The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ginger Extract Inhibits Biofilm Formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14
Open accessAbstract
Bacterial biofilm formation can cause serious problems in clinical and industrial settings, which drives the development or screening of biofilm inhibitors. Some biofilm inhibitors have been screened from natural products or modified from natural compounds. Ginger has been used as a medicinal herb to treat infectious diseases for thousands of years, which leads to the hypothesis that it may contain chemicals inhibiting biofilm formation. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated ginger's ability to inhibit Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 biofilm formation. A static biofilm assay demonstrated that biofilm development was reduced by 39-56% when ginger extract was added to the culture. In addition, various phenotypes were altered after ginger addition of PA14. Ginger extract decreased production of extracellular polymeric substances. This finding was confirmed by chemical analysis and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Furthermore, ginger extract formed noticeably less rugose colonies on agar plates containing Congo red and facilitated swarming motility on soft agar plates. The inhibition of biofilm formation and the altered phenotypes appear to be linked to a reduced level of a second messenger, bis-(3'-5')-cyclic dimeric guanosine monophosphate. Importantly, ginger extract inhibited biofilm formation in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Also, surface biofilm cells formed with ginger extract detached more easily with surfactant than did those without ginger extract. Taken together, these findings provide a foundation for the possible discovery of a broad spectrum biofilm inhibitor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Involvement of Cell-to-Cell Signals in the Development of a Bacterial Biofilm
Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W., & Greenberg, E. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5361.295 · Cited by 3,396
Kaplan, J. B., Ragunath, C., Ramasubbu, N., & Fine, D. H. (2003) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.185.16.4693-4698.2003 · Cited by 364
Cited by
Bioactive Compounds and Bioactivities of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe)
Mao, Q.-Q., Xu, X.-Y., Cao, S.-Y., Gan, R.-Y., Corke, H., Beta, T., & Li, H.-B. (2019) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods8060185 · Cited by 1,418
Biofilm, pathogenesis and prevention—a journey to break the wall: a review
Gupta, P., Sarkar, S., Das, B., Bhattacharjee, S., & Tribedi, P. (2016) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00203-015-1148-6 · Cited by 493
Kim, H.-S., Lee, S.-H., Byun, Y., & Park, H.-D. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep08656 · Cited by 317
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, H.-S., & Park, H.-D.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-09-27
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e76106
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057153376
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ginger Extract Inhibits Biofilm Formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0076106
- The paper
- Kim, H.-S., & Park, H.-D. (2013). Ginger Extract Inhibits Biofilm Formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.