Cited by 196Marine animal studies overviewWildlife Ecology and ConservationMarine and fisheries research

Recovery Trends in Marine Mammal Populations

Open access
Magera, Anna M., Mills Flemming, Joanna E., Kaschner, Kristin, Christensen, Line B., Lotze, Heike K.·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Marine mammals have greatly benefitted from a shift from resource exploitation towards conservation. Often lauded as symbols of conservation success, some marine mammal populations have shown remarkable recoveries after severe depletions. Others have remained at low abundance levels, continued to decline, or become extinct or extirpated. Here we provide a quantitative assessment of (1) publicly available population-level abundance data for marine mammals worldwide, (2) abundance trends and recovery status, and (3) historic population decline and recent recovery. We compiled 182 population abundance time series for 47 species and identified major data gaps. In order to compare across the largest possible set of time series with varying data quality, quantity and frequency, we considered an increase in population abundance as evidence of recovery. Using robust log-linear regression over three generations, we were able to classify abundance trends for 92 spatially non-overlapping populations as Significantly Increasing (42%), Significantly Decreasing (10%), Non-Significant Change (28%) and Unknown (20%). Our results were comparable to IUCN classifications for equivalent species. Among different groupings, pinnipeds and other marine mammals (sirenians, polar bears and otters) showed the highest proportion of recovering populations, likely benefiting from relatively fast life histories and nearshore habitats that provided visibility and protective management measures. Recovery was less frequent among cetaceans, but more common in coastal than offshore populations. For marine mammals with available historical abundance estimates (n = 47), larger historical population declines were associated with low or variable recent recoveries so far. Overall, our results show that many formerly depleted marine mammal populations are recovering. However, data-deficient populations and those with decreasing and non-significant trends require attention. In particular, increased study of populations with major data gaps, including offshore small cetaceans, cryptic species, and marine mammals in low latitudes and developing nations, is needed to better understand the status of marine mammal populations worldwide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0077908

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Marine mammals have shown marked declines in abundance in recent centuries, many to near extinction.

    “while marine mammalshaveshownmarkeddeclinesinabundance in recent centuries, many to near extinction ( 41 , 42 ).”

    From Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change (2019) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Introduction says humans often depleted marine mammal populations and that numerous species reached very low abundance by or during the 1900s. It says *some*, rather than many, came almost to extinction, so the claim overstates that part. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 196

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [21]Kasuya T (2007) Japanese whaling and other cetacean fisheries. Environmental Science & Pollution Research 14: 39– 48. 17352127
  2. [36]Oxford Dictionaries (2010) Recovery. Oxford Dictionaries: Oxford University Press.
  3. [56]Swartz SL, Taylor BL, Rugh DJ (2006) Gray whale Eschrichtius robustus population and stock identity. Mammal Review 1: 66– 84.
  4. [60]Lefebvre LW, Reynolds III JE, Ragen TJ, Langtimm CA, Valade JA (2009) Manatee population ecology and management workshop proceedings. In: Lefebvre LW, Reynolds III JE, Ragen TJ, Langtimm CA, Valade JA, editors; April 2002; Gainsville, Florida. U.S. Geological Survey.
  5. [92]Whitehead H, Mann J (2000) Female reproductive strategies of cetaceans: Life histories and calf care. In: Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PL, Whitehead H, editors. Cetacean Societies. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. 219–246.

Authors
Magera, A. M., Mills Flemming, J. E., Kaschner, K., Christensen, L. B., & Lotze, H. K.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Magera, Anna M.
  • Kaschner, Kristin
  • Christensen, Line B.
  • Lotze, Heike K.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-10-30
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
e77908
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099539726
Cited by
196
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Dalhousie University
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
marine mammal populations, population recovery, abundance trends, population decline (ecology), conservation success, pinnipeds, cetaceans, sirenians, polar bear, otter, historical population estimates, data gaps, IUCN Red List, cryptic species
MeSH terms
Animals, Conservation of Energy Resources, Mammals, Marine Biology, Population Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review