Sex Differences in Clinical Features of Early, Treated Parkinson’s Disease
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: To improve our understanding of sex differences in the clinical characteristics of Parkinson's Disease, we sought to examine differences in the clinical features and disease severity of men and women with early treated Parkinson's Disease (PD) enrolled in a large-scale clinical trial. METHODS: Analysis was performed of baseline data from the National Institutes of Health Exploratory Trials in Parkinson's Disease (NET-PD) Long-term Study-1, a randomized, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 10 grams of oral creatine/day in individuals with early, treated PD. We compared mean age at symptom onset, age at PD diagnosis, and age at randomization between men and women using t-test statistics. Sex differences in clinical features were evaluated, including: symptoms at diagnosis (motor) and symptoms at randomization (motor, non-motor, and daily functioning). RESULTS: 1,741 participants were enrolled (62.5% male). No differences were detected in mean age at PD onset, age at PD diagnosis, age at randomization, motor symptoms, or daily functioning between men and women. Differences in non-motor symptoms were observed, with women demonstrating better performance compared to men on SCOPA-COG (Z = 5.064, p<0.0001) and Symbol Digit Modality measures (Z = 5.221, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, men and women did not demonstrate differences in clinical motor features early in the course of PD. However, the differences observed in non-motor cognitive symptoms suggests further assessment of the influence of sex on non-motor symptoms in later stages of PD is warranted.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In those aged 65 to 69, the incidence of PD is similar between men and women.
“In those aged 65 to 69, the incidence of PD was shown to be similar between men and women [44].”
From Effect of Caffeine Consumption on the Risk for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders: Sex Differences in Human (2020) · cites this paper as [44]
Despite higher incidence of PD in men at all ages, the difference in PD risk between men and women is reduced with age.
“Despite the higher incidence of PD in men at all ages, the difference in PD risk between men and women is reduced with age.”
From Effect of Caffeine Consumption on the Risk for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders: Sex Differences in Human (2020) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 71
- Authors
- Augustine, E. F., Pérez, A., Dhall, R., Umeh, C. C., Videnovic, A., Cambi, F., Wills, A.-M. A., Elm, J. J., Zweig, R. M., Shulman, L. M., Nance, M. A., Bainbridge, J., & Suchowersky, O.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Barrow Neurological Institute (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport (US)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Augustine, Erika F.
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2015-07-14
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e0133002
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4501841
- OpenAlex
- W928008457
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23NS072283, K12NS066098, U01NS043127, U01NS043128)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025758)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, sex differences, non-motor symptoms, cognitive symptoms, motor symptoms, daily functioning, age at symptom onset, age at diagnosis, creatine supplementation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Creatine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review