Cited by 138Remote Sensing in AgricultureBamboo properties and applicationsPlant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics

Bamboo-Dominated Forests of the Southwest Amazon: Detection, Spatial Extent, Life Cycle Length and Flowering Waves

Open access
Carvalho, Anelena L. de, Nelson, Bruce W., Bianchini, Milton C., Plagnol, Daniela, Kuplich, Tatiana M., Daly, Douglas C.·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

We map the extent, infer the life-cycle length and describe spatial and temporal patterns of flowering of sarmentose bamboos (Guadua spp) in upland forests of the southwest Amazon. We first examine the spectra and the spectral separation of forests with different bamboo life stages. False-color composites from orbital sensors going back to 1975 are capable of distinguishing life stages. These woody bamboos flower produce massive quantities of seeds and then die. Life stage is synchronized, forming a single cohort within each population. Bamboo dominates at least 161,500 km(2) of forest, coincident with an area of recent or ongoing tectonic uplift, rapid mechanical erosion and poorly drained soils rich in exchangeable cations. Each bamboo population is confined to a single spatially continuous patch or to a core patch with small outliers. Using spatial congruence between pairs of mature-stage maps from different years, we estimate an average life cycle of 27-28 y. It is now possible to predict exactly where and approximately when new bamboo mortality events will occur. We also map 74 bamboo populations that flowered between 2001 and 2008 over the entire domain of bamboo-dominated forest. Population size averaged 330 km(2). Flowering events of these populations are temporally and/or spatially separated, restricting or preventing gene exchange. Nonetheless, adjacent populations flower closer in time than expected by chance, forming flowering waves. This may be a consequence of allochronic divergence from fewer ancestral populations and suggests a long history of widespread bamboo in the southwest Amazon.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0054852

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [1]Griscom BW, Ashton PMS (2006) A self-perpetuating bamboo disturbance cycle in a neotropical forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 22: 587– 597.
  2. [2]Singh A (1987) Spectral separability of tropical forest cover classes. International Journal of Remote Sensing 8: 971– 979.
  3. [6]Hill RA (1999) Image segmentation for humid tropical forest classification in Landsat TM data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 20: 1039– 1044.
  4. [9]Smith M, Nelson BW (2011) Fire favours expansion of bamboo-dominated forests in the south-west Amazon. Journal of Tropical Ecology 27: 59– 64.
  5. [10]Barlow J, Silveira JM, Mestre LAM, Andrade RB, D’Andrea GC, et al (2012) Wildfires in bamboo-dominated Amazonian forest: impacts on above-ground biomass and biodiversity. PLoS ONE 7: e33373. 22428035 PMC3302859
  6. [13]Räsänen ME, Salo JS, Kalliola RJ (1987) Fluvial perturbance in the western Amazon Basin: regulation by long-term sub-Andean tectonics. Science 238: 1398– 1401. 17800567
  7. [18]Räsänen ME, Linna AM, Santos JCR, Negri FR (1995) Late Miocene Tidal Deposits in the Amazonian Foreland Basin. Science 269: 386– 390. 17841262
  8. [20]Higgins MA, Ruokolainen K, Tuomisto H, Llerena N, Cardenas G, et al (2011) Geological control of floristic composition in Amazonian forests. Journal of Biogeography 38: 2136– 2149. 22247585 PMC3253337
  9. [22]Franklin DC (2004) Synchrony and asynchrony: observations and hypotheses for the flowering wave in a long-lived semelparous bamboo. Journal of Biogeography 31: 773– 786.
  10. [25]Keeley JE, Bond WJ (1999) Mast flowering and semelparity in bamboos: the bamboo fire cycle hypothesis. The American Naturalist 154: 383– 391. 10506551
  11. [27]Janzen DH (1976) Why bamboos wait so long to flower. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 7: 347– 391.
  12. [28]Cooley JR, Simon C, Marshall DC, Slon K, Ehrhardt C (2001) Allochronic speciation, secondary contact, and reproductive character displacement in periodical cicadas (Hemiptera: Magicicada spp.): genetic, morphological, and behavioural evidence. Molecular Ecology 10: 661– 671. 11298977
  13. [29]Williams KS, Simon C (1995) The ecology, behavior and evolution of periodical cicadas. Annual Review of Entomology 40: 36.
  14. [31]Asner GP, Knapp DE, Balaji A, Paez-Acosta G (2009) Automated mapping of tropical deforestation and forest degradation: CLASlite. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 3: 033543.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carvalho, A. L. D., Nelson, B. W., Bianchini, M. C., Plagnol, D., Kuplich, T. M., & Daly, D. C.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (BR)
  • Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR)
  • New York Botanical Garden (US)
Corresponding author
Nelson, Bruce W.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-01-24
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
e54852
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072100884
Cited by
138
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Biblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • Carnegie Institution of Washington
  • Michigan State University
  • University of Washington
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Petrobras
  • Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia
  • U.S. Geological Survey
  • College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Bamboo properties and applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Keywords
Guadua, bamboo flowering, upland forests, satellite remote sensing, false color composite, population size, gene flow, tectonic uplift, soil cations
MeSH terms
Geography, South America, Trees, Cluster Analysis, Bambusa, Flowers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review