Cited by 24Cellular transport and secretionAutophagy in Disease and TherapyExtracellular vesicles in disease

Intracellular redistribution of neuronal peroxisomes in response to ACBD5 expression

Open access
Wang, Yunhong, Metz, Jeremy, Costello, Joseph L., Passmore, Josiah, Schrader, Michael, Schultz, Christian, Islinger, Markus·2018·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Peroxisomes can be frequently found in proximity to other subcellular organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), mitochondria or lysosomes. The tail-anchored protein ACBD5 was recently identified as part of a tethering complex at peroxisome-ER contact sites, interacting with the ER resident protein VAPB. Contact site disruption was found to significantly increase peroxisome motility, apparently interfering with intracellular positioning systems. Unlike other somatic cells, neurons have to distribute organelles across relatively long distances in order to maintain their extraordinary cellular polarity. Using confocal live imaging microscopy in cultured hippocampal neurons we observed that peroxisomes and mitochondria show a strikingly similar motility with approximately 10% performing microtubule-driven long range movements. In order to investigate if ER contacts influence overall peroxisome motility and cellular distribution patterns, hippocampal neurons were transfected with plasmids encoding ACBD5 to stimulate peroxisome-ER interactions. Overexpression of ACBD5 reduced peroxisomal long range movements in the neurites of the hippocampal cells by 70%, implying that ER attachment counteracts microtubule-driven peroxisome transport, while mitochondrial motility was unaffected. Moreover, the analyses of peroxisome distribution in fixed neurons unveiled a significant redistribution of peroxisomes towards the periphery of the perikaryon underneath the plasma membrane and into neurites, where peroxisomes are frequently found in close proximity to mitochondria. Surprisingly, further analysis of peroxisome and VAPB distribution upon ACBD5 expression did not reveal a substantial colocalization, implying this effect may be independent of VAPB. In line with these findings, expression of an ACBD5 variant unable to bind to VAPB still altered the localization of peroxisomes in the same way as the wild-type ACBD5. Thus, we conclude, that the VAPB-ACBD5 facilitated peroxisome-ER interaction is not responsible for the observed organelle redistribution in neurons. Rather, we suggest that additional ACBD5-binding proteins in neurons may tether peroxisomes to contact sites at or near the plasma membrane of neurons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0209507

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peroxisomes are few in neuron perikarya or dendrites, rare within axons, and absent in synaptic terminals in the spinal cord except during early development.

    “While mitochondria fill dendrites and axons, peroxisomes are few in neuron perikarya or dendrites, rare within axons [251,253,254,255,292,293], and absent in synaptic terminals in the spinal cord [255] except during early development [255].”

    From Revisiting the Pathogenesis of X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (2025) · cites this paper as [293]

    The Introduction says peroxisomes are virtually absent from axons in mature projection neurons and accumulate in axon terminals during early postnatal development. It does not establish that they are few in perikarya or dendrites. The spinal-cord-specific statement is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence and is not assessed against this paper. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. [1]van Beuningen SF, Hoogenraad CC. Neuronal polarity: remodeling microtubule organization. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2016; 39: 1– 7. 10.1016/j.conb.2016.02.003 26945466 · DOI
  2. [2]Sheng ZH, Cai Q. Mitochondrial transport in neurons: impact on synaptic homeostasis and neurodegeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012; 13: 77– 93. 10.1038/nrn3156 22218207 PMC4962561 · DOI
  3. [3]Kang JS, Tian JH, Pan PY, Zald P, Li C, Deng C, et al Docking of axonal mitochondria by syntaphilin controls their mobility and affects short-term facilitation. Cell. 2008; 132: 137– 148. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.024 18191227 PMC2259239 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Valm AM, Cohen S, Legant WR, Melunis J, Hershberg U, Wait E, et al Applying systems-level spectral imaging and analysis to reveal the organelle interactome. Nature. 2017; 546: 162– 167. 10.1038/nature22369 28538724 PMC5536967 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Islinger M, Grille S, Fahimi HD, Schrader M. The peroxisome: an update on mysteries. Histochem Cell Biol. 2012; 137: 547– 574. 10.1007/s00418-012-0941-4 22415027 · DOI
