Smooth pursuit and visual occlusion: active inference and oculomotor control in schizophrenia
Open accessAbstract
This paper introduces a model of oculomotor control during the smooth pursuit of occluded visual targets. This model is based upon active inference, in which subjects try to minimise their (proprioceptive) prediction error based upon posterior beliefs about the hidden causes of their (exteroceptive) sensory input. Our model appeals to a single principle--the minimisation of variational free energy--to provide Bayes optimal solutions to the smooth pursuit problem. However, it tries to accommodate the cardinal features of smooth pursuit of partially occluded targets that have been observed empirically in normal subjects and schizophrenia. Specifically, we account for the ability of normal subjects to anticipate periodic target trajectories and emit pre-emptive smooth pursuit eye movements--prior to the emergence of a target from behind an occluder. Furthermore, we show that a single deficit in the postsynaptic gain of prediction error units (encoding the precision of posterior beliefs) can account for several features of smooth pursuit in schizophrenia: namely, a reduction in motor gain and anticipatory eye movements during visual occlusion, a paradoxical improvement in tracking unpredicted deviations from target trajectories and a failure to recognise and exploit regularities in the periodic motion of visual targets. This model will form the basis of subsequent (dynamic causal) models of empirical eye tracking measurements, which we hope to validate, using psychopharmacology and studies of schizophrenia.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Psychotic symptoms can be explained in terms of a failure to represent precision regarding beliefs about the world.
“The suggestion is that psychotic symptoms can be explained in terms of a failure to represent precision regarding beliefs about the world (Adams et al., 2012, Adams et al., 2013)”
From The functional anatomy of schizophrenia: A dynamic causal modeling study of predictive coding (2014) · cites this paper as Adams et al., 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 98 · Cited by 91
- Authors
- Adams, R. A., Perrinet, L. U., & Friston, K.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Adams, Rick A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-10-26
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e47502
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3482214
- OpenAlex
- W2092383562
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (088130, 088130/Z/09/Z)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- smooth pursuit eye movements, visual occlusion, active inference, free energy principle, oculomotor control, schizophrenia, prediction error, anticipatory eye movements
- MeSH terms
- Bayes Theorem, Eye Movements, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Motion Perception, Pursuit, Smooth, Schizophrenia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review