Impact of Facial Conformation on Canine Health: Corneal Ulceration
Open accessAbstract
Concern has arisen in recent years that selection for extreme facial morphology in the domestic dog may be leading to an increased frequency of eye disorders. Corneal ulcers are a common and painful eye problem in domestic dogs that can lead to scarring and/or perforation of the cornea, potentially causing blindness. Exaggerated juvenile-like craniofacial conformations and wide eyes have been suspected as risk factors for corneal ulceration. This study aimed to quantify the relationship between corneal ulceration risk and conformational factors including relative eyelid aperture width, brachycephalic (short-muzzled) skull shape, the presence of a nasal fold (wrinkle), and exposed eye-white. A 14 month cross-sectional study of dogs entering a large UK based small animal referral hospital for both corneal ulcers and unrelated disorders was carried out. Dogs were classed as affected if they were diagnosed with a corneal ulcer using fluorescein dye while at the hospital (whether referred for this disorder or not), or if a previous diagnosis of corneal ulcer(s) was documented in the dogs' histories. Of 700 dogs recruited, measured and clinically examined, 31 were affected by corneal ulcers. Most cases were male (71%), small breed dogs (mean± SE weight: 11.4±1.1 kg), with the most commonly diagnosed breed being the Pug. Dogs with nasal folds were nearly five times more likely to be affected by corneal ulcers than those without, and brachycephalic dogs (craniofacial ratio <0.5) were twenty times more likely to be affected than non-brachycephalic dogs. A 10% increase in relative eyelid aperture width more than tripled the ulcer risk. Exposed eye-white was associated with a nearly three times increased risk. The results demonstrate that artificially selecting for these facial characteristics greatly heightens the risk of corneal ulcers, and such selection should thus be discouraged to improve canine welfare.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Breeding animals with severe skull and muzzle abnormalities leads to physical and physiological hardship and limits their natural behavior.
“Breeding animals with this type of severe skull and muzzle abnormalities leads to physical and physiological hardship and limits their natural behavior [89,90].”
From A One Health Perspective on the Human-Companion Animal Relationship with Emphasis on Zoonotic Aspects. (2020) · cites this paper as [90]
The Conclusions (page unavailable) identify short-muzzled skull shape and related facial traits as risk factors for painful corneal ulcers, supporting a specific form of physical hardship. The paper does not establish broader physiological hardship or limits on natural behavior; its findings concern canine eye health. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- [2]Nicholas FW, Wade CM, Williamson P (2010) Disorders in pedigree dogs: Assembling the evidence. The Veterinary Journal 183: 8– 9. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.11.008 19963416 · DOI
- [4]Gilger BC, editor (2007) Diseases and surgery of the canine cornea 4 ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 690–752 p.
- [5]Martin C (1973) Conjunctivitis. Differential diagnosis and treatment. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 3: 367– 383. 4365710
- [6]Startup FG (1984) Corneal ulceration in the dog. Journal of Small Animal Practice 25: 737– 752.
- [7]Marfurt CF, Murphy CJ, Florczak JL (2001) Morphology and Neurochemistry of Canine Corneal Innervation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 42: 2242– 2251. 11527937
- [8]Slatter D, editor (2001) Eyelids. 3 ed. Philadelphia: Saunders.
- [10]Barnett KC, Sansom J, Heinrich C (2002) Canine Ophthalmology: An Atlas and Text Saunders Book Company.
- [11]Asher L, Diesel G, Summers JF, McGreevy PD, Collins LM (2009) Inherited defects in pedigree dogs. Part 1: Disorders related to breed standards. The Veterinary Journal 182: 402– 411. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.08.033 19836981 · DOI · Paper page
- [16]McGreevy P, Grassi TD, Harman AM (2004) A Strong Correlation Exists between the Distribution of Retinal Ganglion Cells and Nose Length in the Dog. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 63: 13– 22. 14673195
- [17]Bedford P, Jones G, editors (2001) Abnormal appearance 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders. 59 p.
