Cited by 56Antimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusAntibiotic Use and ResistanceInfection Control in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Livestock-Associated MRSA in Household Members of Pig Farmers: Transmission and Dynamics of Carriage, A Prospective Cohort Study

Open access
van Cleef, Brigitte A. G. L., van Benthem, Birgit H. B., Verkade, Erwin J. M., van Rijen, Miranda M. L., Kluytmans-van den Bergh, Marjolein F. Q., Graveland, Haitske, Bosch, Thijs, Verstappen, Koen M. H. W., Wagenaar, Jaap A., Bos, Marian E. H., Heederik, Dick, Kluytmans, Jan A. J. W.·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

This prospective cohort study describes carriage of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) in household members from 49 farrowing pig farms in the Netherlands (2010-2011). Of 171 household members, 4% were persistent MRSA nasal carriers, and the MRSA prevalence on any given sampling moment was 10% (range 7-11%). Working in the stables (of which 98% was MRSA-positive, prevalence ratio (PR) = 2.11 per 10 hours), working with sows (PR=1.97), and living with an MRSA-positive pig farmer (PR=4.63) were significant determinants for MRSA carriage. Significant protective factors were carriage of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (PR=0.50), and wearing a facemask when working in the stables (37% decreased prevalence). All MRSA strains during the study period were known livestock-associated types. The bacteriophage φ3 was not found in household members. Transmission from pigs and the environment appeared to be important determinants; human-to-human transmission could not sufficiently be differentiated. Wearing a facemask when working in the stables and carriage of MSSA are potential interventional targets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0127190

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 56

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. K Leonas, 2003, The Relationship of Fabric Properties and Bacterial Filtration Efficiency for Selected Surgical Face Masks, J Text Apparel Technol Manag, 78, 1

Metadata

Authors
van Cleef, B. A. G. L., van Benthem, B. H. B., Verkade, E. J. M., van Rijen, M. M. L., Kluytmans-van den Bergh, M. F. Q., Graveland, H., Bosch, T., Verstappen, K. M. H. W., Wagenaar, J. A., Bos, M. E. H., Heederik, D., & Kluytmans, J. A. J. W.
Affiliations
  • Amphia Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-05-18
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
e0127190
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W289010827
Cited by
56
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
ZonMw (125020009)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
livestock-associated MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, pig farmers, household members, MRSA carriage, zoonotic transmission, human-to-human transmission, nasal carriage, masking, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, pig farms, occupational exposure, infection control
MeSH terms
Farmers, Animals, Carrier State, Humans, Netherlands, Nose, Oropharynx, Prospective Studies, Staphylococcal Infections, Swine, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Livestock

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review