CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Freshwater Detention by Oyster Reefs: Quantifying a Keystone Ecosystem Service

Kaplan, David A., Olabarrieta, Maitane, Frederick, Peter, Valle-Levinson, Arnoldo·2016·PLOS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0167694PMC PMC5147930
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0167694

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Fig 1 Study area and experimental setup. Salinity was measured at three paired locations on the landward (LAND) and seaward (SEA) side of the Lone Cabbage (LC) Reef, a linear reef chain located ca. 3 km from the mouth of the Suwannee River East Pass. Panel (a) reprinted from [15] under a CC BY license, with permission from BioOne, original copyright 2016. Basemap mosaic in panel (b) from the USGS National Map Viewer.
Fig 1 Study area and experimental setup. Salinity was measured at three paired locations on the landward (LAND) and seaward (SEA) side of the Lone Cabbage (LC) Reef, a linear reef chain located ca. 3 km from the mouth of the Suwannee River East Pass. Panel (a) reprinted from [15] under a CC BY license, with permission from BioOne, original copyright 2016. Basemap mosaic in panel (b) from the USGS National Map Viewer.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 2 (a) ROMS model bathymetry, boundary conditions, and synthetic monitoring points (LC1, LC2, LC3). (b) Comparison of landward (LAND) and seaward (SEA) salinities between paired synthetic monitoring stations under the present reef configuration (Run 2), with different values of river discharge (5, 10 and 20 m3/s).
Fig 2 (a) ROMS model bathymetry, boundary conditions, and synthetic monitoring points (LC1, LC2, LC3). (b) Comparison of landward (LAND) and seaward (SEA) salinities between paired synthetic monitoring stations under the present reef configuration (Run 2), with different values of river discharge (5, 10 and 20 m3/s).CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 3 (a) Tide-filtered mean daily salinity over the 18-month period of record for the six monitoring locations in the Suwannee Sound. (b-d) Comparison of landward (LAND) and seaward (SEA) salinities between paired stations, illustrating a marked freshwater detention effect close to the mouth of the Suwannee River East Pass (LC1) that declines with distance (LC2) and becomes negligible at LC3.
Fig 3 (a) Tide-filtered mean daily salinity over the 18-month period of record for the six monitoring locations in the Suwannee Sound. (b-d) Comparison of landward (LAND) and seaward (SEA) salinities between paired stations, illustrating a marked freshwater detention effect close to the mouth of the Suwannee River East Pass (LC1) that declines with distance (LC2) and becomes negligible at LC3.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 4 (a) Modeled daily-average subtidal salinities across four reef geometries (Runs 1, 2, 9, and 10) under freshwater discharge of 10 m3s-1. (b). Comparison of modeled landward vs. seaward salinities at LC1 illustrate effects of reef height, inlet width, and reef width under a variety of flow regimes (5, 10, and 20 m3s-1).
Fig 4 (a) Modeled daily-average subtidal salinities across four reef geometries (Runs 1, 2, 9, and 10) under freshwater discharge of 10 m3s-1. (b). Comparison of modeled landward vs. seaward salinities at LC1 illustrate effects of reef height, inlet width, and reef width under a variety of flow regimes (5, 10, and 20 m3s-1).CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 5 Daily-average subtidal flow velocities for Run 2 (short-reef case, blue) and Run 10 (long-reef, red), illustrating strong counter-clockwise circulation in the short-reef case that is absent when the reef fully extends across the domain.