  6. [6]Trompier D, Vejux A, Zarrouk A, Gondcaille C, Geillon F, Nury T, et al Brain peroxisomes. Biochimie. 2014; 98: 102– 10. 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.09.009 24060512 · DOI
  7. [8]De Munter S, Bamps D, Malheiro AR, Kumar Baboota R, Brites P, Baes M. Autonomous Purkinje cell axonal dystrophy causes ataxia in peroxisomal multifunctional protein‐2 deficiency. Brain Pathol. 2018; 28: 631– 643. 10.1111/bpa.12586 29341299 PMC8028635 · DOI
  8. [9]Diano S, Liu ZW, Jeong JK, Dietrich MO, Ruan HB, Kim E, et al Peroxisome proliferation-associated control of reactive oxygen species sets melanocortin tone and feeding in diet-induced obesity. Nat Med. 2011; 17: 1121– 1127. 10.1038/nm.2421 21873987 PMC3388795 · DOI
  9. [10]Kredel S, Oswald F, Nienhaus K, Deuschle K, Rocker C, Wolff M, et al mRuby, a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for labeling of subcellular structures. PloS one. 2009; 4: e4391 10.1371/journal.pone.0004391 19194514 PMC2633614 · DOI
  10. [11]Arnold G, Holtzman E. Microperoxisomes in the central nervous system of the postnatal rat. Brain Res. 1978; 155: 1– 17. 688002
  11. [12]Kassmann CM, Quintes S, Rietdorf J, Mobius W, Sereda MW, Nientiedt T, et al A role for myelin-associated peroxisomes in maintaining paranodal loops and axonal integrity. FEBS letters. 2011; 585: 2205– 2211. 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.05.032 21620837 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [13]Stamer K, Vogel R, Thies E, Mandelkow E, Mandelkow E-M. Tau blocks traffic of organelles, neurofilaments, and APP vesicles in neurons and enhances oxidative stress. J Cell Biol. 2002; 156: 1051– 1063. 10.1083/jcb.200108057 11901170 PMC2173473 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [14]Van Bergeijk P, Adrian M, Hoogenraad CC, Kapitein LC. Optogenetic control of organelle transport and positioning. Nature. 2015; 518: 111– 114. 10.1038/nature14128 25561173 PMC5063096 · DOI
  14. [15]Novikoff A, Shin W-Y. The endoplasmic reticulum in the Golgi zone and its relations to microbodies, Golgi apparatus and autophagic vacuoles in rat liver cells. J Microsc. 1964; 3: 187– 206.
  15. [16]Costello JL, Castro IG, Hacker C, Schrader TA, Metz J, Zeuschner D, et al ACBD5 and VAPB mediate membrane associations between peroxisomes and the ER. J Cell Biol. 2017; 216: 331– 342. 28108524 PMC5294785
  16. [17]Hua R, Cheng D, Coyaud É, Freeman S, Di Pietro E, Wang Y, et al VAPs and ACBD5 tether peroxisomes to the ER for peroxisome maintenance and lipid homeostasis. J Cell Biol. 2017; 216: 367– 377. 28108526 PMC5294787
  17. [18]Nishimura AL, Mitne-Neto M, Silva HC, Richieri-Costa An, Middleton S, Cascio D, et al A mutation in the vesicle-trafficking protein VAPB causes late-onset spinal muscular atrophy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am J Hum Genet. 2004; 75: 822– 831. 10.1086/425287 15372378 PMC1182111 · DOI
  18. [19]Ferdinandusse S, Falkenberg KD, Koster J, Mooyer PA, Jones R, van Roermund CW, et al ACBD5 deficiency causes a defect in peroxisomal very long-chain fatty acid metabolism. J Med Genet. 2016; 54: 330– 337. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104132 27799409 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [20]Olenych SG, Claxton NS, Ottenberg GK, Davidson MW. The fluorescent protein color palette. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2007; 36: 21.5. 1.– 5. 34. 18228502
  20. [21]Banker G, Goslin K, Stevens CF. Culturing nerve cells: MIT press; 1998.
  21. [22]Sun M, Bernard LP, Dibona VL, Wu Q, Zhang H. Calcium phosphate transfection of primary hippocampal neurons. J Vis Exp. 2013; 12: e50808. PMC3989506 24300106
  22. [23]Frangi AF, Niessen WJ, Vincken KL, Viergever MA. Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering In: Wells W.M., Colchester A., Delp S. (eds) Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI’98. MICCAI 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1998;vol 1496. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  23. [24]Canny J. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1986: 679– 698. 21869365
  24. [25]Lindeberg T. Scale-space theory: A basic tool for analyzing structures at different scales. J Appl Stat. 1994; 21: 225– 270.
