Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 821

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SLAF-seq: An Efficient Method of Large-Scale De Novo SNP Discovery and Genotyping Using High-Throughput Sequencing

Open access
Sun, Xiaowen, Liu, Dongyuan, Zhang, Xiaofeng, Li, Wenbin, Liu, Hui, Hong, Weiguo, Jiang, Chuanbei, Guan, Ning, Ma, Chouxian, Zeng, Huaping, Xu, Chunhua, Song, Jun, Huang, Long, Wang, Chunmei, Shi, Junjie, Wang, Rui, Zheng, Xianhu, Lu, Cuiyun, Wang, Xiaowu, Zheng, Hongkun·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Large-scale genotyping plays an important role in genetic association studies. It has provided new opportunities for gene discovery, especially when combined with high-throughput sequencing technologies. Here, we report an efficient solution for large-scale genotyping. We call it specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq). SLAF-seq technology has several distinguishing characteristics: i) deep sequencing to ensure genotyping accuracy; ii) reduced representation strategy to reduce sequencing costs; iii) pre-designed reduced representation scheme to optimize marker efficiency; and iv) double barcode system for large populations. In this study, we tested the efficiency of SLAF-seq on rice and soybean data. Both sets of results showed strong consistency between predicted and practical SLAFs and considerable genotyping accuracy. We also report the highest density genetic map yet created for any organism without a reference genome sequence, common carp in this case, using SLAF-seq data. We detected 50,530 high-quality SLAFs with 13,291 SNPs genotyped in 211 individual carp. The genetic map contained 5,885 markers with 0.68 cM intervals on average. A comparative genomics study between common carp genetic map and zebrafish genome sequence map showed high-quality SLAF-seq genotyping results. SLAF-seq provides a high-resolution strategy for large-scale genotyping and can be generally applicable to various species and populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0058700

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Metadata

Authors
Sun, X., Liu, D., Zhang, X., Li, W., Liu, H., Hong, W., Jiang, C., Guan, N., Ma, C., Zeng, H., Xu, C., Song, J., Huang, L., Wang, C., Shi, J., Wang, R., Zheng, X., Lu, C., Wang, X., & Zheng, H.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-03-19
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
e58700
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998790418
Cited by
821
References
5
FWCI
21.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SLAF-seq: An Efficient Method of Large-Scale De Novo SNP Discovery and Genotyping Using High-Throughput Sequencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0058700
The paper
Sun, X., Liu, D., Zhang, X., Li, W., Liu, H., Hong, W., Jiang, C., Guan, N., Ma, C., Zeng, H., Xu, C., Song, J., Huang, L., Wang, C., Shi, J., Wang, R., Zheng, X., Lu, C., Wang, X., & Zheng, H. (2013). SLAF-seq: An Efficient Method of Large-Scale De Novo SNP Discovery and Genotyping Using High-Throughput Sequencing. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058700

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.