Cited by 67Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Incidence of and Mortality from Type I Diabetes in Taiwan From 1999 through 2010: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Open access
Lin, Wei-Hung, Wang, Ming-Cheng, Wang, Wei-Ming, Yang, Deng-Chi, Lam, Chen-Fuh, Roan, Jun-Neng, Li, Chung-Yi·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the secular trend in incidence of and mortality from Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in Taiwan, 1999-2010. METHODS: All 7,225 incident cases of T1DM were retrospectively retrieved from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database from 1999 to 2010. Trend of bi-annual age- and sex-specific incidence rates of T1DM was calculated and tested with Poisson regression model. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated, using age-, sex-, and calendar years-specific mortality rates of the general population as the reference, to estimate the relative mortality risk of T1DM. RESULTS: The number of male and female T1DM was 3,471 (48%) and 3,754 (52%), respectively. The annual number of incident T1DM increased from 543 in 1999 to 737 in 2010. The overall bi-annual incidence rate rose from 1999-00 to 2003-04 and mildly declined thereafter rose to 2009-10, with an insignificant trend (P = 0.489) over the study period. Regardless of gender, the higher age-specific incidence rate was noted in the younger groups (<30 years) and highest at <15 years. The incidence rates in younger groups were constantly higher in female population than in male one. The SMR from all causes was significantly increased at 3.00 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.83-3.16) in patients with T1DM. The sex-specific SMR was 2.66 (95% CI 2.46-2.85) and 3.58 (95% CI 3.28-3.87) for male and female patients, respectively. For both sexes, the age-specific SMR peaked at 15-29 years. CONCLUSIONS: Among T1DM patients in Taiwan, there were significant increasing trends in males and female aged <15 years. We also noted a significantly increased overall and sex-specific SMR from all causes in patients with TIDM which suggests a need for improvements in treatment and care of patients with T1DM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0086172

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Taiwan, women with type 1 diabetes mellitus aged ≥60 years were at slightly increased risk of mortality compared with women in the general population (SMR 1.28, 95% CI 1.06-1.50), and no increased risk was observed among men (SMR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77-1.10).

    “In Taiwan, women with T1DM aged ≥60 years were at slightly increased risk of mortality compared with women in the general population of the same age (SMR 1.28, 95% CI 1.06–1.50), and no increased risk was observed among men (SMR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77–1.10)20.”

    From The epidemiology of type 1 diabetes mellitus in older adults (2025) · cites this paper as [20]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Taiwan, type 1 diabetes mellitus incidence in women aged ≥60 years was 0.67 per 100,000 in 2009-2010, more than double the incidence of 0.29 per 100,000 in men.

    “One, using National Health Insurance data, found that the incidence in women aged ≥60 years was 0.67 per 100,000 individuals in 2009–2010; this was more than double the incidence of 0.29 per 100,000 in men for the same period20.”

    From The epidemiology of type 1 diabetes mellitus in older adults (2025) · cites this paper as [20]

