Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Random versus Game Trail-Based Camera Trap Placement Strategy for Monitoring Terrestrial Mammal Communities

Cusack, Jeremy J., Dickman, Amy J., Rowcliffe, J. Marcus, Carbone, Chris, Macdonald, David W., Coulson, Tim·2015·PLOS ONE

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0126373

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on other animals, typically conducted using camera traps, has indicated substantial energetic benefits of trail use.

    “While there are few studies on human trail use, research on other animals, typically conducted using camera traps, has indicated substantial energetic benefits of trail use.”
  • Carnivores and large-bodied predators use trails more than other animals, including their prey, and use large day ranges to hunt.

    “Carnivores and large-bodied predators use trails more than other animals, including their prey (e.g. small ungulates; Cusack et al., 2015; Kays et al., 2011), and use large day ranges to hunt (Carbone, Cowlishaw, Isaac, & Rowcliffe, 2005).”
  • Trails may also aid patrolling behaviour in territorial species, although a study of Tai chimpanzees found that they rarely use paths, including while on patrols.

    “Trails may also aid patrolling behaviour in territorial species (Cusack et al., 2015), although a study of Tai chimpanzees found that they rarely use paths, including while on patrols (Jang, Boesch, Mundry, Ban, & Janmaat, 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. JA Ahumada, 2011, Community structure and diversity of tropical forest mammals: data from a global camera trap network, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 2703, 10.1098/rstb.2011.0115 · DOI
  2. F Rovero, 2014, Estimating species richness and modelling habitat preferences of tropical forest mammals from camera trap data, PloS ONE, 9, e103300, 10.1371/journal.pone.0103300 · DOI
  3. MW Tobler, 2008, An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large- and medium-sized terrestrial rainforest mammals, Animal Conservation, 11, 169, 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00169.x · DOI
  4. JA Ahumada, 2013, Monitoring the status and trends of tropical forest terrestrial vertebrate communities from camera trap data: a tool for conservation, PloS ONE, 8, e73707, 10.1371/journal.pone.0073707 · DOI
  5. JP Jones, 2011, Monitoring species abundance and distribution at the landscape scale, Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 9, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01917.x · DOI
  6. F Rovero, 2013, "Which camera trap type and how many do I need?" A review of camera features and study designs for a range of wildlife research applications, Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 24, 148
  7. BJ Harmsen, 2010, Differential use of trails by forest mammals and the implications for camera traps studies: a case study from Belize, Biotropica, 42, 126, 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00544.x · DOI
  8. OR Wearn, 2013, Assessing the status of wild felids in a highly-disturbed commercial forest reserve in Borneo and the implications for camera trap survey design, PloS ONE, 8, e77598, 10.1371/journal.pone.0077598 · DOI
  9. PD Meek, 2014, Recommended guiding principles for reporting on camera trapping research, Biodiversity and Conservation, 23, 2321, 10.1007/s10531-014-0712-8 · DOI
  10. AM Gopalaswamy, 2012, Program SPACECAP: software for estimating animal density using spatially explicit capture—recapture models, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 1067, 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00241.x · DOI
  11. KU Karanth, 1995, Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture-recapture models, Biological Conservation, 71, 333, 10.1016/0006-3207(94)00057-W · DOI
  12. R Sollmann, 2011, Improving density estimates for elusive carnivores: accounting for sex-specific detection and movements using spatial capture—recapture models for jaguars in central Brazil, Biological Conservation, 144, 1017, 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.011 · DOI
  13. DI MacKenzie, 2002, Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one, Ecology, 83, 2248, 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2248:ESORWD]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  14. R Sollmann, 2012, Using occupancy models to investigate space partitioning between two sympatric large predators, the jaguar and puma in central Brazil, Mammalian Biology-Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 77, 41, 10.1016/j.mambio.2011.06.011 · DOI
