Cited by 15Bone Metabolism and Diseasesdental development and anomaliesBone and Dental Protein Studies

Role of RANKL (TNFSF11)-Dependent Osteopetrosis in the Dental Phenotype of Msx2 Null Mutant Mice

Open access
Castaneda, Beatriz, Simon, Yohann, Ferbus, Didier, Robert, Benoit, Chesneau, Julie, Mueller, Christopher, Berdal, Ariane, Lézot, Frédéric·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The MSX2 homeoprotein is implicated in all aspects of craniofacial skeletal development. During postnatal growth, MSX2 is expressed in all cells involved in mineralized tissue formation and plays a role in their differentiation and function. Msx2 null (Msx2 (-/-)) mice display complex craniofacial skeleton abnormalities with bone and tooth defects. A moderate form osteopetrotic phenotype is observed, along with decreased expression of RANKL (TNFSF11), the main osteoclast-differentiating factor. In order to elucidate the role of such an osteopetrosis in the Msx2 (-/-) mouse dental phenotype, a bone resorption rescue was performed by mating Msx2 (-/-) mice with a transgenic mouse line overexpressing Rank (Tnfrsf11a). Msx2 (-/-) Rank(Tg) mice had significant improvement in the molar phenotype, while incisor epithelium defects were exacerbated in the enamel area, with formation of massive osteolytic tumors. Although compensation for RANKL loss of function could have potential as a therapy for osteopetrosis, but in Msx2 (-/-) mice, this approach via RANK overexpression in monocyte-derived lineages, amplified latent epithelial tumor development in the peculiar continuously growing incisor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0080054

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Msx2 deficient adult mice show a slight osteopetrosis phenotype in the skull, tibia, and mandible, which could be reversed by RANK overexpression.

    “It has also been reported that Msx2 deficient adult mice show a slight osteopetrosis phenotype in the skull, tibia, and mandible, which could be reversed by RANK overexpression24.”

    From Targeting Msx2 as a brake in the fusion fate of osteoclasts and an anabolic therapy in pre-clinical models of osteoporosis (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Results and Discussion report soft osteopetrosis in the tibia that shifted toward osteopenia with RANK overexpression; they also report partial closure of a skull defect. But the Figure 5 caption says the Msx2-deficient mandible had no major alterations compared with wild type, while RANK overexpression caused marked mandibular bone disruption. The paper therefore does not support reversal of a slight osteopetrosis phenotype across all three sites. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Msx2 null mutant mice show osteopetrosis in a RANK-dependent manner, suggesting Msx2 might participate in osteoclastogenesis.

    “Although Msx2 is generally considered an important regulator of osteogenesis, Msx2 null mutant mice show an osteopetrosis phenotype in a RANK-dependent manner in skeleton24, suggesting that Msx2 might also participate in osteoclastogenesis, and its regulatory effect in the bone environment could be complex.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 15

Authors
Castaneda, B., Simon, Y., Ferbus, D., Robert, B., Chesneau, J., Mueller, C., Berdal, A., & Lézot, F.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Lézot, Frédéric
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-11-21
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
e80054
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079555209
Cited by
15
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Institut National Du Cancer
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone and Dental Protein Studies
Keywords
Msx2, osteopetrosis, RANKL, dental phenotype, osteoclastogenesis, bone resorption, enamel defects, osteolytic tumor, monocyte-derived cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Osteopetrosis, Phenotype, Tooth, DNA Primers, Mice, Knockout, Homeodomain Proteins, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Mice, RANK Ligand, X-Ray Microtomography, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review