Determining connections between the daily lives of zoo elephants and their welfare: an epidemiological approach
Open accessAbstract
Concerns about animal welfare increasingly shape people's views about the acceptability of keeping animals for food production, biomedical research, and in zoos. The field of animal welfare science has developed over the past 50 years as a method of investigating these concerns via research that assesses how living in human-controlled environments influences the behavior, health and affective states of animals. Initially, animal welfare research focused on animals in agricultural settings, but the field has expanded to zoos because good animal welfare is essential to zoos' mission of promoting connections between animals and visitors and raising awareness of conservation issues. A particular challenge for zoos is ensuring good animal welfare for long-lived, highly social species like elephants. Our main goal in conducting an epidemiological study of African (Loxodonta africana) and Asian (Elephas maximus) elephant welfare in 68 accredited North American zoos was to understand the prevalence of welfare indicators in the population and determine the aspects of an elephant's zoo environment, social life and management that are most important to prevent and reduce a variety of welfare problems. In this overview, we provide a summary of the findings of the nine papers in the collection titled: Epidemiological Investigations of North American Zoo Elephant Welfare with a focus on the life history, social, housing, and management factors found to be associated with particular aspects of elephant welfare, including the performance of abnormal behavior, foot and joint problems, recumbence, walking rates, and reproductive health issues. Social and management factors were found to be important for multiple indicators of welfare, while exhibit space was found to be less influential than expected. This body of work results from the largest prospective zoo-based animal welfare study conducted to date and sets in motion the process of using science-based welfare benchmarks to optimize care of zoo elephants.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Measures of space were not identified as risk factors for certain welfare outcomes (e.g., stereotypies, obesity, female reproductive dysfunction) in a study of 68 accredited North American zoos.
“Meehan et al. (2016b) determined that measures of space were not identified as risk factors for certain welfare outcomes (e.g., stereotypies, obesity, female reproductive dysfunction).”
From Continuing challenges of elephant captivity: the captive environment, health issues, and welfare implications (2024) · cites this paper as Meehan et al., 2016b
In zoos, factors other than space have an effect on elephant welfare.
“In zoos, researchers have found that factors other than space have an effect on elephant welfare (Meehan et al., 2016b).”
From Continuing challenges of elephant captivity: the captive environment, health issues, and welfare implications (2024) · cites this paper as Meehan et al., 2016b
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 82
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- [1]Office of the Federal Register. Final rules: Animal Welfare Act: 9 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 1 and 2 Federal Register Vol. 54 No. 168, 31 8 Office of the Federal Register, Washington, DC, 1989 pp. 36112– 36163.
- [6]Fraser D, Duncan IJJ, Edwards SA., Grandin T, Gregory NG, Guyonnet V, Hemsworth PH, Huertas SM, Huzze JM, Mellor JM, Mench JA, Ŝpinka M, Whay HR. General Principles for the welfare of animals in production systems: The underlying science and its application. 2013; Vet. J. 198: 19– 27. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.06.028 23899406 · DOI
- [7]Fraser D. Understanding Animal Welfare The Science in its Cultural Context. Ames, IA: Wiley Blackwell; 2011.
- [8]Mellor DJ, Patterson-Kane E, Stafford KJ. The Sciences of Animal Welfare. Ames, IA: Wiley Blackwell; 2009.
- [9]Mason G, Rushen J. (eds.). Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare. Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CABI; 2008.
- [10]Moberg GP, Mench JA. (eds.). The Biology of Animal Stress: Basic Principles and Implications for Animal Welfare. Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CABI; 2000.
- [11]Ralph CR, Tilbrook JA. The usefulness of measuring glucocorticoids to assess animal welfare. Journal of Animal Science. 2016; 94: 457– 470. 27065116
- [14]Rushen J. Changing concepts of farm animal welfare: bridging the gap between applied and basic research. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2003; 81: 199– 214.
