The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Timing Matters in Hip Fracture Surgery: Patients Operated within 48 Hours Have Better Outcomes. A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of over 190,000 Patients
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: To assess the relationship between surgical delay and mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture. Systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies published from 1948 to 2011. Medline (from 1948), Embase (from 1974) and CINAHL (from 1982), and the Cochrane Library. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals for each study were extracted and pooled with a random effects model. Heterogeneity, publication bias, bayesian analysis, and meta-regression analyses were done. Criteria for inclusion were retro- and prospective elderly population studies, patients with operated hip fractures, indication of timing of surgery and survival status. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: There were 35 independent studies, with 191,873 participants and 34,448 deaths. The majority considered a cut-off between 24 and 48 hours. Early hip surgery was associated with a lower risk of death (pooled odds ratio (OR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67 to 0.81; P<0.000) and pressure sores (0.48, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.60; P<0.000). Meta-analysis of the adjusted prospective studies gave similar results. The bayesian probability predicted that about 20% of future studies might find that early surgery is not beneficial for decreasing mortality. None of the confounders (e.g. age, sex, data source, baseline risk, cut-off points, study location, quality and year) explained the differences between studies. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Surgical delay is associated with a significant increase in the risk of death and pressure sores. Conservative timing strategies should be avoided. Orthopaedic surgery services should ensure the majority of patients are operated within one or two days.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies
Higgins, J. P., & Altman, D. G. (2008) · Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions · doi:10.1002/9780470712184.ch8 · Cited by 3,396
A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2009) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2008.00552.x · Cited by 2,569
A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints
Harbord, R. M., Egger, M., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2006) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.2380 · Cited by 2,267 · cited 2×
“Nevertheless Harbord’s test was not statistically significant (P = 0.173).”
MethodInfluentialPeters, J. L., Sutton, A. J., Jones, D. R., Abrams, K. R., & Rushton, L. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010 · Cited by 2,053
Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes
Mehta, S. R., Granger, C. B., Boden, W. E., Steg, P. G., Bassand, J.-P., Faxon, D. P., Afzal, R., Chrolavicius, S., Jolly, S. S., Widimsky, P., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0807986 · Cited by 925
Synthesis of observational studies should consider credibility ceilings
Salanti, G., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.014 · Cited by 108 · cited 1×
“Second, we used credibility ceilings, a technique which assumes that methodological limitations implicit in included observational studies cannot give us more than a maximum certainty that an effect is in a particular direction and not null or in the other direction [24].”
MethodSelf-citation
Cited by
Association Between Wait Time and 30-Day Mortality in Adults Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery
Pincus, D., Ravi, B., Wasserstein, D., Huang, A., Paterson, J. M., Nathens, A. B., Kreder, H. J., Jenkinson, R. J., & Wodchis, W. P. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.17606 · Cited by 709
Abraham, J., Bartek, B., Meng, A., Ryan King, C., Xue, B., Lu, C., & Avidan, M. S. (2023) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104270 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Moja, L., Piatti, A., Pecoraro, V., Ricci, C., Virgili, G., Salanti, G., Germagnoli, L., Liberati, A., & Banfi, G.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-10-03
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e46175
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008921114
- Cited by
- 644
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Timing Matters in Hip Fracture Surgery: Patients Operated within 48 Hours Have Better Outcomes. A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of over 190,000 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0046175
- The paper
- Moja, L., Piatti, A., Pecoraro, V., Ricci, C., Virgili, G., Salanti, G., Germagnoli, L., Liberati, A., & Banfi, G. (2012). Timing Matters in Hip Fracture Surgery: Patients Operated within 48 Hours Have Better Outcomes. A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of over 190,000 Patients. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046175
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.