Cited by 21Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchRetinal Development and DisordersRetinal Diseases and Treatments

Differentiation of human protein-induced pluripotent stem cells toward a retinal pigment epithelial cell fate

Open access
Gong, Jie, Fields, Mark A., Moreira, Ernesto F., Bowrey, Hannah E., Gooz, Monika, Ablonczy, Zsolt, Del Priore, Lucian V.·2015·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Compared with many induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines generated using retrovirus and other non-integrating methods, the utilization of human protein-induced iPSC (piPSC) lines may provide a safer alternative for the generation of retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells for transplantation in retinal degenerative diseases. Here we assess the ability of piPSCs to differentiate into RPE cells, and to perform native RPE cell behavior. piPSCs were seeded in 6-well low-attachment plates to allow embryoid body formation, and then analyzed for pluripotent stem cell markers NANOG, SSEA4 and TRA-1-60 by immunofluorescence. Following colony formation, piPSCs were assessed for confirmation of RPE cell differentiation by staining for zonula occludens (ZO-1), bestrophin, microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) and retinal pigment epithelium specific protein-65 (RPE65). To evaluate piPSC-RPE cell phagocytic ability, adult bovine photoreceptor rod outer segments (ROS) were fed to piPSC-RPE cells, which were analyzed by fluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry. Undifferentiated piPSCs expressed all pluripotent markers assessed and formed embryoid body aggregates after 7 days. Differentiated piPSC-RPE cells expressed ZO-1, bestrophin, MITF and RPE65, typical RPE cell markers. Flow cytometry revealed robust ingestion of fluorescently-labeled ROS by piPSC-RPE cells, which was over four-times greater than that of undifferentiated piPSCs and comparable to that of an immortalized RPE cell line. Phagocytosis activity by piPSC-RPE cells was significantly reduced after the addition of anti-integrin αVβ5. In conclusion, piPSCs can be differentiated toward an RPE cell fate, expressing RPE cell markers and resembling native RPE cells in behavior. These results demonstrate that piPSCs can be differentiated into RPE-like cells using a method that has an increased safety profile, a critical consideration for the development of better treatments for retinal degenerative diseases such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0143272

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Published protocols using directed approaches provide relatively efficient differentiation into cultures of cells reported to possess a wide range of RPE characteristics, including gene expression, polarized organization, and physiological and cell biological functions.

    “There are now published protocols using directed approaches that provide relatively efficient differentiation into cultures of cells, reported to possess a wide range of RPE characteristics, including gene expression, polarized organization, and physiological and cell biological functions (Idelson et al., 2009; Buchholz et al., 2013; Gong et al., 2015; Maruotti et al., 2015; Hazim et al., 2017).”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Gong et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 21

Authors
Gong, J., Fields, M. A., Moreira, E. F., Bowrey, H. E., Gooz, M., Ablonczy, Z., & Del Priore, L. V.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2015-11-25
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
e0143272
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2172916341
Cited by
21
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Research to Prevent Blindness
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • University of South Carolina
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA138313)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
retinal pigment epithelium differentiation, integrin αvβ5, retinal degeneration, age-related macular degeneration, embryoid body formation, RPE65, MITF, bestrophin, ZO-1
MeSH terms
Cell Self Renewal, Animals, Cattle, Cell Differentiation, Cell Line, Transformed, Epithelial Cells, Humans, Phagocytosis, Biomarkers, Immunophenotyping, Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells, Retinal Pigment Epithelium, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review