Cited by 116Dermatologic Treatments and ResearchWound Healing and TreatmentsSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases

Anti-Fibrotic Actions of Interleukin-10 against Hypertrophic Scarring by Activation of PI3K/AKT and STAT3 Signaling Pathways in Scar-Forming Fibroblasts

Open access
Shi, Jihong, Li, Jun, Guan, Hao, Cai, Weixia, Bai, Xiaozhi, Fang, Xiaobing, Hu, Xiaolong, Wang, Yaojun +5 more·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The hypertrophic scar (HS) is a serious fibrotic skin condition and a major clinical problem. Interleukin-10 (IL-10) has been identified as a prospective scar-improving compound based on preclinical trials. Our previous work showed that IL-10 has anti-fibrotic effects in transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1-stimulated fibroblasts, as well as potential therapeutic benefits for the prevention and reduction of scar formation. However, relatively little is known about the mechanisms underlying IL-10-mediated anti-fibrotic and scar-improvement actions. OBJECTIVE: To explore the expression of the IL-10 receptor in human HS tissue and primary HS fibroblasts (HSFs), and the molecular mechanisms contributing to the anti-fibrotic and scar-improvement capabilities of IL-10. METHODS: Expression of the IL-10 receptor was assessed in HS tissue and HSFs by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence microscopy, and polymerase chain reaction analysis. Primary HSFs were treated with IL-10, a specific phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) inhibitor (LY294002) or a function-blocking antibody against the IL-10 receptor (IL-10RB). Next, Western blot analysis was used to evaluate changes in the phosphorylation status of AKT and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) 3, as well as the expression levels of fibrosis-related proteins. RESULTS: HS tissue and primary HSFs were characterized by expression of the IL-10 receptor and by high expression of fibrotic markers relative to normal controls. Primary HSFs expressed the IL-10 receptor, while IL-10 induced AKT and STAT3 phosphorylation in these cells. In addition, LY294002 blocked AKT and STAT phosphorylation, and also up-regulated expression levels of type I and type III collagen (Col 1 and Col 3) and alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) in IL-10-treated cells. Similarly, IL-10RB reduced STAT3/AKT phosphorylation and blocked the IL-10-mediated mitigation of fibrosis in HSFs. CONCLUSION: IL-10 apparently inhibits fibrosis by activating AKT and STAT3 phosphorylation downstream of the IL-10 receptor, and by facilitating crosstalk between the PI3K/AKT and STAT3 signal transduction pathways.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0098228

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vitro studies have shown that blocking signaling of IL-10 in fibroblasts may decrease keloid scar formation.

    “A role for these therapies in cutaneous fibrosis remains to be explored, though in vitro studies have shown that blocking signaling of the related cytokine IL-10 in fibroblasts may decrease keloid scar formation [102].”

    From Immunology of Wound Healing (2018) · cites this paper as [102]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 116

Authors
Shi, J., Li, J., Guan, H., Cai, W., Bai, X., Fang, X., Hu, X., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Zheng, Z., Su, L., Hu, D., & Zhu, X.
Affiliations
Xijing Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Hu, Dahai
  • Zhu, Xiongxiang
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-05-30
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
e98228
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000343974
Cited by
116
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81171811, XJZT12D01, 81272098)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Keywords
hypertrophic scars, IL-10, antifibrotic effect, scar formation, PI3K/Akt signaling, STAT3 signaling, IL-10 receptor, collagen expression, alpha-smooth muscle actin, TGF-β1, LY294002, skin fibrosis
MeSH terms
Enzyme Activation, Fibroblasts, Fibrosis, Humans, Skin, Signal Transduction, Interleukin-10, Cicatrix, Hypertrophic, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, Receptors, Interleukin-10, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review