CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22Animal testing and alternativesStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

Correction: A standardised framework to identify optimal animal models for efficacy assessment in drug development

Open access
Ferreira, Guilherme S., Veening-Griffioen, Désirée H., Boon, Wouter P. C., Moors, Ellen H. M., Gispen-de Wied, Christine C., Schellekens, Huub, van Meer, Peter J. K.·2019·PLOS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0220325
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218014.].

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0220325

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In much of the academic literature, important model features are chosen post hoc by the authors and not prospectively by an independent third party with expertise in the therapeutic problem at hand.

    “But even here there is a common problem in much of the academic literature: the important model features are chosen post hoc by the authors and not prospectively by an independent third party that has expertise in the therapeutic problem at hand10.”

    From Performance assessment and economic analysis of a human Liver-Chip for predictive toxicology (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferreira, G. S., Veening-Griffioen, D. H., Boon, W. P. C., Moors, E. H. M., Gispen-de Wied, C. C., Schellekens, H., & van Meer, P. J. K.
ORCID
Venue
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2019-07-22
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
e0220325
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0220325
OpenAlex
W4235921548
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Keywords
animal models, drug efficacy evaluation, drug development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review