints on theoretical models of the neural basis of human spatial representation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RSC response is increased when subjects retrieve spatial information, perform JRD tasks from memory, or move through an environment for which they have obtained survey knowledge.
“Moreover, its response is increased when subjects retrieve spatial information25, 26, perform JRD tasks from memory27, or move through an environment for which they have obtained survey knowledge28.”
From Anchoring the neural compass: coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
RSC is strongly activated when imagining changes in one's viewpoint or when retrieving spatial relationships following first-person navigation.
“This conclusion is consistent with previous work indicating that RSC is strongly activated when imagining changes in one’s viewpoint50 or when retrieving spatial relationships following first-person navigation27.”
From Anchoring the neural compass: coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Zhang, H., Copara, M., & Ekstrom, A. D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ekstrom, Arne D.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-09-18
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e44886
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3445610
- OpenAlex
- W2022099781
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geography Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- route learning, map learning, spatial navigation, spatial representation, parahippocampal cortex, retrosplenial cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, coordinate systems, brain networks
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Female, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Nerve Net, Orientation, Spatial Behavior, Functional Neuroimaging, Geographic Mapping
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review