Occupational complexity and risk of Parkinson's disease
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The etiology of Parkinson's disease (PD) remains unclear, and environmental risk-factors such as occupation have attracted interest. OBJECTIVE: The goal was to investigate occupational complexity in relation to PD. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study based on the Swedish Twin Registry that included 28,778 twins born between 1886 and 1950. We identified 433 PD cases during the study period. Data on occupation were collected from either the 1970 or 1980 Swedish census, and occupational complexity was assessed via a job exposure matrix. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses with age as the underlying time scale were used to assess PD risk as a function of the three domains of occupational complexity: data, people, and things. Sex and smoking were included as covariates. Analyses stratified by twin pair were conducted to test for confounding by familial factors. RESULTS: High occupational complexity with data and people was associated with increased risk overall (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.14, and HR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.21, respectively), and in men (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16, and HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.28, respectively). Complexity with things was not associated with risk of PD. When the analyses were stratified by twin pair, the HRs for occupational complexity with data and people were attenuated in men. CONCLUSIONS: High complexity of work with data and people is related to increased risk of PD, particularly in men. The attenuation of risk observed in the twin pair-stratified analyses suggests that the association may partly be explained by familial factors, such as inherited traits contributing to occupational selection or other factors shared by twins.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The strong causal effect of cognitive performance on Parkinson's disease is supported by observational studies.
“The strong causal effect of cognitive performance on PD is supported by observational studies (45).”
From Identification of novel risk loci, causal insights, and heritable risk for Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (2019) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 22
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [14]Miller AR, Treiman DJ, Cain PS, Roos PA (1980) Work, jobs, and occupations: A critical review of occupational titles. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Authors
- Valdés, E. G., Andel, R., Sieurin, J., Feldman, A. L., Edwards, J. D., Långström, N., Gatz, M., & Wirdefeldt, K.
- Affiliations
- University of South Florida (US)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Valdés, Elise G.
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-09-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e106676
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4157797
- OpenAlex
- W2082158507
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Svenska Läkaresällskapet
- Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond
- Parkinsonfonden
- European Regional Development Fund (CZ.1.05/1.100, FNUSA-ICRC (No. CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0123), CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0123.)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, occupational complexity, occupational risk factors, job-exposure matrix, sex differences, familial confounding, twin registry, occupational selection
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Parkinson Disease, Registries, Risk Factors, Sweden, Cohort Studies, Occupational Exposure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review