Cited by 114Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsRenal cell carcinoma treatmentNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments

Validation of pathological grading systems for predicting metastatic potential in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

Open access
Koh, Jung-Min, Ahn, Seong Hee, Kim, Hyeonmok, Kim, Beom-Jun, Sung, Tae-Yon, Kim, Young Hoon, Hong, Suck Joon, Song, Dong Eun +1 more·2017·PLoS ONE

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Grading system for Adrenal Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma (GAPP) was proposed for predicting the metastatic potential of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma to overcome the limitations of the Pheochromocytoma of the Adrenal Scaled Score (PASS). However, to date, no study validating the GAPP has been conducted, and previous studies did not include mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase type B (SDHB) gene in the score calculation. In this retrospective cohort study, we validated the prediction ability of GAPP and assessed whether it would be improved by inclusion of the loss of SDHB immunohistochemical staining. METHODS: We divided the tumors into non-metastatic and metastatic groups based on the presence of synchronous or metachronous metastases. The GAPP score and PASS at the initial operation were measured. Moreover, we combined some GAPP parameters with the immunohistochemical staining of SDHB to obtain a modified GAPP (M-GAPP) score. RESULTS: Metastasis occurred in 15/72 (20.8%) patients, with a mean follow-up of 43.5 months. Loss of SDHB staining was more frequent (P = 0.044) in the metastatic group. The GAPP score (P = 0.006), PASS (P = 0.003), and M-GAPP score (P<0.001) were all higher in the metastatic group. Twelve of 40 (30.0%) moderately or poorly differentiated tumors, as defined by the GAPP score, and 12/34 (35.3%) tumors with a PASS ≥4 were metastatic. Conversely, 10/19 (52.6%) tumors with an M-GAPP score ≥3 were metastatic. The area under the curve of the M-GAPP score (0.822) was significantly higher than that of the GAPP (0.728) (P = 0.012), but similar to that of the PASS (0.753) (P = 0.411). The GAPP (P = 0.032) and M-GAPP scores (P = 0.040), but not PASS (P = 0.200), negatively correlated with metastasis-free survival. CONCLUSION: The GAPP was validated, and M-GAPP, a combination of some GAPP parameters and loss of SDHB staining, might be useful for the prediction of the metastatic potential of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0187398

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GAPP scoring was independently validated by Koh et al. and is considered a useful risk stratification tool for the prediction of metastatic potential.

    “GAPP scoring was independently validated by Koh et al. and is considered a useful risk stratification tool for the prediction of metastatic potential (122).”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [122]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 114

Authors
Koh, J.-M., Ahn, S. H., Kim, H., Kim, B.-J., Sung, T.-Y., Kim, Y. H., Hong, S. J., Song, D. E., & Lee, S. H.
Affiliations
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • Inha University (KR)
  • Gyeongsang National University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Song, Dong Eun
  • Lee, Seung Hun
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2017-11-08
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
e0187398
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767206373
Cited by
114
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center (2016-0840)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Keywords
pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, metastatic potential, tumor grade, PASS score, SDHB immunohistochemistry, SDHB mutation, metastasis prediction, metastasis-free survival, tumor differentiation, adrenal tumors, synchronous and metachronous metastases
MeSH terms
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Adult, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Paraganglioma, Pheochromocytoma, ROC Curve, Succinate Dehydrogenase, Reproducibility of Results, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review