The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Importance of Large-Diameter Trees to Forest Structural Heterogeneity
Open accessAbstract
Large-diameter trees dominate the structure, dynamics and function of many temperate and tropical forests. However, their attendant contributions to forest heterogeneity are rarely addressed. We established the Wind River Forest Dynamics Plot, a 25.6 ha permanent plot within which we tagged and mapped all 30,973 woody stems ≥ 1 cm dbh, all 1,966 snags ≥ 10 cm dbh, and all shrub patches ≥ 2 m(2). Basal area of the 26 woody species was 62.18 m(2)/ha, of which 61.60 m(2)/ha was trees and 0.58 m(2)/ha was tall shrubs. Large-diameter trees (≥ 100 cm dbh) comprised 1.5% of stems, 31.8% of basal area, and 17.6% of the heterogeneity of basal area, with basal area dominated by Tsuga heterophylla and Pseudotsuga menziesii. Small-diameter subpopulations of Pseudotsuga menziesii, Tsuga heterophylla and Thuja plicata, as well as all tree species combined, exhibited significant aggregation relative to the null model of complete spatial randomness (CSR) up to 9 m (P ≤ 0.001). Patterns of large-diameter trees were either not different from CSR (Tsuga heterophylla), or exhibited slight aggregation (Pseudotsuga menziesii and Thuja plicata). Significant spatial repulsion between large-diameter and small-diameter Tsuga heterophylla suggests that large-diameter Tsuga heterophylla function as organizers of tree demography over decadal timescales through competitive interactions. Comparison among two forest dynamics plots suggests that forest structural diversity responds to intermediate-scale environmental heterogeneity and disturbances, similar to hypotheses about patterns of species richness, and richness- ecosystem function. Large mapped plots with detailed within-plot environmental spatial covariates will be required to test these hypotheses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rings, circles and null models for point pattern analysis in ecology.
Wiegand, T., & A. Moloney, K. (2004) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12497.x · Cited by 1,157
Cited by
The ecology, distribution, conservation and management of large old trees
Lindenmayer, D. B., & Laurance, W. F. (2017) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12290 · Cited by 531
Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale
LaManna, J. A., Mangan, S. A., Alonso, A., Bourg, N. A., Brockelman, W. Y., Bunyavejchewin, S., Chang, L.-W., Chiang, J.-M., Chuyong, G. B., Clay, K., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam5678 · Cited by 334
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lutz, J. A., Larson, A. J., Freund, J. A., Swanson, M. E., & Bible, K. J.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-12-20
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e82784
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030774481
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Importance of Large-Diameter Trees to Forest Structural Heterogeneity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0082784
- The paper
- Lutz, J. A., Larson, A. J., Freund, J. A., Swanson, M. E., & Bible, K. J. (2013). The Importance of Large-Diameter Trees to Forest Structural Heterogeneity. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082784
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.