Cited by 56Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

The semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia: Clinical and neuroimaging evidence in single subjects

Open access
Iaccarino, Leonardo, Crespi, Chiara, Della Rosa, Pasquale Anthony, Catricalà, Eleonora, Guidi, Lucia, Marcone, Alessandra, Tagliavini, Fabrizio, Magnani, Giuseppe +2 more·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: We present a clinical-neuroimaging study in a series of patients with a clinical diagnosis of semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), with the aim to provide clinical-functional correlations of the cognitive and behavioral manifestations at the single-subject level. METHODS: We performed neuropsychological investigations, 18F-FDG-PET single-subject and group analysis, with an optimized SPM voxel-based approach, and correlation analyses. A measurement of white matter integrity by means of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was also available for a subgroup of patients. RESULTS: Cognitive assessment confirmed the presence of typical semantic memory deficits in all patients, with a relative sparing of executive, attentional, visuo-constructional, and episodic memory domains. 18F-FDG-PET showed a consistent pattern of cerebral hypometabolism across all patients, which correlated with performance in semantic memory tasks. In addition, a majority of patients also presented with behavioral disturbances associated with metabolic dysfunction in limbic structures. In a subgroup of cases the DTI analysis showed FA abnormalities in the inferior longitudinal and uncinate fasciculi. DISCUSSION: Each svPPA individual had functional derangement involving an extended, connected system within the left temporal lobe, a crucial part of the verbal semantic network, as well as an involvement of limbic structures. The latter was associated with behavioral manifestations and extended beyond the area of atrophy shown by CT scan. CONCLUSION: Single-subject 18F-FDG-PET analysis can account for both cognitive and behavioral alterations in svPPA. This provides useful support to the clinical diagnosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0120197

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 107 · Cited by 56

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [55]Novelli G, Papagno C, Capitani E, Laiacona M, Cappa S, Vallar G. Three clinical tests for the assessment of verbal long term memory function. Norms from 320 normal subjects. Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria. 1986; 47: 278– 96.
  2. [102]Catani M, de Schotten MT. Atlas of human brain connections Oxford University Press; 2012.

Authors
Iaccarino, L., Crespi, C., Della Rosa, P. A., Catricalà, E., Guidi, L., Marcone, A., Tagliavini, F., Magnani, G., Cappa, S. F., & Perani, D.
Affiliations
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
  • Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia (IT)
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (IT)
Corresponding author
Perani, Daniela
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-03-10
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
e0120197
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967811789
Cited by
56
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministero della Salute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
brain hypometabolism, limbic structures, behavioral problems, inferior longitudinal fasciculus, uncinate fasciculus, white matter integrity, left temporal lobe, diffusion tensor imaging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Semantics, Temporal Lobe, Aphasia, Primary Progressive, Radiopharmaceuticals, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-Emission Tomography, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review