Fig 5 Daily-average subtidal flow velocities for Run 2 (short-reef case, blue) and Run 10 (long-reef, red), illustrating strong counter-clockwise circulation in the short-reef case that is absent when the reef fully extends across the domain.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. LD Coen, 2007, Ecosystem Services Related to Oyster Restoration, MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 341, 303, 10.3354/meps341303 · DOI · Paper page
  2. SB Scyphers, 2011, Oyster reefs as natural breakwaters mitigate shoreline loss and facilitate fisheries, PLoS One, 6, e22396, 10.1371/journal.pone.0022396 · DOI
  3. ML Kellogg, 2013, Denitrification and nutrient assimilation on a restored oyster reef, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 480, 1, 10.3354/meps10331 · DOI
  4. MW Beck, 2011, Oyster Reefs at Risk and Recommendations for Conservation, Restoration, and Management, BioScience, 61, 107, 10.1525/bio.2011.61.2.5 · DOI
  5. MX Kirby, 2004, Fishing down the coast: historical expansion and collapse of oyster fisheries along continental margins, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101, 13096, 10.1073/pnas.0405150101 · DOI · Paper page
  6. DM Bilkovic, 2008, Effects of coastal development on nearshore estuarine nekton communities, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 358, 27, 10.3354/meps07279 · DOI
  7. JR Seavey, 2011, Decadal changes in oyster reefs in the Big Bend of Florida's Gulf Coast, Ecosphere, 2, art114, 10.1890/ES11-00205.1 · DOI · Paper page
  8. SC Talmage, 2009, The effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentrations on the metamorphosis, size, and survival of larval hard clams (Mercenaria mercenaria), bay scallops (Argopecten irradians), and Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica), Limnology and Oceanography, 54, 2072, 10.4319/lo.2009.54.6.2072 · DOI · Paper page
  9. EV Camp, 2015, Collapse of a historic oyster fishery: diagnosing causes and identifying paths toward increased resilience, Ecology and Society, 20
  10. PS Zu Ermgassen, 2012, Historical ecology with real numbers: past and present extent and biomass of an imperilled estuarine habitat, Proc Biol Sci, 279, 3393, 10.1098/rspb.2012.0313 · DOI
  11. J van de Koppel, 2015, Long-distance interactions regulate the structure and resilience of coastal ecosystems, Ann Rev Mar Sci, 7, 139, 10.1146/annurev-marine-010814-015805 · DOI
  12. JH Grabowski, 2012, Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services Provided by Oyster Reefs, Bioscience, 62, 900, 10.1525/bio.2012.62.10.10 · DOI · Paper page
  13. EE Wright, 2005, The effect of sea-level and climate change on the development of a mixed siliciclastic–carbonate, deltaic coastline: Suwannee River, Florida, USA, Journal of Sedimentary Research, 75, 621, 10.2110/jsr.2005.051 · DOI
  14. P Frederick, 2016, Reversing a Rapid Decline in Oyster Reefs: Effects of Durable Substrate on Oyster Populations, Elevations, and Aquatic Bird Community Composition, J Shellfish Res, 35, 359, 10.2983/035.035.0210 · DOI · Paper page
  15. EP Chassignet, 2000, DAMEE-NAB: the base experiments, Dynam Atmos Oceans, 32, 155, 10.1016/S0377-0265(00)00046-4 · DOI
  16. DB Haidvogel, 2000, Model evaluation experiments in the North Atlantic Basin: simulations in nonlinear terrain-following coordinates, Dynam Atmos Oceans, 32, 239, 10.1016/S0377-0265(00)00049-X · DOI
  17. DB Haidvogel, 2008, Ocean forecasting in terrain-following coordinates: Formulation and skill assessment of the Regional Ocean Modeling System, J Comput Phys, 227, 3595, 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.06.016 · DOI
  18. R Styles, 2015, Flow and Turbulence over an Oyster Reef, J Coastal Res, 31, 978, 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-14-00115.1 · DOI
  19. PA Madsen, 1988, Subgrid modelling in depth integrated flows, Coastal Engineering Proceedings, 1, 10.9753/icce.v21.35 · DOI
  20. M Scheffer, 2001, Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems, Nature, 413, 591, 10.1038/35098000 · DOI · Paper page
  21. MM Dekshenieks, 2000, Quantifying the effects of environmental change on an oyster population: A modeling study, Estuaries, 23, 593, 10.2307/1352887 · DOI
  22. RJ Livingston, 2000, Modelling oyster population response to variation in freshwater input, Estuar Coast Shelf S, 50, 655, 10.1006/ecss.1999.0597 · DOI
  23. H Wang, 2008, Modeling oyster growth rate by coupling oyster population and hydrodynamic models for Apalachicola Bay, Florida, USA, Ecological Modelling, 211, 77, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.08.018 · DOI
  24. AB Rodriguez, 2014, Oyster reefs can outpace sea-level rise, Nature Climate Change, 4, 493, 10.1038/nclimate2216 · DOI
  25. DPF McCay, 2003, Restoration that targets function as opposed to structure: replacing lost bivalve production and filtration, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 264, 197, 10.3354/meps264197 · DOI
  26. SG Tolley, 2005, The role of oysters in habitat use of oyster reefs by resident fishes and decapod crustaceans, J Shellfish Res, 24, 1007, 10.2983/0730-8000(2005)24[1007:TROOIH]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  27. Blair S AC, Ankersen T, McGuire M, Kaplan D. Ecosystem services valuation for estuarine and coastal restoration in Florida. Florida Sea Grant /IFAS Extension Publication [Internet]. 2015; TP-204. Available from: http://edis/ifas/ufl.edu/sg134. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kaplan, D. A., Olabarrieta, M., Frederick, P., & Valle-Levinson, A.
ORCID
Kaplan, David A.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2016-12-09
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
e0167694
ISSN
1932-6203
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0167694
PMC
PMC5147930
Cited by
25
References
0
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
Florida Sea Grant, University of Florida (US) (GM02389)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review