The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intra-Urban Human Mobility and Activity Transition: Evidence from Social Media Check-In Data
Open accessAbstract
Most existing human mobility literature focuses on exterior characteristics of movements but neglects activities, the driving force that underlies human movements. In this research, we combine activity-based analysis with a movement-based approach to model the intra-urban human mobility observed from about 15 million check-in records during a yearlong period in Shanghai, China. The proposed model is activity-based and includes two parts: the transition of travel demands during a specific time period and the movement between locations. For the first part, we find the transition probability between activities varies over time, and then we construct a temporal transition probability matrix to represent the transition probability of travel demands during a time interval. For the second part, we suggest that the travel demands can be divided into two classes, locationally mandatory activity (LMA) and locationally stochastic activity (LSA), according to whether the demand is associated with fixed location or not. By judging the combination of predecessor activity type and successor activity type we determine three trip patterns, each associated with a different decay parameter. To validate the model, we adopt the mechanism of an agent-based model and compare the simulated results with the observed pattern from the displacement distance distribution, the spatio-temporal distribution of activities, and the temporal distribution of travel demand transitions. The results show that the simulated patterns fit the observed data well, indicating that these findings open new directions for combining activity-based analysis with a movement-based approach using social media check-in data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Limits of Predictability in Human Mobility
Song, C., Qu, Z., Blumm, N., & Barabási, A.-L. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177170 · Cited by 3,234
Cited by
Tu, W., Cao, J., Yue, Y., Shaw, S.-L., Zhou, M., Wang, Z., Chang, X., Xu, Y., & Li, Q. (2017) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/13658816.2017.1356464 · Cited by 298
Uncovering urban human mobility from large scale taxi GPS data
Tang, J., Liu, F., Wang, Y., & Wang, H. (2015) · Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2015.06.032 · Cited by 280
Shen, Y., Sun, F., & Che, Y. (2017) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.06.018 · Cited by 258
Uncovering the spatial structure of mobility networks
Louail, T., Lenormand, M., Picornell, M., García Cantú, O., Herranz, R., Frias-Martinez, E., Ramasco, J. J., & Barthelemy, M. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7007 · Cited by 203
Spatiotemporal variation in travel regularity through transit user profiling
Manley, E., Zhong, C., & Batty, M. (2018) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-016-9747-x · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, L., Zhi, Y., Sui, Z., & Liu, Y.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-05-13
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e97010
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095571984
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intra-Urban Human Mobility and Activity Transition: Evidence from Social Media Check-In Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0097010
- The paper
- Wu, L., Zhi, Y., Sui, Z., & Liu, Y. (2014). Intra-Urban Human Mobility and Activity Transition: Evidence from Social Media Check-In Data. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.