Cited by 39Fungal and yeast genetics researchAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

Gross karyotypic and phenotypic alterations among different progenies of the Candida glabrata CBS138/ATCC2001 reference strain

Open access
Bader, Oliver, Schwarz, Alexander, Kraneveld, Eefje A., Tangwattanchuleeporn, Marut, Schmidt, Pia, Jacobsen, Mette D., Gross, Uwe, De Groot, Piet W. J. +1 more·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Genomic plasticity is a mechanism for adaptation to environmental cues such as host responses and antifungal drug pressure in many fungi including the human pathogenic yeast Candida glabrata. In this study we evaluated the phenotypic and genotypic stability of the world-wide used C. glabrata reference strain CBS138/ATCC2001 under laboratory conditions. A set of ten lineages of this wild type strain and genetically modified progenies were obtained from different scientific laboratories, and analyzed for genotypic and phenotypic alterations. Even though the derivates were indistinguishable by multi locus sequence typing, different phenotypic groups that correlated with specific karyotypic changes were observed. In addition, modifications in the adherence capacity to plastic surface emerged that were shown to correlate with quantitative changes in adhesin gene expression rather than subtelomeric gene loss or differences in the number of macrosatellite repeats within adhesin genes. These results confirm the genomic plasticity of C. glabrata and show that chromosomal aberrations and functional adaptations may occur not only during infection and under antimicrobial therapy, but also under laboratory conditions without extreme selective pressures. These alterations can significantly affect phenotypic properties such as cell surface attributes including adhesion and the cell wall carbohydrate composition and therefore, if unnoticed, may adulterate the outcome of genetic studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0052218

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The C. glabrata genome shows plasticity, and alterations in karyotype and chromosome size have been observed in clinical isolates and the reference strain CBS138.

    “The C. glabrata genome shows plasticity, and alterations in karyotype and chromosome size have been observed in clinical isolates and the reference strain CBS138 [19,20,21].”

    From Candida glabrata: A Lot More Than Meets the Eye (2019) · cites this paper as [20]

  • Chromosomal aberrations were also observed in the same world-wide used C. glabrata reference strain obtained from various laboratories and cultivated under non-stressful conditions.

    “Yet, chromosomal aberrations were also observed in the same world-wide used C. glabrata reference strain obtained from various laboratories and cultivated under non-stressful conditions [131].”
  • High karyotypic variability among C. glabrata strains prevents using the reference strain CBS138 genomic sequence as a template for assembling sequences of other strains, including clinical isolates.

    “Indeed, while the genome of a reference C. glabrata laboratory strain (CBS138) has been sequenced, we were not able to use that strain's genomic sequence as a template for assembling the sequences of other strains, e.g., various clinical isolates, due to the high karyotypic variability among strains (Muller et al., 2009; Polakova et al., 2009; Bader et al., 2012; Figure 1B).”

    From Genetic Drivers of Multidrug Resistance in Candida glabrata (2016) · cites this paper as Bader et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 39

Authors
Bader, O., Schwarz, A., Kraneveld, E. A., Tangwattanchuleeporn, M., Schmidt, P., Jacobsen, M. D., Gross, U., De Groot, P. W. J., & Weig, M.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
  • Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Weig, Michael
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-12-20
Volume
7
Issue
12
Pages
e52218
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016306656
Cited by
39
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/F00513X/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
Candida glabrata, genome plasticity, karyotype abnormalities, chromosomal abnormalities, strain stability, cell wall carbohydrates, genetic admixture, multilocus sequence typing
MeSH terms
Fungal Proteins, Karyotyping, Genome, Fungal, Candida glabrata

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review