Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 56Hip disorders and treatmentsLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hip Joint Stresses Due to Cam-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review of Finite Element Simulations

Open access
Ng, K. C. Geoffrey, Lamontagne, Mario, Labrosse, Michel R., Beaulé, Paul E.·2016·PLoS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0147813PMC PMC4727804
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cam deformity causes the anterosuperior femoral head to obstruct with the acetabulum, resulting in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and elevated risks of early osteoarthritis. Several finite element models have simulated adverse loading conditions due to cam FAI, to better understand the relationship between mechanical stresses and cartilage degeneration. Our purpose was to conduct a systematic review and examine the previous finite element models and simulations that examined hip joint stresses due to cam FAI. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted to identify those finite element studies of cam-type FAI. The review conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and studies that reported hip joint contact pressures or stresses were included in the quantitative synthesis. RESULTS: Nine articles studied FAI morphologies using finite element methods and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Four articles specifically examined contact pressures and stresses due to cam FAI and were included in the quantitative synthesis. The studies demonstrated that cam FAI resulted in substantially elevated contact pressures (median = 10.4 MPa, range = 8.5-12.2 MPa) and von Mises stresses (median 15.5 MPa, range = 15.0-16.0 MPa) at the acetabular cartilage; and elevated maximum-shear stress on the bone (median = 15.2 MPa, range = 14.3-16.0 MPa), in comparison with control hips, during large amplitudes of hip motions. Many studies implemented or adapted idealized, ball-and-cup, parametric models to predict stresses, along with homogeneous bone material properties and in vivo instrumented prostheses loading data. CONCLUSION: The formulation of a robust subject-specific FE model, to delineate the pathomechanisms of FAI, remains an ongoing challenge. The available literature provides clear insight into the estimated stresses due to the cam deformity and provides an assessment of its risks leading to early joint degeneration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0147813

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig 1 Comparison between a normal and a cam FAI hip. Three-dimensional models representing a healthy, normal left hip joint (A) and a left hip joint with severe cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (B), with the cam deformity highlighted in red.
Fig 1 Comparison between a normal and a cam FAI hip. Three-dimensional models representing a healthy, normal left hip joint (A) and a left hip joint with severe cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (B), with the cam deformity highlighted in red.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 2 Flowchart of selection criteria. According to the PRISMA guidelines, the number of articles started with a total of 2559 combined articles from 3 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library). From those, a total of 9 and 4 articles were included in the qualitative and quantitative syntheses, respectively.
Fig 2 Flowchart of selection criteria. According to the PRISMA guidelines, the number of articles started with a total of 2559 combined articles from 3 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library). From those, a total of 9 and 4 articles were included in the qualitative and quantitative syntheses, respectively.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 3 Summary of previous studies’ peak hip joint contact pressures and stresses. Peak contact pressure or stress on the acetabular cartilage or bone, during a deep hip flexion task for each study’s cam FAI (grey) and control group (white), reporting the averaged peak magnitude and maximum and minimum range. (The von Mises stresses for the control groups were not explicitly reported in Chegini, et al. 2009 and Jorge, et al. 2014, therefore, were intentionally omitted).
Fig 3 Summary of previous studies’ peak hip joint contact pressures and stresses. Peak contact pressure or stress on the acetabular cartilage or bone, during a deep hip flexion task for each study’s cam FAI (grey) and control group (white), reporting the averaged peak magnitude and maximum and minimum range. (The von Mises stresses for the control groups were not explicitly reported in Chegini, et al. 2009 and Jorge, et al. 2014, therefore, were intentionally omitted).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 81 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. M Lamontagne, 2011, Preoperative and Postoperative Lower-Extremity Joint and Pelvic Kinematics During Maximal Squatting of Patients with Cam Femoro-Acetabular Impingement, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 93, 40, 10.2106/JBJS.J.01809 · DOI

Cited by

See all 56

Related

Metadata

Authors
Ng, K. C. G., Lamontagne, M., Labrosse, M. R., & Beaulé, P. E.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Lamontagne, Mario
ORCID
Venue
PLoS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2016-01-26
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
e0147813
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0147813
PMC
PMC4727804
OpenAlex
W2266069582
Cited by
54
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • uO Research (University of Ottawa) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (97778A)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (106769, 106769-2013)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip disorders and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Keywords
cam-type femoroacetabular impingement, von Mises stress, maximum shear stress, hip osteoarthritis, hip biomechanics, finite element model
MeSH terms
Hip Joint, Humans, Models, Biological, Stress, Mechanical, Databases, Factual, Finite Element Analysis, Femoracetabular Impingement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.