CT scan exposure in Spanish children and young adults by socioeconomic status: Cross-sectional analysis of cohort data
Open accessAbstract
Recent publications reported that children in disadvantaged areas undergo more CT scanning than others. The present study is aimed to assess the potential differences in CT imaging by socioeconomic status (SES) in Spanish young scanned subjects and if such differences vary with different indicators or different time point SES measurements. The associations between CT scanning and SES, and between the CT scan rate per patient and SES were investigated in the Spanish EPI-CT subcohort. Various SES indicators were studied to determine whether particular SES dimensions were more closely related to the probability of undergoing one or multiple CTs. Comparisons were made with indices based on 2001 and 2011 censuses. We found evidence of socio-economic variation among young people, mainly related to autonomous communities of residence. A slightly higher rate of scans per patient of multiple body parts in the less affluent categories was observed, possibly reflecting a higher rate of accidents and violence in these groups. The number of CT scans per patient was higher both in the most affluent and the most deprived categories and somewhat lower in the intermediate groups. This relation varied with the SES indicator used, with lower CT scans per patients in categories of high unemployment and temporary work, but not depending on categories of unskilled work or illiteracy. The relationship between these indicators and number of CTs in 2011 was different than that seen with the 2001 census, with the number of CTs increasing with higher unemployment. Overall we observed some differences in the SES distribution of scanned patients by Autonomous Community in Spain. There was, however, no major differences in the frequency of CT scans per patient by SES overall, based on the 2001 census. The use of different indicators and of SES data collected at different time points led to different relations between SES and frequency of CT scans, outlining the difficulty of adequately capturing the social and economic dimensions which may affect health and health service utilisation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Residual confounding of the relation between CT radiation dose and risk of hematological malignancies is unlikely to be substantial, particularly since the evidence for an association between socioeconomic determinants and risk of leukemia in young people is inconsistent.
“Residual confounding of the relation between CT radiation dose and risk of hematological malignancies is therefore unlikely to be substantial, particularly since the evidence for an association between different determinants of SES and risk of leukemia (and more generally hematological malignancies) in young people is inconsistent36.”
From Risk of hematological malignancies from CT radiation exposure in children, adolescents and young adults (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Bosch de Basea, M., Espinosa, A., Gil, M., Figuerola, J., Pardina, M., Vilar, J., & Cardis, E.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
- Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova (ES)
- Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset (ES)
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2018-05-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e0196449
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5933709
- OpenAlex
- W2801276003
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Repositori ObertUDL (University of Lleida) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (269912)
- Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
- CERCA Programme / Generalitat de Catalunya
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
- Keywords
- socioeconomic status, health disparities, children and young adults, socioeconomic deprivation, unemployment, temporary work, autonomous communities, health care utilization, radiation exposure, Spain
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Social Class, Spain, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Unemployment, Cohort Studies, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review