Tissue Distribution of Berberine and Its Metabolites after Oral Administration in Rats
Open accessAbstract
Berberine (BBR) has been confirmed to have multiple bioactivities in clinic, such as cholesterol-lowering, anti-diabetes, cardiovascular protection and anti- inflammation. However, BBR's plasma level is very low; it cannot explain its pharmacological effects in patients. We consider that the in vivo distribution of BBR as well as of its bioactive metabolites might provide part of the explanation for this question. In this study, liquid chromatography coupled to ion trap time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC/MS(n)-IT-TOF) as well as liquid chromatography that coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used for the study of tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics of BBR in rats after oral administration (200 mg/kg). The results indicated that BBR was quickly distributed in the liver, kidneys, muscle, lungs, brain, heart, pancreas and fat in a descending order of its amount. The pharmacokinetic profile indicated that BBR's level in most of studied tissues was higher (or much higher) than that in plasma 4 h after administration. BBR remained relatively stable in the tissues like liver, heart, brain, muscle, pancreas etc. Organ distribution of BBR's metabolites was also investigated paralleled with that of BBR. Thalifendine (M1), berberrubine (M2) and jatrorrhizine (M4), which the metabolites with moderate bioactivity, were easily detected in organs like the liver and kidney. For instance, M1, M2 and M4 were the major metabolites in the liver, among which the percentage of M2 was up to 65.1%; the level of AUC (0-t) (area under the concentration-time curve) for BBR or the metabolites in the liver was 10-fold or 30-fold higher than that in plasma, respectively. In summary, the organ concentration of BBR (as well as its bioactive metabolites) was higher than its concentration in the blood after oral administration. It might explain BBR's pharmacological effects on human diseases in clinic.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tissue distribution of berberine favors the liver and intestine over plasma.
“and tissue distribution favors the liver and intestine over plasma [57].”
From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [57]
The Results and Discussion section reports that berberine was more abundant in the liver than in plasma after oral administration in rats. It does not report a corresponding intestine-to-plasma tissue comparison; its reference to intestinal first-pass elimination does not establish that part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 266
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [26]Li X, Chen X, Yang Y (1999) Pharmacokinetic study of baicalin in rabbits with inflammatory brain edema. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal 34: 107– 109.
- Authors
- Tan, X.-S., Ma, J.-Y., Feng, R., Ma, C., Chen, W.-J., Sun, Y.-P., Fu, J., Huang, M., He, C.-Y., Shou, J.-W., He, W.-Y., Wang, Y., & Jiang, J.-D.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Yan
- Jiang, Jian-Dong
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-10-31
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e77969
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3815028
- OpenAlex
- W1977322817
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 6.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81072611, 2012ZX09301002-001)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Berberine and alkaloids research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis
- Keywords
- berberine, tissue distribution, pharmacokinetics, berberrubine, jatrorrhizine, oral administration, plasma protein binding, liver, kidney, bioactive metabolites
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Animals, Berberine, Chromatography, Liquid, Humans, Male, Tissue Distribution, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Area Under Curve, Rats, Tandem Mass Spectrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review