  25. [26]Islinger M, Godinho LF, Costello J, Schrader M. The different facets of organelle interplay—an overview of organelle interactions. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2015; 3: 56 10.3389/fcell.2015.00056 26442263 PMC4585249 · DOI
  26. [27]Stefan CJ, Trimble WS, Grinstein S, Drin G, Reinisch K, De Camilli P, et al Membrane dynamics and organelle biogenesis—lipid pipelines and vesicular carriers. BMC Biol. 2017; 15: 102 10.1186/s12915-017-0432-0 29089042 PMC5663033 · DOI
  27. [28]Waterham HR, Ferdinandusse S, Wanders RJA. Human disorders of peroxisome metabolism and biogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016; 1863: 922– 933. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.11.015 26611709 · DOI
  28. [29]Eisenberg-Bord M, Shai N, Schuldiner M, Bohnert M. A tether is a tether is a tether: tethering at membrane contact sites. Dev Cell. 2016; 39: 395– 409. 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.10.022 27875684 · DOI
  29. [30]Greengard P. The neurobiology of slow synaptic transmission. Science. 2001; 294: 1024– 30. 10.1126/science.294.5544.1024 11691979 · DOI
  30. [31]Wiemer EA, Wenzel T, Deerinck TJ, Ellisman MH, Subramani S. Visualization of the peroxisomal compartment in living mammalian cells: dynamic behavior and association with microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1997; 136: 71– 80. 9008704 PMC2132450
  31. [32]Kural C, Kim H, Syed S, Goshima G, Gelfand VI, Selvin PR. Kinesin and dynein move a peroxisome in vivo: a tug-of-war or coordinated movement? Science. 2005; 308: 1469– 1472. 10.1126/science.1108408 15817813 · DOI
  32. [33]Okumoto K, Ono T, Toyama R, Shimomura A, Nagata A, Fujiki Y. New splicing variants of mitochondrial Rho GTPase-1 (Miro1) transport peroxisomes. J Cell Biol. 2017; 217: 619– 633. 10.1083/jcb.201708122 29222186 PMC5800816 · DOI
  33. [34]Melkov A, Abdu U. Regulation of long-distance transport of mitochondria along microtubules. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018; 75: 163– 176. 10.1007/s00018-017-2590-1 28702760 PMC11105322 · DOI
  34. [35]Rapp S, Saffrich R, Anton M, Jakle U, Ansorge W, Gorgas K, et al Microtubule-based peroxisome movement. J Cell Sci. 1996; 109: 837– 849. 8718675
  35. [36]Costello JL, Castro IG, Hacker C, Schrader TA, Metz J, Zeuschner D, et al ACBD5 and VAPB mediate membrane associations between peroxisomes and the ER. J Cell Biol. 2017; 216: 331– 342. 28108524 PMC5294785
  36. [37]Kuijpers M, Yu KL, Teuling E, Akhmanova A, Jaarsma D, Hoogenraad CC. The ALS8 protein VAPB interacts with the ER–Golgi recycling protein YIF1A and regulates membrane delivery into dendrites. EMBO J. 2013; 32: 2056– 2072. 10.1038/emboj.2013.131 23736259 PMC3715857 · DOI
  37. [38]Murphy SE, Levine TP. VAP, a versatile access point for the endoplasmic reticulum: review and analysis of FFAT-like motifs in the VAPome. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016; 1861: 952– 961. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2016.02.009 26898182 · DOI
  38. [39]Jourdain I, Sontam D, Johnson C, Dillies C, Hyams JS. Dynamin‐dependent biogenesis, cell cycle regulation and mitochondrial association of peroxisomes in fission yeast. Traffic. 2008; 9: 353– 365. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00685.x 18088324 · DOI
  39. [40]Valm AM, Cohen S, Legant WR, Melunis J, Hershberg U, Wait E, et al Applying systems-level spectral imaging and analysis to reveal the organelle interactome. Nature. 2017; 546: 162– 167. 10.1038/nature22369 28538724 PMC5536967 · DOI · Paper page
  40. [41]Gatta AT, Levine TP. Piecing together the patchwork of contact sites. Trends Cell Biol. 2017; 27: 214– 229. 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.08.010 27717534 · DOI
  41. [42]Bonifacino JS, Neefjes J. Moving and positioning the endolysosomal system. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2017; 47: 1– 8. 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.01.008 28231489 PMC5537022 · DOI
  42. [43]van Vliet AR, Sassano ML, Agostinis P. The Unfolded Protein Response and Membrane Contact Sites: Tethering as a Matter of Life and Death? Contact. 2018; 1:2515256418770512.
