Cited by 22Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesNuclear Receptors and Signaling

Occupational complexity and risk of Parkinson's disease

Open access
Valdés, Elise G., Andel, Ross, Sieurin, Johanna, Feldman, Adina L., Edwards, Jerri D., Långström, Niklas, Gatz, Margaret, Wirdefeldt, Karin·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The etiology of Parkinson's disease (PD) remains unclear, and environmental risk-factors such as occupation have attracted interest. OBJECTIVE: The goal was to investigate occupational complexity in relation to PD. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study based on the Swedish Twin Registry that included 28,778 twins born between 1886 and 1950. We identified 433 PD cases during the study period. Data on occupation were collected from either the 1970 or 1980 Swedish census, and occupational complexity was assessed via a job exposure matrix. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses with age as the underlying time scale were used to assess PD risk as a function of the three domains of occupational complexity: data, people, and things. Sex and smoking were included as covariates. Analyses stratified by twin pair were conducted to test for confounding by familial factors. RESULTS: High occupational complexity with data and people was associated with increased risk overall (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.14, and HR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.21, respectively), and in men (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16, and HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.28, respectively). Complexity with things was not associated with risk of PD. When the analyses were stratified by twin pair, the HRs for occupational complexity with data and people were attenuated in men. CONCLUSIONS: High complexity of work with data and people is related to increased risk of PD, particularly in men. The attenuation of risk observed in the twin pair-stratified analyses suggests that the association may partly be explained by familial factors, such as inherited traits contributing to occupational selection or other factors shared by twins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0106676

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 22

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Miller AR, Treiman DJ, Cain PS, Roos PA (1980) Work, jobs, and occupations: A critical review of occupational titles. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Authors
Valdés, E. G., Andel, R., Sieurin, J., Feldman, A. L., Edwards, J. D., Långström, N., Gatz, M., & Wirdefeldt, K.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Valdés, Elise G.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-09-08
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
e106676
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082158507
Cited by
22
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Svenska Läkaresällskapet
  • Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond
  • Parkinsonfonden
  • European Regional Development Fund (CZ.1.05/1.100, FNUSA-ICRC (No. CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0123), CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0123.)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, occupational complexity, occupational risk factors, job-exposure matrix, sex differences, familial confounding, twin registry, occupational selection
MeSH terms
Humans, Parkinson Disease, Registries, Risk Factors, Sweden, Cohort Studies, Occupational Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review