Cited by 39CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringBacteriophages and microbial interactionsBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Phage Resistance Is Not Impeded by the DNA Modifications of Phage T4

Open access
Yaung, Stephanie J., Esvelt, Kevin M., Church, George M.·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Bacteria rely on two known DNA-level defenses against their bacteriophage predators: restriction-modification and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems. Certain phages have evolved countermeasures that are known to block endonucleases. For example, phage T4 not only adds hydroxymethyl groups to all of its cytosines, but also glucosylates them, a strategy that defeats almost all restriction enzymes. We sought to determine whether these DNA modifications can similarly impede CRISPR-based defenses. In a bioinformatics search, we found naturally occurring CRISPR spacers that potentially target phages known to modify their DNA. Experimentally, we show that the Cas9 nuclease from the Type II CRISPR system of Streptococcus pyogenes can overcome a variety of DNA modifications in Escherichia coli. The levels of Cas9-mediated phage resistance to bacteriophage T4 and the mutant phage T4 gt, which contains hydroxymethylated but not glucosylated cytosines, were comparable to phages with unmodified cytosines, T7 and the T4-like phage RB49. Our results demonstrate that Cas9 is not impeded by N6-methyladenine, 5-methylcytosine, 5-hydroxymethylated cytosine, or glucosylated 5-hydroxymethylated cytosine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0098811

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • First generation Cas9 proteins can be modified to carry 5-methylcytosine, analogous to the molecular defense strategy of phage T4.

    “To avoid this, first generation Cas9 proteins can be modified to carry 5-methylcytosine, analogous to the well-known molecular defense strategy of phage T4 in adding hydroxymethyl groups to its cytosines [99].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 39

Authors
Yaung, S. J., Esvelt, K. M., & Church, G. M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Church, George M.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-06-02
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
e98811
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124638114
Cited by
39
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DE-FG02-02ER63445)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐FG02‐, DEFG0202ER63445, FG02-02ER63445)
  • Hansjörg Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K99DK102669, R00DK102669)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, phage resistance, bacteriophage T4, DNA methylation, Cas9 nuclease, Streptococcus pyogenes, Escherichia coli, restriction-modification systems, CRISPR spacers, N6-methyladenine, 5-methylcytosine
MeSH terms
Cytosine, DNA, Bacterial, Endonucleases, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pyogenes, Bacteriophage T4, 5-Methylcytosine, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, CRISPR-Cas Systems, CRISPR-Associated Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review