Cited by 64Muscle Physiology and DisordersMuscle metabolism and nutritionRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Correlation between Ribosome Biogenesis and the Magnitude of Hypertrophy in Overloaded Skeletal Muscle

Open access
Nakada, Satoshi, Ogasawara, Riki, Kawada, Shigeo, Maekawa, Takahiro, Ishii, Naokata·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

External loads applied to skeletal muscle cause increases in the protein translation rate, which leads to muscle hypertrophy. Although some studies have demonstrated that increases in the capacity and efficiency of translation are involved in this process, it remains unclear how these two factors are related to the magnitude of muscle hypertrophy. The present study aimed to clarify the roles played by the capacity and efficiency of translation in muscle hypertrophy. We used an improved synergist ablation in which the magnitude of compensatory hypertrophy could be controlled by partial removal of synergist muscles. Male rats were assigned to four groups in which the plantaris muscle was unilaterally subjected to weak (WK), moderate (MO), middle (MI), and strong (ST) overloading by four types of synergist ablation. Fourteen days after surgery, the weight of the plantaris muscle per body weight increased by 8%, 22%, 32% and 45%, in the WK, MO, MI and ST groups, respectively. Five days after surgery, 18+28S rRNA content (an indicator of translational capacity) increased with increasing overload, with increases of 1.8-fold (MO), 2.2-fold (MI), and 2.5-fold (ST), respectively, relative to non-overloaded muscle (NL) in the WK group. rRNA content showed a strong correlation with relative muscle weight measured 14 days after surgery (r = 0.98). The phosphorylated form of p70S6K (a positive regulator of translational efficiency) showed a marked increase in the MO group, but no further increase was observed with further increase in overload (increases of 22.6-fold (MO), 17.4-fold (MI), and 18.2-fold (ST), respectively, relative to NL in the WK group). These results indicate that increases in ribosome biogenesis at the early phase of overloading are strongly dependent on the amount of overloading, and may play an important role in increasing the translational capacity for further gain of muscular size.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0147284

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • c-Myc induction precedes and obligatorily drives a subsequent elevation in 45S pre-rRNA, which typically peaks between 4 and 12 h post-exercise before returning to baseline.

    “This massive c-Myc induction precedes and obligatorily drives a subsequent, highly significant elevation in 45S pre-rRNA, which typically peaks between 4 and 12 h post-exercise before gradually returning to baseline [85,86].”

    From Ribosome Biogenesis as a Putative Bottleneck to Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: Mechanisms, Human Evidence, and Practical Modulators (2026) · cites this paper as [86]

    The Results and Methods (pages unavailable) measure 18S and 28S rRNA five days after surgical overload, not 45S pre-rRNA in the hours after exercise. Searches for c-Myc, 45S pre-rRNA, and the 4–12-hour time course found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed sequence or obligatory causal role. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 64

Authors
Nakada, S., Ogasawara, R., Kawada, S., Maekawa, T., & Ishii, N.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Teikyo University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nakada, Satoshi
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-01-29
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
e0147284
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2254857256
Cited by
64
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15H03078)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
muscle hypertrophy, ribosome biogenesis, synergist ablation, plantaris muscle, translational capacity, translation efficiency, 28S rRNA, p70S6K phosphorylation, mRNA translation, compensatory hypertrophy
MeSH terms
Animals, Organelle Biogenesis, Hypertrophy, Male, Muscle Proteins, Phosphorylation, Ribosomes, RNA, Ribosomal, 18S, RNA, Ribosomal, 28S, Protein Biosynthesis, Rats, Wistar, Muscle, Skeletal, Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDa, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review