The semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia: Clinical and neuroimaging evidence in single subjects
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: We present a clinical-neuroimaging study in a series of patients with a clinical diagnosis of semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), with the aim to provide clinical-functional correlations of the cognitive and behavioral manifestations at the single-subject level. METHODS: We performed neuropsychological investigations, 18F-FDG-PET single-subject and group analysis, with an optimized SPM voxel-based approach, and correlation analyses. A measurement of white matter integrity by means of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was also available for a subgroup of patients. RESULTS: Cognitive assessment confirmed the presence of typical semantic memory deficits in all patients, with a relative sparing of executive, attentional, visuo-constructional, and episodic memory domains. 18F-FDG-PET showed a consistent pattern of cerebral hypometabolism across all patients, which correlated with performance in semantic memory tasks. In addition, a majority of patients also presented with behavioral disturbances associated with metabolic dysfunction in limbic structures. In a subgroup of cases the DTI analysis showed FA abnormalities in the inferior longitudinal and uncinate fasciculi. DISCUSSION: Each svPPA individual had functional derangement involving an extended, connected system within the left temporal lobe, a crucial part of the verbal semantic network, as well as an involvement of limbic structures. The latter was associated with behavioral manifestations and extended beyond the area of atrophy shown by CT scan. CONCLUSION: Single-subject 18F-FDG-PET analysis can account for both cognitive and behavioral alterations in svPPA. This provides useful support to the clinical diagnosis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study's group-level statistical findings can be compared with previous research.
“Moreover, our group-level statistical findings can be compared with previous research (Agosta et al., 2012; Bharti et al., 2017; Iaccarino et al., 2015; Popal et al., 2020; Tovar-Moll et al., 2014; Upadhyay et al., 2016; Whitwell et al., 2009).”
From Multiclass characterization of frontotemporal dementia variants via multimodal brain network computational inference (2023) · cites this paper as Iaccarino et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 107 · Cited by 56
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [55]Novelli G, Papagno C, Capitani E, Laiacona M, Cappa S, Vallar G. Three clinical tests for the assessment of verbal long term memory function. Norms from 320 normal subjects. Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria. 1986; 47: 278– 96.
- [102]Catani M, de Schotten MT. Atlas of human brain connections Oxford University Press; 2012.
- Authors
- Iaccarino, L., Crespi, C., Della Rosa, P. A., Catricalà, E., Guidi, L., Marcone, A., Tagliavini, F., Magnani, G., Cappa, S. F., & Perani, D.
- Affiliations
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
- Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia (IT)
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Perani, Daniela
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2015-03-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e0120197
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4354903
- OpenAlex
- W1967811789
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministero della Salute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Keywords
- brain hypometabolism, limbic structures, behavioral problems, inferior longitudinal fasciculus, uncinate fasciculus, white matter integrity, left temporal lobe, diffusion tensor imaging
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Semantics, Temporal Lobe, Aphasia, Primary Progressive, Radiopharmaceuticals, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-Emission Tomography, Diffusion Tensor Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review