    Table 1 in the Results lists 0.67 per 100,000 for women aged 60 or older in 2009–10, as claimed. It lists 0.39, not 0.29, for men in that age group and period; 0.67 is therefore not more than double the male rate. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. [2]Nishimura R, LaPorte RE, Dorman JS, Tajima N, Becker D, et al (2001) Mortality trends in type 1 diabetes. The Allegheny County (Pennsylvania) Registry 1965–1999. Diabetes Care 24: 823– 7. 11347737
  2. [3]Shankar A, Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE (2007) Association between glycosylated hemoglobin level and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in type 1 diabetes. Am J Epidemiol 166(4): 393– 402. 17526864
  3. [4]Goldstein DE, Walker B, Rawlings SS, Hess RL, England JD, et al (1980) Hemoglobin A1c levels in children and adolescents with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 3: 503– 7. 7006943
  4. [5]Ziegler R, Heidtmann B, Hilgard D, Hofer S, Rosenbauer J, et al (2011) Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 12: 11– 7. 20337978
  5. [6]Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, Rohde RD (1993) The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. The Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med 329: 1456– 62. 8413456
  6. [7]Secrest AM, Becker DJ, Kelsey SF, LaPorte RE, Orchard TJ (2010) All-cause mortality trends in a large population-based cohort with long-standing childhood-onset type 1 diabetes: the Allegheny County type 1 diabetes registry. Diabetes Care 33: 2573– 9. 21115767 PMC2992193
  7. [8]Skrivarhaug T, Bangstad HJ, Stene LC, Sandvik L, Hanssen KF, et al (2006) Long-term mortality in a nationwide cohort of childhood-onset type 1 diabetic patients in Norway. Diabetologia 49: 298– 305. 16365724
  8. [9]Onkamo P, Vaananen S, Karvonen M, Tuomilehto J (1999) Worldwide increase in incidence of Type I diabetes – the analysis of the data on published incidence trends. Diabetologia 42: 1395– 403. 10651256
  9. [10]The DIAMOND Project Group (2006) Incidence and trends of childhood Type 1 diabetes worldwide 1990–1999. Diabetic Medicine 23: 857– 66. 16911623
  10. [11]Wei JN, Sung FC, Lin CC, Lin RS, Chiang CC, et al (2003) National surveillance for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Taiwanese children. JAMA 290: 1345– 50. 12966126
  11. [12]Wei JN, Li HY, Chang CH, Sung FC, Li CY, et al (2006) Birth weight and type 1 diabetes among schoolchildren in Taiwan – A population-based case-controlled study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 74: 309– 15. 16814899
  12. [13]Jiang YD, Chang CH, Tai TY, Chen JF, Chuang LM (2012) Incidence and prevalence rates of diabetes mellitus in Taiwan: analysis of the 2000–2009 Nationwide Health Insurance database. J Formos Med Assoc 111: 599– 604. 23217595
  13. [14]Chiu YM, Lai CH (2010) Nationwide population-based epidemiologic study of systemic lupus erythematosus in Taiwan. Lupus 19: 1250– 5. 20647248
  14. [15]Chen HF, Chen P, Li CY (2011) Risk of malignant neoplasm of the pancreas in relation to diabetes: a population-based study in Taiwan. Diabetes Care 34: 1177– 9. 21398527 PMC3114480
  15. [16]American Diabetes Association (2004) Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 27 Suppl 1 S5– S10. 14693921
  16. [17]Lawrence JM, Black MH, Zhang JL, Slezak JM, Takhar HS, et al. (2014) Validation of Pediatric Diabetes Case Identification Approaches for Diagnosed Cases by Using Information in the Electronic Health Records of a Large Integrated Managed Health Care Organization. Am J Epidemiol 179:: 27–38. 24100956
  17. [18]Karvonen M, Tuomilehto J, Libman I, LaPorte R (1993) A review of the recent epidemiological data on the worldwide incidence of type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. World Health Organization DIAMOND Project Group. Diabetologia 36: 883– 92. 8243865
  18. [19]Fu H, Shen SX, Chen ZW, Wang JJ, Ye TT, et al (1994) Shanghai, China, has the lowest confirmed incidence of childhood diabetes in the world. Diabetes Care 17: 1206– 8. 7821146
  19. [20]Shen SX, Wang HB, Chen ZW, Shen YE, Fu H, et al (1996) The incidence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in urban districts of Shanghai (1989–1993). J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 9: 469– 73. 8910816
  20. [21]Chen F, Florkowski CM, Dever M, Beaven DW (2004) Death Certification and New Zealand Health Information Service (NZHIS) statistics for diabetes mellitus: an under-recognised health problem. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 63: 113– 8. 14739051
