Microbial iron mats at the mid-atlantic ridge and evidence that zetaproteobacteria may be restricted to iron-oxidizing marine systems.
Open accessAbstract
Chemolithoautotrophic iron-oxidizing bacteria play an essential role in the global iron cycle. Thus far, the majority of marine iron-oxidizing bacteria have been identified as Zetaproteobacteria, a novel class within the phylum Proteobacteria. Marine iron-oxidizing microbial communities have been found associated with volcanically active seamounts, crustal spreading centers, and coastal waters. However, little is known about the presence and diversity of iron-oxidizing communities at hydrothermal systems along the slow crustal spreading center of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. From October to November 2012, samples were collected from rust-colored mats at three well-known hydrothermal vent systems on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (Rainbow, Trans-Atlantic Geotraverse, and Snake Pit) using the ROV Jason II. The goal of these efforts was to determine if iron-oxidizing Zetaproteobacteria were present at sites proximal to black smoker vent fields. Small, diffuse flow venting areas with high iron(II) concentrations and rust-colored microbial mats were observed at all three sites proximal to black smoker chimneys. A novel, syringe-based precision sampler was used to collect discrete microbial iron mat samples at the three sites. The presence of Zetaproteobacteria was confirmed using a combination of 16S rRNA pyrosequencing and single-cell sorting, while light micros-copy revealed a variety of iron-oxyhydroxide structures, indicating that active iron-oxidizing communities exist along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Sequencing analysis suggests that these iron mats contain cosmopolitan representatives of Zetaproteobacteria, but also exhibit diversity that may be uncommon at other iron-rich marine sites studied to date. A meta-analysis of publically available data encompassing a variety of aquatic habitats indicates that Zetaproteobacteria are rare if an iron source is not readily available. This work adds to the growing understanding of Zetaproteobacteria ecology and suggests that this organism is likely locally restricted to iron-rich marine environments but may exhibit wide-scale geographic distribution, further underscoring the importance of Zetaproteobacteria in global iron cycling.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Zetaproteobacteria are often described as ecosystem engineers due to their capacity to shape the local environment by producing iron oxyhydroxide sheaths and stalks.
“They are often described as ecosystem engineers due to their capacity to shape the local environment by producing iron oxyhydroxide sheaths and stalks (Chan et al., 2011; Fleming et al., 2013; Scott et al., 2015).”
From Is It First the Egg or the Shrimp? – Diversity and Variation in Microbial Communities Colonizing Broods of the Vent Shrimp Rimicaris exoculata During Embryonic Development (2019) · cites this paper as Scott et al., 2015
The Introduction (page not provided) says iron-oxidizing bacteria generate iron-oxyhydroxide mats that can alter water flow and local chemistry, and identifies Zetaproteobacteria as predominant marine iron oxidizers. It also identifies a Zetaproteobacteria species that produces stalks. But the Results (page not provided) find no apparent relationship between structural content and Zetaproteobacteria OTUs, so the paper does not establish that Zetaproteobacteria generally produce both the sheaths and stalks described in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOccurrence of Epsilonbacteraeota, Gammaproteobacteria and Zetaproteobacteria symbiont-related lineages in vent fluids and microbial mats of vent sites where R. exoculata also lives supports the hypothesis of a horizontal transmission mode for these three groups.
“Occurrence of Epsilonbacteraeota, Gammaproteobacteria and Zetaproteobacteria symbiont-related lineages in vent fluids and microbial mats of vent sites where R. exoculata also lives (Petersen et al., 2010; Scott et al., 2015) supports the hypothesis of a horizontal transmission mode for these three groups.”
From Is It First the Egg or the Shrimp? – Diversity and Variation in Microbial Communities Colonizing Broods of the Vent Shrimp Rimicaris exoculata During Embryonic Development (2019) · cites this paper as Scott et al., 2015
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 106 · Cited by 88
- Authors
- Scott, J. J., Breier, J. A., Luther, G. W., & Emerson, D.
- Affiliations
- Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences (US)
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
- University of Delaware (US)
- Corresponding author
- Scott, Jarrod J.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2015-03-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e0119284
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4356598
- OpenAlex
- W2064773034
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 14.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ScholarWorks @ UTRGV (The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Open Access Server of the Woods Hole Scientific Community (Woods Hole Scientific Community) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1131109, 1155754, 0926805)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX12AG20G)
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- W. M. Keck Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
- Keywords
- Zetaproteobacteria, iron-oxidizing bacteria, Mid-Atlantic Ridge, hydrothermal vents, black smokers, chemolithoautotrophy, iron cycle, iron oxyhydroxide, microbial community diversity, geographic distribution, Rainbow hydrothermal field
- MeSH terms
- Atlantic Ocean, Iron, Molecular Sequence Data, Oxidation-Reduction, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Seawater, Water Microbiology, Proteobacteria, Molecular Typing, Microbial Consortia, Hydrothermal Vents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review