- [15]Millman ST, Johnson AK, O’Connor AM, Zannela AJ. Animal welfare and epidemiology—across species, across disciplines, and across borders. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 2009; 12: 83– 87. 19319710
- [17]Mench JA, Swanson JC, Arnott C. The Coalition for Sustainable Egg Supply: A unique public–private partnership for conducting research on the sustainability of animal housing systems using a multistakeholder approach. Journal of Animal Science. 2016; 10.2527/jas.2015-9680 27065290 · DOI
- [18]Mench JA. Lameness In Measuring and Auditing Broiler Welfare, eds. Weeks C.J. and Butterworth A.. Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CABI 2004; pp. 3– 18.
- [20]Melfi VA. There are big gaps in our knowledge, and thus approach, to zoo animal welfare: a case for evidence-based zoo animal management. 2009; Zoo Biol 28: 574– 588. 10.1002/zoo.20288 19876912 · DOI · Paper page
- [22]Shepherdson D. Principles of and research on environmental enrichment for mammals In: Kleiman DJ, Thompson KV, Baer CK, editors. Wild Mammals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques for Zoo Management. 2nd ed; University of Chicago press (Chicago and London); 2010: 62– 67.
- [24]Clubb R, Mason G. Captivity effects on wide-ranging carnivores. 2003; Nature 425: 473 14523435
- [25]Müller DW, Lackey LB, Streich WJ, Hatt J M, Clauss M. Relevance of management and feeding regimens on life expectancy in captive deer. 2010; Am J Vet Res 71(3): 275– 280. 10.2460/ajvr.71.3.275 20187828 · DOI
- [26]Whitman JC, Wielebnowski N. Animal-based welfare monitoring: Using keeper ratings as an assessment tool. 2009; Zoo Biol 28: 545– 560. 10.1002/zoo.20281 19851995 · DOI · Paper page
- [28]Ward SJ, Melfi V. Keeper-Animal Interactions: Differences between the Behaviour of Zoo Animals Affect Stockmanship. 2015; PloS one 10 10: e0140237 10.1371/journal.pone.0140237 26509670 PMC4624973 · DOI · Paper page
- [30]Carlstead K. A Comparative Approach to the Study of Keeper–Animal Relationships in the Zoo. 2009; Zoo Biol 28: 589– 608. 10.1002/zoo.20289 19885915 · DOI · Paper page
- [32]Davey G. Visitors’ Effects on the Welfare of Animals in the Zoo: A Review. 2007; J Appl Anim Welf Sci 10: 169– 183. 17559323
- [33]Gosling SD. From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research? 2010; Psych Bull 127: 54– 86. 11271756
- [35]Gartner MC, Weiss A. Personality in felids: A review. 2013; Appl Anim Behav Sci 144: 1– 13.
- [36]Weiss A, Adams MJ, King JE. Happy orang-utans live longer lives. 2011; Biol Let, 7 15. PMC3210686 21715398
- [37]Watters JV, Wielebnowski N. Introduction to the special issue on zoo animal welfare. 2011 Zoo Biol 28: 501– 506. 19885912
- [43]Hutchins M, Thompson SD. Zoo and aquarium research: priority setting for the coming decades. 2008; Zoo Biol 27: 488– 497. 10.1002/zoo.20167 19360642 · DOI
- [44]Mason GJ, Veasey JS. What do population-level welfare indices suggest about the well-being of zoo elephants? 2010; Zoo Biol 29: 256– 273. 10.1002/zoo.20303 20140956 · DOI · Paper page
- [46]Clubb R, Rowcliffe M, Lee PC, Mar KU, Moss C, Mason GJ. Compromised survivorship in zoo elephants. 2008; Science 322: 1649 10.1126/science.1164298 19074339 · DOI · Paper page
- [47]Brown JL, Walker SL, Moeller T. Comparative endocrinology of cycling and noncycling Asian (Elephas maximus) and African (Loxodonta africana) elephants. 2004; Gen Comp Endocr 136: 360– 370. 15081836
- [48]Proctor CM, Freeman EW, Brown JL. Results of a second survey to assess the reproductive status of female Asian and African elephants in North America. 2010; Zoo biol 29: 127– 139. 10.1002/zoo.20238 20391465 · DOI
- [51]Ryan SJ, Thompson SD. Disease risk and inter-institutional transfer of specimens in cooperative breeding programs: Herpes in the elephant species survival plans. Zoo Biol. 2001; 20: 89– 101. 11429780
- [52]Mikota SK, Peddie L, Peddie R, Isaza F, Dunker G. West W et al Epidemiology and diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). 2001; J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 32: 1– 16. 12790389
