Attendance and compliance with an exercise program during localized breast cancer treatment in a randomized controlled trial: The PACT study
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Maintaining high adherence rates (session attendance and compliance) in exercise programs during breast cancer treatment can be challenging. We aimed to identify adherence rates and predictors to an exercise program during adjuvant breast cancer treatment. METHODS: Ninety-two patients with localized breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy were randomly assigned to an 18-week supervised moderate-to-high intensity aerobic and resistance exercise program, including two 1-hour sessions/week. Additionally, participants were asked to be physically active for at least 30 minutes/day on at least three other days. We report median percentages for attendance, compliance with the prescribed duration and intensity of aerobic and muscle strength exercises, and the exercise advice given. Predictors included in univariate and multivariable linear regression models were demographical, tumor- and treatment-related factors, constructs of the theory of planned behavior, psychological and physical factors. RESULTS: Patients attended 83% (interquartile range: 69-91%) of the supervised sessions. Compliance with the duration of aerobic exercise, high-intensity aerobic exercise (cycling at the ventilatory threshold), muscle strength exercises and the exercise advice were 88%(64-97%), 50%(22-82%), 84%(65-94%) and 61%(33%-79%), respectively. Education, radiotherapy, BMI and physical fatigue were important predictors of adherence to supervised exercise. Beliefs about planned behaviors were important predictors, especially for compliance with the exercise advice. CONCLUSIONS: Attendance to and compliance with an 18-week aerobic and strength exercise program were high. The lowest compliance was found for high-intensity supervised aerobic exercise. The identified predictors should be considered when designing or adapting exercise programs for patients with localized breast cancer to increase adherence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN43801571 Dutch Trial Register NTR2138.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Educational level is a significant predictor for exercise compliance in cancer patients.
“Since educational level was found to be a significant predictor for exercise compliance in cancer patients [51]”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 63
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [30]Dohoney P., Chrmoniak JA, Lemire D, Abadie B.R., Kovacs C. Prediction of one repetition maximum (1-RM) strength from a 4–6 RM and a 7–10 RM sumaximal strength test in healthy young adult males. Official Journal of the American Society of Exercise Physiologists 2002; 5(3): 54– 9.
- Authors
- Witlox, L., Velthuis, M. J., Boer, J. H., Steins Bisschop, C. N., Wall, E. V. D., Meulen, W. J. T. M. V. D., Schröder, C. D., Peeters, P. H. M., & May, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Velthuis, Miranda J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2019-05-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e0215517
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6505930
- OpenAlex
- W2944390263
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- ZonMw (171002202)
- KWF Kankerbestrijding (UU 2009-4473)
- Dutch Pink Ribbon Foundation (2011.WO02.C100)
- Stichting Vrienden Integrale Oncologische Zorg (2015)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- breast cancer, exercise adherence, supervised exercise, chemotherapy, aerobic exercise, resistance training, high-intensity aerobic exercise, theory of planned behavior, predictors of adherence, physical fatigue, radiotherapy, body mass index, exercise recommendations
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Antineoplastic Agents, Breast Neoplasms, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Linear Models, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review