The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Systematic Review of Risk Factors Associated with Surgical Site Infections among Surgical Patients
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Surgical site infection (SSI) complicates 2-5% of surgeries in the United States. Severity of SSI ranges from superficial skin infection to life-threatening conditions such as severe sepsis, and SSIs are responsible for increased morbidity, mortality, and economic burden associated with surgery. Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a commonly-isolated organism for SSI, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus SSI incidence is increasing globally. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to characterize risk factors for SSI within observational studies describing incidence of SSI in a real-world setting. EVIDENCE REVIEW: An initial search identified 328 titles published in 2002-2012; 57 were identified as relevant for data extraction. Extracted information included study design and methodology, reported cumulative incidence and post-surgical time until onset of SSI, and odds ratios and associated variability for all factors considered in univariate and/or multivariable analyses. FINDINGS: Median SSI incidence was 3.7%, ranging from 0.1% to 50.4%. Incidence of overall SSI and S. aureus SSI were both highest in tumor-related and transplant surgeries. Median time until SSI onset was 17.0 days, with longer time-to-onset for orthopedic and transplant surgeries. Risk factors consistently identified as associated with SSI included co-morbidities, advanced age, risk indices, patient frailty, and surgery complexity. Thirteen studies considered diabetes as a risk factor in multivariable analysis; 85% found a significant association with SSI, with odds ratios ranging from 1.5-24.3. Longer surgeries were associated with increased SSI risk, with a median odds ratio of 2.3 across 11 studies reporting significant results. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In a broad review of published literature, risk factors for SSI were characterized as describing reduced fitness, patient frailty, surgery duration, and complexity. Recognition of risk factors frequently associated with SSI allows for identification of such patients with the greatest need for optimal preventive measures to be identified and pre-treatment prior to surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prolonged operative duration is associated with complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Cheng, H., Clymer, J. W., Po-Han Chen, B., Sadeghirad, B., Ferko, N. C., Cameron, C. G., & Hinoul, P. (2018) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.022 · Cited by 913
Prolonged Operative Duration Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review
Cheng, H., Chen, B. P.-H., Soleas, I. M., Ferko, N. C., Cameron, C. G., & Hinoul, P. (2017) · Surgical Infections · doi:10.1089/sur.2017.089 · Cited by 853
Menz, B. D., Charani, E., Gordon, D. L., Leather, A. J., Moonesinghe, S. R., & Phillips, C. J. (2021) · Infection and Drug Resistance · doi:10.2147/idr.s319780 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Korol, E., Johnston, K., Waser, N., Sifakis, F., Jafri, H. S., Lo, M., & Kyaw, M. H.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-12-18
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e83743
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079597817
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors Associated with Surgical Site Infections among Surgical Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0083743
- The paper
- Korol, E., Johnston, K., Waser, N., Sifakis, F., Jafri, H. S., Lo, M., & Kyaw, M. H. (2013). A Systematic Review of Risk Factors Associated with Surgical Site Infections among Surgical Patients. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083743
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.