Cited by 74Climate change impacts on agricultureSoil and Land Suitability AnalysisRemote Sensing in Agriculture

Changes in the potential multiple cropping system in response to climate change in China from 1960–2010

Open access
Liu, Luo, Xu, Xinliang, Zhuang, Dafang, Chen, Xi, Li, Shuang·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The multiple cropping practice is essential to agriculture because it has been shown to significantly increase the grain yield and promote agricultural economic development. In this study, potential multiple cropping systems in China are calculated based on meteorological observation data by using the Agricultural Ecology Zone (AEZ) model. Following this, the changes in the potential cropping systems in response to climate change between the 1960s and the 2010s were subsequently analyzed. The results indicate that the changes of potential multiple cropping systems show tremendous heterogeneity in respect to the spatial pattern in China. A key finding is that the magnitude of change of the potential cropping systems showed a pattern of increase both from northern China to southern China and from western China to eastern China. Furthermore, the area found to be suitable only for single cropping decreased, while the area suitable for triple cropping increased significantly from the 1960s to the 2000s. During the studied period, the potential multiple cropping index (PMCI) gap between rain-fed and irrigated scenarios increased from 18% to 24%, which indicated noticeable growth of water supply limitations under the rain-fed scenario. The most significant finding of this research was that from the 1960s to the 2000s climate change had led to a significant increase of PMCI by 13% under irrigated scenario and 7% under rain-fed scenario across the whole of China. Furthermore, the growth of the annual mean temperature is identified as the main reason underlying the increase of PMCI. It has also been noticed that across China the changes of potential multiple cropping systems under climate change were different from region to region.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0080990

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is viable in many regions to intensify cropping by expanding current multiple cropping areas, growing biofuel crops during fallow season, or bringing back previous abandoned multiple cropping.

    “It is viable in many regions to intensify cropping by expanding current multiple cropping areas [56,106], growing biofuel crops during fallow season [107,108] or bringing back previous abandoned multiple cropping (which was converted to lower intensity because of high farming cost or other reasons) [56,109].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 74

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [6]Shulan J, Lichun H, Lei X (2011a) The Relationship of Multiple Cropping Index of Arableland Change and National Food Security in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 27: 208– 212.
  2. [8]Jing L, Zhiyuan R (2011) The Monitoring for cropping index of arable land in northwest region using SPOTNDVI-A case of Shaanxi Province. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment 25: 86– 91.
  3. [29]FAO (1984) Guidelines: Land Evaluation for Rain-fed Agriculture. FAO Soils Bulletin. 52.
  4. [30]FAO (1985) Guidelines: Land Evaluation for Irrigated Agriculture. FAO Soils Bulletin. 55.
  5. [37]Monteith JL (1981) Evapotranspiration and surface temperature. Quarterly Journal Royal Meteorological Society 107: 1– 27.

Authors
Liu, L., Xu, X., Zhuang, D., Chen, X., & Li, S.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Xinliang
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-12-03
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
e80990
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998831224
Cited by
74
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2010CB950901)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Keywords
multiple cropping, climate change impacts on agriculture, triple cropping, rainfed agriculture, irrigated agriculture, temperature rise, China
MeSH terms
Agriculture, China, Crops, Agricultural, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review