- [53]Clubb R, Rowcliff M, Lee P, Mar KU, Moss C, Mason GA. Compromised survivorship in zoo elephants. 2008; Science 322: 1649 10.1126/science.1164298 19074339 · DOI · Paper page
- [55]Meehan CL, Hogan JN, Bonaparte-Saller MK, Mench JA. Housing and social enviornments of African (Loxodonta africana) and Asian (Elephas maximus) elephants in North American zoos. 2016; PLoS ONE 2016. pone.0146703. PMC4944928 27414034
- [56]Greco BJ, Meehan CL, Miller LJ, Shepherdson DJ, Morfeld KA, Andrews J, et al Elephant management in North American zoos: environmental enrichment, feeding, exercise, and training. 2016; PLoS ONE 2016. pone.0152490. PMC4944993 27414654
- [57]Prado-Oviedo NA, Bonaparte-Saller MK, Malloy EJ, Meehan CL, Mench JA, Carlstead K, et al Evaluation of demographics and social life events of Asian (Elephas maximus) and African elephants (Loxodonta africana) in North American zoos. PloS One 2016. pone.0154750. PMC4945030 27415437
- [61]Holdgate MR, Meehan CL, Hogan JN, Miller LJ, Soltis J, Andrews J, et al Walking behavior of zoo elephants: associations between GPS-measured daily walking distances and environmental factors, social factors and welfare indicators. PLoS ONE 2016. pone.0150331. PMC4944962 27414411
- [62]Holdgate MR, Meehan CL, Hogan JN, Miller LJ, Rushen J, de Passillé AM, et al Recumbence behavior in zoo elephants: determination of patterns and frequency of recumbent rest and associated environmental and social factors. PLoS ONE 2016. pone.0153301. PMC4945027 27414809
- [64]Olson IAS, Westlund K. More than numbers matter: the effect of social factors on behaviour and welfare of laboratory rodents and non-human primates. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2007; 103: 229– 254.
- [65]Price EE, Stoinski TS. Group size: determinants in the wild and implications for the captive housing of wild mammals in zoos. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2007; 103: 255– 264.
- [66]Galindo F, Newberry RC, Mendl M. Social conditions In: Appleby MC, Mench JA, Olsson IAS, Hughes BO, editors. Animal Welfare. 2nd ed Cambridge: CABI Publishing; 2011 pp. 228– 24.
- [67]Rault JL. Friends with benefits: social support and its relevance for farm animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2012; 136: 1– 14.
- [68]Mason GJ, Veasey JS. What do population-level welfare indices suggest about the well-being of zoo elephants? Zoo Biol. 2010; 29: 256– 273. 10.1002/zoo.20303 20140956 · DOI · Paper page
- [69]Morfeld KA, Lehnhardt J, Alligood C, Bolling J, Brown JL. Development of a body condition scoring index for female African elephants validated by ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous fat. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e93802 10.1371/journal.pone.0093802 24718304 PMC3981750 · DOI
- [71]de Silva S, Ranjeewa AD, Kryazhimskiy S. The dynamics of social networks among female Asian elephants. BMC Ecol. 2011; 11: 17 10.1186/1472-6785-11-17 21794147 PMC3199741 · DOI · Paper page
- Authors
- Meehan, C. L., Mench, J. A., Carlstead, K., & Hogan, J. N.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Meehan, Cheryl L.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2016-07-14
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e0158124
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4945044
- OpenAlex
- W2464323207
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 16.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Institute of Museum and Library Services (LG-25-10-0033-10)
- Columbus Zoo and Aquarium
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- Loxodonta africana, Asian elephant, abnormal behavior, reproductive health, social factors, zoo management, welfare indicators
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Behavior, Animal, Elephants, Environment, Housing, Animal, Social Environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review