- [18]Maggs D, Miller P, Ofri R, Slatter D (2008) Slatter’s Fundamentals of Veterinary Opthalmology. Edinburgh, UK: Elsevier Health Sciences.
- [20]Gelatt K, Peterson-Gelatt J (2001) Small animal ophthalmic surgery: practical techniques for the veterinarian Edinburgh: Elsevier Science.
- [21]Niles J, editor (2009) Special considerations in wound management 2nd ed: John Wiley & Sons. 233 p.
- [22]Yi NY, Park SA, Jeong MB, Kim SK, Lim JL, Nam TC, et al (2006) Medial Canthoplasty for Epiphora in Dogs: A Retrospective Study of 23 Cases. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 42: 435– 439. 17088390
- [27]Sutter NB, Mosher DS, Gray MM, Ostrander EA (2008) Morphometrics within dog breeds are highly reproducible and dispute Rensch's rule. Mamm Genome 19: 713– 723. 10.1007/s00335-008-9153-6 19020935 PMC2748280 · DOI
- [31]Sutter NB, Mosher DS, Gray MM, Ostrander EA (2008) Morphometrics within dog breeds are highly reproducible and dispute Rensch's rule. Mammalian Genome 19: 713– 723. 10.1007/s00335-008-9153-6 19020935 PMC2748280 · DOI
- [32]Kim JY, Won HJ, Jeong SW (2009) A Retrospective Study of Ulcerative Keratitis in 32 Dogs. International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine 7: 27– 31.
- [34]Bedford PGC (1998) Technique of laternal canthoplasty for the correction of macropalpebral fissure in the dog. Journal of Small Animal Practice 39: 117 9551378
- [35]Lawson D (1973) Canine distichiasis. Journal of Small Animal Practice 14: 469– 468. 4788820
- [37]Carrington S, Bedford P, Guillon J, Woodward E (1989) Biomicroscopy of the tear film: the tear film of the pekingese dog. Veterinary Record 124: 323– 328. 2718323
- [38]Kaswan R, Salisbury M (1990) A new perspective on canine keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Treatment with ophthalmic cyclosporine. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 20: 583– 613. 2194349
- [39]Bjerkas E, Ekesten B, Narfstrom K, Grahn B, editors (2009) Visual Impairment. 4th ed London: Saunders/Elsevier.
- [40]Sanchez R, Innocent G, Mould J, Billson F (2007) Canine keratoconjunctivitis sicca: disease trends in a review of 229 cases. Journal of Small Animal Practice 48: 211– 217. 17381766
- [41]Packer R, Hendricks A, Burn C (2014) Conference Report: Building Better Brachycephalics 2013. North Mymms: Royal Veterinary College. 1–36 p.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Overgaauw, P. A. M., Vinke, C. M., van Hagen, M. A. E., & Lipman, L. J. A. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17113789 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
“Breeding animals with this type of severe skull and muzzle abnormalities leads to physical and physiological hardship and limits their natural behavior [89,90].”
BackgroundImpact of Facial Conformation on Canine Health: Brachycephalic Obstructive Airway Syndrome
Packer, R. M. A., Hendricks, A., Tivers, M. S., & Burn, C. C. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137496 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Packer, R. M. A., Hendricks, A., & Burn, C. C.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Packer, Rowena M. A.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2015-05-13
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e0123827
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4430292
- OpenAlex
- W1600776232
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RVC Research Online (Royal Veterinary College) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Universities Federation for Animal Welfare
- Royal Veterinary College
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Ocular Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- brachycephaly, craniofacial morphology, selective breeding, Pug, dog welfare
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Welfare, Breeding, Cornea, Corneal Ulcer, Craniosynostoses, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Eyelids, Female, Fluorescent Dyes, Male, Phenotype, Risk Factors, Selection, Genetic, Sex Factors, Fluorescein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review