Cited by 37Visual perception and processing mechanismsSchizophrenia research and treatmentHallucinations in medical conditions

Reduced crowding and poor contour detection in schizophrenia are consistent with weak surround inhibition

Open access
Robol, Valentina, Tibber, Marc S., Anderson, Elaine J., Bobin, Tracy, Carlin, Patricia, Shergill, Sukhwinder S., Dakin, Steven C.·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Detection of visual contours (strings of small oriented elements) is markedly poor in schizophrenia. This has previously been attributed to an inability to group local information across space into a global percept. Here, we show that this failure actually originates from a combination of poor encoding of local orientation and abnormal processing of visual context. METHODS: We measured the ability of observers with schizophrenia to localise contours embedded in backgrounds of differently oriented elements (either randomly oriented, near-parallel or near-perpendicular to the contour). In addition, we measured patients' ability to process local orientation information (i.e., report the orientation of an individual element) for both isolated and crowded elements (i.e., presented with nearby distractors). RESULTS: While patients are poor at detecting contours amongst randomly oriented elements, they are proportionally less disrupted (compared to unaffected controls) when contour and surrounding elements have similar orientations (near-parallel condition). In addition, patients are poor at reporting the orientation of an individual element but, again, are less prone to interference from nearby distractors, a phenomenon known as visual crowding. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that patients' poor performance at contour perception arises not as a consequence of an "integration deficit" but from a combination of reduced sensitivity to local orientation and abnormalities in contextual processing. We propose that this is a consequence of abnormal gain control, a phenomenon that has been implicated in orientation-selectivity as well as surround suppression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0060951

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some authors have argued that the impairment of gain control is a robust and significant property of visual processing in schizophrenia, and may even consider it a core feature of the disorder.

    “Some authors have argued, in line with the findings that stem from the study of VIs, that the impairment of gain control is a robust and significant property of visual processing in schizophrenia, and may even consider it a core feature of the disorder (Robol et al., 2013; Tibber et al., 2013).”

    From What visual illusions teach us about schizophrenia (2014) · cites this paper as Robol et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 96 · Cited by 37

Authors
Robol, V., Tibber, M. S., Anderson, E. J., Bobin, T., Carlin, P., Shergill, S. S., & Dakin, S. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • University College London (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Robol, Valentina
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-04-09
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
e60951
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079095503
Cited by
37
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
schizophrenia, visual crowding, contour detection, gain control, contextual processing, orientation selectivity, visual perception deficits
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Form Perception, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Schizophrenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review