The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Antibiotic Use among the Public in Kuwait
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The emergence and spread of bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a growing problem worldwide, which presents a significant threat to public health globally in the 21st century. A substantial evidence has shown that the general community plays a role in the increase and spread of antibiotic resistance. The present study was designed to determine knowledge, attitude and practice towards antibiotic use. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was performed using a pretested self-administered questionnaire on a sample of 770 randomly selected Kuwaiti individuals. Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used in data analysis. RESULTS: The response rate was 88.3%. Nearly three-quarters (72.8%) of respondents had been prescribed antibiotics within 12 months prior to the study period, and 36% of them had not finished the course of treatment. Over one-quarter (27.5%) were self-medicated with antibiotics to treat mainly common cold, sore throat and cough. Self-medication was more prevalent among those who were prescribed antibiotics and those who had attitudes towards using and accessing antibiotic inappropriately. Almost 47% of participants had low knowledge regarding action, use, safety and resistance of antibiotics. Forty one percent of respondents had attitudes towards using and accessing antibiotic inappropriately. Better knowledge was found to be a predictor for positive attitude. Respondents level of agreement that doctors often prescribe antibiotics to meet the patient's expectation, and that doctors often take time to consider carefully the need for an antibiotic were 52.7% and 35.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings will aid in the assessment of the adequacy of present public educational campaigns. Also, it will provide further insight in designing future multifaceted interventions to promote specific messages to rationalize antibiotic use, and compensate for knowledge and attitude gaps as an effort towards preventing development of antibiotic resistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Costelloe, C., Metcalfe, C., Lovering, A., Mant, D., & Hay, A. D. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c2096 · Cited by 1,981
Cited by
Sakeena, M. H. F., Bennett, A. A., & McLachlan, A. J. (2018) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.09.022 · Cited by 157
Nepal, A., Hendrie, D., Robinson, S., & Selvey, L. A. (2019) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7924-5 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Awad, A. I., & Aboud, E. A.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2015-02-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e0117910
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014798538
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Antibiotic Use among the Public in Kuwait. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0117910
- The paper
- Awad, A. I., & Aboud, E. A. (2015). Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Antibiotic Use among the Public in Kuwait. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117910
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.