  21. [22]DERI Mortality Study Group (1991) Sex differences in the mortality associated with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in four countries. The Diabetes Epidemiology Research International (DERI) Study. Am J Epidemiol 133: 577– 84. 2006644
  22. [23]Dawson SI, Willis J, Florkowski CM, Scott RS (2008) All-cause mortality in insulin-treated diabetic patients: a 20-year follow-up. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 80: e6– 9. 18329123
  23. [24]Laing SP, Swerdlow AJ, Slater SD, Botha JL, Burden AC, et al (1999) The British Diabetic Association Cohort Study, I: all-cause mortality in patients with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus. Diabetic Medicine 16: 459– 65. 10391392
  24. [25]Burnet DL, Cooper AJ, Drum ML, Lipton RB (2007) Risk factors for mortality in a diverse cohort of patients with childhood-onset diabetes in Chicago. Diabetes Care 30: 2559– 63. 17644621
  25. [26]Deckert T, Poulsen JE, Larsen M (1978) Prognosis of diabetics with diabetes onset before the age of thirty-one. I. Survival, causes of death, and complications. Diabetologia 14: 363– 70. 669100
  26. [27]Riley MD, McCarty DJ, Couper DJ, Humphrey AR, Dwyer T, et al (1995) The 1984 Tasmanian insulin treated diabetes mellitus prevalence cohort: an eight and a half year mortality follow-up investigation. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 29: 27– 35. 8593756
  27. [28]Borch-Johnsen K, Kreiner S, Deckert T (1986) Mortality of type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in Denmark: a study of relative mortality in 2930 Danish type 1 diabetic patients diagnosed from 1933 to 1972. Diabetologia 29: 767– 72. 3493184
  28. [29]Harjutsalo V, Sjoberg L, Tuomilehto J (2008) Time trends in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in Finnish children: a cohort study. Lancet 371: 1777– 82. 18502302
  29. [30]Liu CC, Chen KR, Chen HF, Huang HL, Ko MC, et al (2010) Trends in hospitalization for diabetic ketoacidosis in diabetic patients in Taiwan: analysis of national claims data, 1997–2005. J Formos Med Assoc 109: 725– 34. 20970069
  30. [31]Meltzer LJ, Johnson SB, Prine JM, Banks RA, Desrosiers PM, et al (2001) Disordered eating, body mass, and glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 24: 678– 82. 11315830
  31. [32]Rodin GM, Daneman D (1992) Eating disorders and IDDM. A problematic association. Diabetes Care 15: 1402– 12. 1425109
  32. [33]Orchard TJ, Secrest AM, Miller RG, Costacou T (2010) In the absence of renal disease, 20 year mortality risk in type 1 diabetes is comparable to that of the general population: a report from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study. Diabetologia 53: 2312– 9. 20665208 PMC3057031
  33. [36]Laing SP, Jones ME, Swerdlow AJ, Burden AC, Gatling W (2005) Psychosocial and socioeconomic risk factors for premature death in young people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 28: 1618– 23. 15983310
  34. [37]Laing SP, Swerdlow AJ, Slater SD, Botha JL, Burden AC, et al (1999) The British Diabetic Association Cohort Study, II: cause-specific mortality in patients with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus. Diabetic Medicine 16: 466– 71. 10391393
  35. [38]Usher-Smith JA, Thompson M, Ercole A, Walter FM (2012) Variation between countries in the frequency of diabetic ketoacidosis at first presentation of type 1 diabetes in children: a systematic review. Diabetologia 55: 2878– 94. 22933123 PMC3464389
  36. [39]Ting WH, Huang CY, Lo FS, Hung CM, Chan CJ, et al (2007) Clinical and laboratory characteristics of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents: experience from a medical center. Acta paediatrica Taiwanica 48: 119– 24. 17912982

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, W.-H., Wang, M.-C., Wang, W.-M., Yang, D.-C., Lam, C.-F., Roan, J.-N., & Li, C.-Y.
Affiliations
  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital (TW)
  • National Cheng Kung University (TW)
  • China Medical University (TW)
Corresponding author
Li, Chung-Yi
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-01-22
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
e86172
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999264251
Cited by
67
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Council
  • National Health Research Institutes
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, incidence trends, mortality, standardized mortality ratio, sex differences, age-specific incidence, young adults, Taiwan
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Population Surveillance, Sex Factors, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Age of Onset, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review