  15. JM Rowcliffe, 2013, Clarifying assumptions behind the estimation of animal density from camera trap rates, The Journal of Wildlife Management, 77, 876, 10.1002/jwmg.533 · DOI
  16. AC Srbek-Araujo, 2005, Is camera-trapping an efficient method for surveying mammals in Neotropical forests? A case study in south-eastern Brazil, Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21, 121, 10.1017/S0266467404001956 · DOI
  17. OE Can, 2009, Camera trapping of large mammals in Yenice Forest, Turkey: local information versus camera traps, Oryx, 43, 427, 10.1017/S0030605308000628 · DOI
  18. B Mugerwa, 2012, A camera trap assessment of terrestrial vertebrates in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda, African Journal of Ecology, 51, 21, 10.1111/aje.12004 · DOI
  19. R Kays, 2011, Monitoring wild animal communities with arrays of motion sensitive camera traps, International Journal of Research and Reviews in Wireless Sensor Networks, 1, 19
  20. Kays R, Kranstauber B, Jansen P, Carbone C, Rowcliffe M, Fountain T, et al. (2009) Camera traps as sensor networks for monitoring animal communities. In: Local Computer Networks, IEEE 34th Conference: pp. 811–818. · DOI
  21. MS Di Bitetti, 2014, Camera trap photographic rates on roads vs. off roads: location does matter, Mastozoología Neotropical, 21, 37
  22. JG Blake, 2014, Camera trapping on and off trails in lowland forest of eastern Ecuador: does location matter?, Mastozoología Neotropical, 21, 17
  23. L Abade, 2014, Using landscape and bioclimatic features to predict the distribution of lions, leopards and spotted hyaenas in Tanzania's Ruaha landscape, PloS ONE, 9, e96261, 10.1371/journal.pone.0096261 · DOI
  24. TG O'Brien, 2003, Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape, Animal Conservation, 6, 131, 10.1017/S1367943003003172 · DOI
  25. C Carbone, 2001, The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals, Animal Conservation, 4, 75, 10.1017/S1367943001001081 · DOI
  26. F Rovero, 2009, Camera trapping photographic rate as an index of density in forest ungulates, Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 1011, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01705.x · DOI
  27. RK Colwell, 2004, Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves, Ecology, 85, 2717, 10.1890/03-0557 · DOI
  28. A Chao, 2014, Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species biodiversity studies, Ecological Monographs, 84, 45, 10.1890/13-0133.1 · DOI
  29. P Jaccard, 1912, The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone, New Phytologist, 11, 37, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. JB Wilson, 1991, Methods for fitting dominance/diversity curves, Journal of Vegetation Science, 2, 35, 10.2307/3235896 · DOI
  31. WD Kissling, 2014, Establishing macroecological trait datasets: digitalization, extrapolation, and validation of diet preferences in terrestrial mammals worldwide, Ecology and Evolution, 4, 2913, 10.1002/ece3.1136 · DOI
  32. FA Smith, 2003, Body Mass of Late Quaternary Mammals: Ecological Archives E084-094, Ecology, 84, 3403, 10.1890/02-9003 · DOI
  33. H Akaike, 1974, A new look at the statistical model identification, Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions, 19, 716, 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 · DOI · Paper page
  34. GL Melo, 2012, Use of camera-traps in natural trails and shelters for the mammalian survey in the Atlantic Forest, Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 102, 88, 10.1590/S0073-47212012000100012 · DOI
  35. CS Jennelle, 2002, The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals: a comment on misleading conclusions, Animal Conservation, 5, 119, 10.1017/S1367943002002160 · DOI
  36. R Sollmann, 2013, Risky business or simple solution—Relative abundance indices from camera-trapping, Biological Conservation, 159, 405, 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.025 · DOI
  37. JM Emlen, 1966, The role of time and energy in food preference, The American Naturalist, 100, 611, 10.1086/282455 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cusack, J. J., Dickman, A. J., Rowcliffe, J. M., Carbone, C., Macdonald, D. W., & Coulson, T.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-05-07
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
e0126373
ISSN
1932-6203
Cited by
192
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review