Cited by 335Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesAlgorithms and Data CompressionSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Improving PacBio Long Read Accuracy by Short Read Alignment

Open access
Au, Kin Fai, Underwood, Jason G., Lee, Lawrence, Wong, Wing Hung·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The recent development of third generation sequencing (TGS) generates much longer reads than second generation sequencing (SGS) and thus provides a chance to solve problems that are difficult to study through SGS alone. However, higher raw read error rates are an intrinsic drawback in most TGS technologies. Here we present a computational method, LSC, to perform error correction of TGS long reads (LR) by SGS short reads (SR). Aiming to reduce the error rate in homopolymer runs in the main TGS platform, the PacBio® RS, LSC applies a homopolymer compression (HC) transformation strategy to increase the sensitivity of SR-LR alignment without scarifying alignment accuracy. We applied LSC to 100,000 PacBio long reads from human brain cerebellum RNA-seq data and 64 million single-end 75 bp reads from human brain RNA-seq data. The results show LSC can correct PacBio long reads to reduce the error rate by more than 3 folds. The improved accuracy greatly benefits many downstream analyses, such as directional gene isoform detection in RNA-seq study. Compared with another hybrid correction tool, LSC can achieve over double the sensitivity and similar specificity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0046679

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long-read sequencing has limitations, including a still high error rate that limits de novo transcript identification and forces reliance on the reference genome.

    “Nevertheless, long-read sequencing has its own set of limitations, such as a still high error rate that limits de novo transcript identifications and forces the technology to leverage the reference genome [188].”

    From A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [188]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 8 · Cited by 335

Authors
Au, K. F., Underwood, J. G., Lee, L., & Wong, W. H.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Pacific Biosciences (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Wong, Wing Hung
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-10-04
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
e46679
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041126213
Cited by
335
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG005717)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD057970)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
PacBio long reads, long-read error correction, hybrid sequencing, short-read alignment, long-read sequencing, RNA-seq, leukemia stem cells
MeSH terms
Software, Reproducibility of Results, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review