  43. [44]Castro IG, Richards DM, Metz J. A role for Mitochondrial Rho GTPase 1 (MIRO1) in motility and membrane dynamics of peroxisomes. Traffic. 2018; 19: 229– 242. 10.1111/tra.12549 29364559 PMC5888202 · DOI
  44. [45]Wali G, Sutharsan R, Fan Y, Stewart R, Velasquez JT, Sue CM, et al Mechanism of impaired microtubule-dependent peroxisome trafficking and oxidative stress in SPAST-mutated cells from patients with Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 27004 10.1038/srep27004 27229699 PMC4882512 · DOI
  45. [46]Lin C, Schuster M, Guimaraes SC, Ashwin P, Schrader M, Metz J, et al Active diffusion and microtubule-based transport oppose myosin forces to position organelles in cells. Nat Commun. 2016; 7: 11814 10.1038/ncomms11814 27251117 PMC4895713 · DOI
  46. [47]Woolfson DN, Bartlett GJ, Bruning M, Thomson AR. New currency for old rope: from coiled-coil assemblies to α-helical barrels. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2012; 22: 432– 441. 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.03.002 22445228 · DOI
  47. [48]Teuling E, Ahmed S, Haasdijk E, Demmers J, Steinmetz MO, Akhmanova A, et al Motor neuron disease-associated mutant vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein (VAP) B recruits wild-type VAPs into endoplasmic reticulum-derived tubular aggregates. J Neurosci. 2007; 27: 9801– 9815. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2661-07.2007 17804640 PMC6672975 · DOI
  48. [49]Yue F, Cheng Y, Breschi A, Vierstra J, Wu W, Ryba T, et al A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genome. Nature. 2014; 515: 355– 364. 10.1038/nature13992 25409824 PMC4266106 · DOI · Paper page
  49. [50]Stoica R, De Vos KJ, Paillusson S, Mueller S, Sancho RM, Lau K-F, et al ER–mitochondria associations are regulated by the VAPB–PTPIP51 interaction and are disrupted by ALS/FTD-associated TDP-43. Nat Commun. 2014; 5: 3996 10.1038/ncomms4996 24893131 PMC4046113 · DOI
  50. [51]Brobeil A, Kämmerer F, Tag C, Steger K, Gattenlöhner S, Wimmer M. PTPIP51—A New RelA-tionship with the NFκB Signaling Pathway. Biomolecules. 2015; 5: 485– 504. 10.3390/biom5020485 25893721 PMC4496682 · DOI
  51. [53]Huttlin EL, Jedrychowski MP, Elias JE, Goswami T, Rad R, Beausoleil SA, et al A tissue-specific atlas of mouse protein phosphorylation and expression. Cell. 2010; 143: 1174– 1189. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.001 21183079 PMC3035969 · DOI · Paper page
  52. [54]Cohen Y, Klug YA, Dimitrov L, Erez Z, Chuartzman SG, Elinger D, et al Peroxisomes are juxtaposed to strategic sites on mitochondria. Mol Biosyst. 2014; 10: 1742– 1748. 10.1039/c4mb00001c 24722918 · DOI · Paper page
  53. [55]Lismont C, Nordgren M, Van Veldhoven PP, Fransen M. Redox interplay between mitochondria and peroxisomes. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2015; 3: 35 10.3389/fcell.2015.00035 26075204 PMC4444963 · DOI · Paper page
  54. [56]Shai N, Yifrach E, van Roermund CWT, Cohen N, Bibi C, Ijlst L, et al Systematic mapping of contact sites reveals tethers and a function for the peroxisome-mitochondria contact. Nat Commun. 2018; 9: 1761 10.1038/s41467-018-03957-8 29720625 PMC5932058 · DOI · Paper page
  55. [57]Kleinecke S, Richert S, de Hoz L, Brügger B, Kungl T, Asadollahi E, et al Peroxisomal dysfunctions cause lysosomal storage and axonal Kv1 channel redistribution in peripheral neuropathy. Elife. 2017; 6: e23332 10.7554/eLife.23332 28470148 PMC5417850 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Metz, J., Costello, J. L., Passmore, J., Schrader, M., Schultz, C., & Islinger, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Islinger, Markus
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2018-12-27
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
e0209507
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2907673292
Cited by
24
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (397476530, D10043030)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/K006231/1, BB/N01541X/1)
  • Welcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Award (WT097835MF, WT105618MA)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
Keywords
peroxisomes, VAPB, mitochondrial motility, neuronal polarity, neurites, hippocampal neurons
MeSH terms
Intravital Microscopy, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Embryo, Mammalian, Endoplasmic Reticulum, Female, Hippocampus, Membrane Proteins, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Microscopy, Confocal, Peroxisomes, Vesicular Transport Proteins, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Mitochondrial Membranes, Mice, Primary Cell Culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review