The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overtreatment in the United States
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Overtreatment is a cause of preventable harm and waste in health care. Little is known about clinician perspectives on the problem. In this study, physicians were surveyed on the prevalence, causes, and implications of overtreatment. METHODS: 2,106 physicians from an online community composed of doctors from the American Medical Association (AMA) masterfile participated in a survey. The survey inquired about the extent of overutilization, as well as causes, solutions, and implications for health care. Main outcome measures included: percentage of unnecessary medical care, most commonly cited reasons of overtreatment, potential solutions, and responses regarding association of profit and overtreatment. FINDINGS: The response rate was 70.1%. Physicians reported that an interpolated median of 20.6% of overall medical care was unnecessary, including 22.0% of prescription medications, 24.9% of tests, and 11.1% of procedures. The most common cited reasons for overtreatment were fear of malpractice (84.7%), patient pressure/request (59.0%), and difficulty accessing medical records (38.2%). Potential solutions identified were training residents on appropriateness criteria (55.2%), easy access to outside health records (52.0%), and more practice guidelines (51.5%). Most respondents (70.8%) believed that physicians are more likely to perform unnecessary procedures when they profit from them. Most respondents believed that de-emphasizing fee-for-service physician compensation would reduce health care utilization and costs. CONCLUSION: From the physician perspective, overtreatment is common. Efforts to address the problem should consider the causes and solutions offered by physicians.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Graphical Methods for Data Analysis.
Healy, M. J. R., Chambers, J. M., Cleveland, W. S., Kleiner, B., & Tukey, P. A. (1984) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2981587 · Cited by 2,315
Graphical Methods for Data Analysis.
Fisher, N. I., Chambers, J. M., Cleveland, W. S., Kleiner, B., & Tukey, P. A. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531418 · Cited by 1,982
Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-3277 · Cited by 1,363
Walker, J., Pan, E., Johnston, D., Adler-Milstein, J., Bates, D. W., & Middleton, B. (2005) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.w5.10 · Cited by 811
Wennberg, J. E., Fisher, E. S., & Skinner, J. S. (2002) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.w2.96 · Cited by 592
Hecker, M. T., Aron, D. C., Patel, N. P., Lehmann, M. K., & Donskey, C. J. (2003) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.163.8.972 · Cited by 495
Gosden, T., Forland, F., Kristiansen, I., Sutton, M., Leese, B., Giuffrida, A., Sergison, M., & Pedersen, L. (2000) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002215 · Cited by 428
Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Chan, P. S., Patel, M. R., Klein, L. W., Krone, R. J., Dehmer, G. J., Kennedy, K., Nallamothu, B. K., Weaver, W. D., Masoudi, F. A., Rumsfeld, J. S., et al. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.916 · Cited by 367
Lehnert, B. E., & Bree, R. L. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2009.11.010 · Cited by 303
Choosing Wisely — The Politics and Economics of Labeling Low-Value Services
Morden, N. E., Colla, C. H., Sequist, T. D., & Rosenthal, M. B. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1314965 · Cited by 247
Cited by
Report of the Lancet Commission on the Value of Death: Bringing death back into life
Sallnow, L., Smith, R., Ahmedzai, S. H., Bhadelia, A., Chamberlain, C., Cong, Y., Doble, B., Dullie, L., Durie, R., Finkelstein, E. A., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02314-x · Cited by 807
(2021) · doi:10.2196/24372 · Cited by 25
The economics of diagnostic safety
Slawomirski, L., Kelly, D., de Bienassis, K., Kallas, K.-A., & Klazinga, N. (2025) · OECD Health Working Papers · doi:10.1787/fc61057a-en · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyu, H., Xu, T., Brotman, D., Mayer-Blackwell, B., Cooper, M., Daniel, M., Wick, E. C., Saini, V., Brownlee, S., & Makary, M. A.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2017-09-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e0181970
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2750641773
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 50.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overtreatment in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0181970
- The paper
- Lyu, H., Xu, T., Brotman, D., Mayer-Blackwell, B., Cooper, M., Daniel, M., Wick, E. C., Saini, V., Brownlee, S., & Makary, M. A. (2017). Overtreatment in the United States. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181970
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.