Cited by 95Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Glutamate concentration in the medial prefrontal cortex predicts resting-state cortical-subcortical functional connectivity in humans

Open access
Duncan, Niall W., Wiebking, Christine, Tiret, Brice, Marjańska, Malgoranza, Hayes, Dave J., Lyttleton, Oliver, Doyon, Julien, Northoff, Georg·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Communication between cortical and subcortical regions is integral to a wide range of psychological processes and has been implicated in a number of psychiatric conditions. Studies in animals have provided insight into the biochemical and connectivity processes underlying such communication. However, to date no experiments that link these factors in humans in vivo have been carried out. To investigate the role of glutamate in individual differences in communication between the cortex--specifically the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC)--and subcortical regions in humans, a combination of resting-state fMRI, DTI and MRS was performed. The subcortical target regions were the nucleus accumbens (NAc), dorsomedial thalamus (DMT), and periaqueductal grey (PAG). It was found that functional connectivity between the mPFC and each of the NAc and DMT was positively correlated with mPFC glutamate concentrations, whilst functional connectivity between the mPFC and PAG was negatively correlated with glutamate concentration. The correlations involving mPFC glutamate and FC between the mPFC and each of the DMT and PAG were mirrored by correlations with structural connectivity, providing evidence that the glutamatergic relationship may, in part, be due to direct connectivity. These results are in agreement with existing results from animal studies and may have relevance for MDD and schizophrenia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0060312

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are associations between glutamate concentration and fronto-limbic functional connectivity.

    “and associations between glutamate concentration and fronto-limbic functional connectivity (Duncan et al. 2013).”

    From Circuit Mechanisms of Reward, Anhedonia, and Depression (2019) · cites this paper as Duncan et al. 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 124 · Cited by 95

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [44]Mescher M, Gruetter R, Merkle H, Garwood M (1996) Water suppression using selective echo dephasing. Proceedings of the ISMRM 4th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition. p. 384.
  2. [57]Wang R, Benner T, Sorensen AG, Wedeen VJ (2007) Diffusion Toolkit?: A Software Package for Diffusion Imaging Data Processing and Tractography. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. Vol. 15. p. 3720.

Authors
Duncan, N. W., Wiebking, C., Tiret, B., Marjańska, M., Hayes, D. J., Lyttleton, O., Doyon, J., & Northoff, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Duncan, Niall W.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-04-03
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
e60312
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965836880
Cited by
95
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Minnesota (P41 EB015894)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NCC P30 NS057091, P30NS076408, P30NS057091)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB015894, P41EB015894)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 008079, P41RR008079)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
glutamate, medial prefrontal cortex, resting-state functional connectivity, cortical-subcortical connectivity, nucleus accumbens, dorsomedial thalamic nucleus, periaqueductal gray, structural connectivity, individual differences, glutamatergic neurotransmission, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Periaqueductal Gray, Rest, Prefrontal Cortex, Neurotransmitter Agents, Glutamic Acid, Young Adult, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review