Cited by 213Retinal Imaging and AnalysisGlaucoma and retinal disordersAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A feature agnostic approach for glaucoma detection in OCT volumes

Open access

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) based measurements of retinal layer thickness, such as the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and the ganglion cell with inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) are commonly employed for the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma. Previously, machine learning techniques have relied on segmentation-based imaging features such as the peripapillary RNFL thickness and the cup-to-disc ratio. Here, we propose a deep learning technique that classifies eyes as healthy or glaucomatous directly from raw, unsegmented OCT volumes of the optic nerve head (ONH) using a 3D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). We compared the accuracy of this technique with various feature-based machine learning algorithms and demonstrated the superiority of the proposed deep learning based method. Logistic regression was found to be the best performing classical machine learning technique with an AUC of 0.89. In direct comparison, the deep learning approach achieved a substantially higher AUC of 0.94 with the additional advantage of providing insight into which regions of an OCT volume are important for glaucoma detection. Computing Class Activation Maps (CAM), we found that the CNN identified neuroretinal rim and optic disc cupping as well as the lamina cribrosa (LC) and its surrounding areas as the regions significantly associated with the glaucoma classification. These regions anatomically correspond to the well established and commonly used clinical markers for glaucoma diagnosis such as increased cup volume, cup diameter, and neuroretinal rim thinning at the superior and inferior segments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0219126

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The combination of pruning and fine-tuning succeeds in suppressing, even eliminating the effects of the backdoors.

    “The combination of pruning and fine-tuning succeeds in suppressing, even eliminating the effects of the backdoors.”

    From A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [175]

    The Methods section describes optimizing and training a CNN for glaucoma detection, and the Conclusions discuss its accuracy on OCT scans. Searches for pruning, fine-tuning, backdoors, and removal of malicious behavior found no passage addressing the claimed defense. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. D Huang, 1991, Optical coherence tomography, science, 254, 1178, 10.1126/science.1957169 · DOI
  2. FA Medeiros, 2009, Detection of glaucoma progression with stratus OCT retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 50, 5741, 10.1167/iovs.09-3715 · DOI
  3. KA Lucy, 2016, Structural and functional evaluations for the early detection of glaucoma, Expert review of ophthalmology, 11, 367, 10.1080/17469899.2016.1229599 · DOI
  4. A Krizhevsky, 2012, Advances in neural information processing systems, 1097
  5. ML Huang, 2005, Development and comparison of automated classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using Stratus optical coherence tomography, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 46, 4121, 10.1167/iovs.05-0069 · DOI
  6. FR Silva, 2013, Sensitivity and specificity of machine learning classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using Spectral Domain OCT and standard automated perimetry, Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia, 76, 170, 10.1590/S0004-27492013000300008 · DOI
  7. L Breiman, 2001, Random forests, Machine learning, 45, 5, 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
  8. JS Kim, 2009, Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measurement reproducibility improved with spectral domain optical coherence tomography, British Journal of Ophthalmology, 93, 1057, 10.1136/bjo.2009.157875 · DOI
  9. H Muhammad, 2017, Hybrid Deep Learning on Single Wide-field Optical Coherence tomography Scans Accurately Classifies Glaucoma Suspects, Journal of glaucoma, 26, 1086, 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000765 · DOI
  10. P Asman, 1992, Glaucoma Hemifield Test, Archives of Ophthalmology, 110, 812, 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080180084033 · DOI
  11. F Pedregosa, 2011, Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python, Journal of machine learning research, 12, 2825
  12. DR Cox, 1958, The regression analysis of binary sequences, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological), 215, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1958.tb00292.x · DOI
  13. B Scholkopf, 2001, Learning with kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond, 10.7551/mitpress/4175.001.0001 · DOI
  14. A Natekin, 2013, Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial, Frontiers in neurorobotics, 7, 21, 10.3389/fnbot.2013.00021 · DOI · Paper page
  15. P Geurts, 2006, Extremely randomized trees, Machine learning, 63, 3, 10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 · DOI · Paper page
  16. B Zhou, 2015, Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization, CoRR
  17. Springenberg JT, Dosovitskiy A, Brox T, Riedmiller M. Striving for simplicity: The all convolutional net. arXiv preprint arXiv:14126806. 2014;.
  18. S Ruder, 2016, An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms, CoRR
  19. S Maetschke, 2017, nuts-flow/ml: data pre-processing for deep learning, CoRR
  20. Zhang H, Cisse M, Dauphin YN, Lopez-Paz D. mixup: Beyond empirical risk minimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:171009412. 2017;.
  21. JC Downs, 2017, Lamina cribrosa in glaucoma, Current opinion in ophthalmology, 28, 113, 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000354 · DOI
  22. RY Abe, 2015, Lamina cribrosa in glaucoma: Diagnosis and monitoring, Current ophthalmology reports, 3, 74, 10.1007/s40135-015-0067-7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Maetschke, S., Antony, B., Ishikawa, H., Wollstein, G., Schuman, J., & Garnavi, R.
Affiliations
  • IBM Research - Australia (AU)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
Maetschke, Stefan
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2019-07-01
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
e0219126
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884563238
Cited by
213
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 12
FWCI
18.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
glaucoma detection, optical coherence tomography, optic nerve head, 3D convolutional neural networks, class activation maps, neuroretinal rim, lamina cribrosa, optic disc cupping, retinal nerve fiber layer, ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer, retinal layer thickness
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Female, Glaucoma, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Optic Disk, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Logistic Models, Neural Networks, Computer, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review