Phenotype Refinement Strengthens the Association of AHR and CYP1A1 Genotype with Caffeine Consumption
Open accessAbstract
Two genetic loci, one in the cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) and 1A2 (CYP1A2) gene region (rs2472297) and one near the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) gene (rs6968865), have been associated with habitual caffeine consumption. We sought to establish whether a more refined and comprehensive assessment of caffeine consumption would provide stronger evidence of association, and whether a combined allelic score comprising these two variants would further strengthen the association. We used data from between 4,460 and 7,520 women in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, a longitudinal birth cohort based in the United Kingdom. Self-report data on coffee, tea and cola consumption (including consumption of decaffeinated drinks) were available at multiple time points. Both genotypes were individually associated with total caffeine consumption, and with coffee and tea consumption. There was no association with cola consumption, possibly due to low levels of consumption in this sample. There was also no association with measures of decaffeinated drink consumption, indicating that the observed association is most likely mediated via caffeine. The association was strengthened when a combined allelic score was used, accounting for up to 1.28% of phenotypic variance. This was not associated with potential confounders of observational association. A combined allelic score accounts for sufficient phenotypic variance in caffeine consumption that this may be useful in Mendelian randomization studies. Future studies may therefore be able to use this combined allelic score to explore causal effects of habitual caffeine consumption on health outcomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the McMahon et al. (2014) study, the proportion of phenotypic variance explained by the two genotypes was small: CYP1A1 accounted for 0.15-0.88%, AHR for 0.04-0.048%, and the two combined for about 0.16-1.28%.
“the proportion of phenotypic variance (i.e.observed variability in caffeine intake) explained by these two genotypes was small: CYP1A1 accounted for 0.15-0.88%, AHR accounted for 0.04-0.048% and the two combined accounted for about 0.16-1.28%.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as McMahon et al., 2014
In the McMahon et al. (2014) study, both genotypes were individually associated with total caffeine consumption and with the consumption of caffeinated drinks at all time points, but not with the consumption of decaffeinated drinks.
“Both genotypes were individually associated with total caffeine consumption and with the consumption of caffeinated drinks (coffee and tea) at all time points, but not with the consumption of decaffeinated drinks.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as McMahon et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- McMahon, G., Taylor, A. E., Davey Smith, G., & Munafò, M. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- ORCID
- Taylor, Amy E.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-07-30
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e103448
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4116211
- OpenAlex
- W2048610563
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (MC_UU_12013/1, 102215, 092731)
- United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
- Cancer Research UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (MC_UU_12013/1)
- British Heart Foundation (092731)
- University of Bristol (MC_UU_12013/1, MC_UU_12013/1,9, 092731, MC_UU_12013)
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001425)
- Medical Research Council (G0802736, G0800612, MC_UU_12013, MR/J01351X/1, MC_UU_12013/1‐9, MCUU12013/1, MC_PC_15018, 092731, MR/K023233/1)
- Economic and Social Research Council
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Keywords
- caffeine consumption, aryl hydrocarbon receptor, CYP1A1, CYP1A2, coffee consumption, tea consumption, cola consumption, genetic association, Mendelian randomization, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Caffeine, Drinking Behavior, Female, Genotype, Humans, Life Style, Longitudinal Studies, Phenotype, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Genetic Variation, Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon, Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A1, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review