Cited by 164Biosensors and Analytical DetectionTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologySARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Rapid Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Recombinase Polymerase Amplification

Open access
Boyle, David S., McNerney, Ruth, Teng Low, Hwee, Leader, Brandon Troy, Pérez-Osorio, Ailyn C., Meyer, Jessica C., O'Sullivan, Denise M., Brooks, David G. +2 more·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Improved access to effective tests for diagnosing tuberculosis (TB) has been designated a public health priority by the World Health Organisation. In high burden TB countries nucleic acid based TB tests have been restricted to centralised laboratories and specialised research settings. Requirements such as a constant electrical supply, air conditioning and skilled, computer literate operators prevent implementation of such tests in many settings. Isothermal DNA amplification technologies permit the use of simpler, less energy intensive detection platforms more suited to low resource settings that allow the accurate diagnosis of a disease within a short timeframe. Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) is a rapid, low temperature isothermal DNA amplification reaction. We report here RPA-based detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) DNA in <20 minutes at 39 °C. Assays for two MTC specific targets were investigated, IS6110 and IS1081. When testing purified MTC genomic DNA, limits of detection of 6.25 fg (IS6110) and 20 fg (IS1081)were consistently achieved. When testing a convenience sample of pulmonary specimens from suspected TB patients, RPA demonstrated superior accuracy to indirect fluorescence microscopy. Compared to culture, sensitivities for the IS1081 RPA and microscopy were 91.4% (95%CI: 85, 97.9) and 86.1% (95%CI: 78.1, 94.1) respectively (n = 71). Specificities were 100% and 88.6% (95% CI: 80.8, 96.1) respectively. For the IS6110 RPA and microscopy sensitivities of 87.5% (95%CI: 81.7, 93.2) and 70.8% (95%CI: 62.9, 78.7) were obtained (n = 90). Specificities were 95.4 (95% CI: 92.3,98.1) and 88% (95% CI: 83.6, 92.4) respectively. The superior specificity of RPA for detecting tuberculosis was due to the reduced ability of fluorescence microscopy to distinguish Mtb complex from other acid fast bacteria. The rapid nature of the RPA assay and its low energy requirement compared to other amplification technologies suggest RPA-based TB assays could be of use for integration into a point-of-care test for use in resource constrained settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0103091

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 164

Authors
Boyle, D. S., McNerney, R., Teng Low, H., Leader, B. T., Pérez-Osorio, A. C., Meyer, J. C., O'Sullivan, D. M., Brooks, D. G., Piepenburg, O., & Forrest, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (US)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Washington State Department of Health (US)
  • TwistDx (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Forrest, Matthew S.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-08-13
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
e103091
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083223269
Cited by
164
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI097038)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Keywords
tuberculosis diagnosis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, recombinase polymerase amplification, IS6110, IS1081, isothermal DNA amplification, rapid molecular diagnostics, resource-limited settings, acid-fast bacilli, sensitivity and specificity, point-of-care testing
MeSH terms
DNA, Bacterial, Humans, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tuberculosis, Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review