Cited by 58Ovarian function and disordersEndometriosis Research and TreatmentReproductive Health and Technologies

Awareness of polycystic ovary syndrome among obstetrician-gynecologists and endocrinologists in Northern Europe

Open access
Piltonen, Terhi T., Ruokojärvi, Maria, Karro, Helle, Kujanpää, Linda, Morin-Papunen, Laure, Tapanainen, Juha S., Stener-Victorin, Elisabet, Sundrström-Poromaa, Inger +11 more·2019·PLOS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To date, little is known about differences in the knowledge, diagnosis making and treatment strategies of health care providers regarding polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) across different disciplines in countries with similar health care systems. To inform guideline translation, we aimed to study physician reported awareness, diagnosis and management of PCOS and to explore differences between medical disciplines in the Nordic countries and Estonia. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted among 382 endocrinologists and obstetrician-gynaecologists in the Nordic countries and Estonia in 2015-2016. Of the participating physicians, 43% resided in Finland, 18% in Denmark, 16% in Norway, 13% in Estonia, and 10% in Sweden or Iceland, and 75% were obstetrician-gynaecologists. Multivariable logistic regression models were run to identify health care provider characteristics for awareness, diagnosis and treatment of PCOS. RESULTS: Clinical features, lifestyle management and comorbidity were commonly recognized in women with PCOS, while impairment in psychosocial wellbeing was not well acknowledged. Over two-thirds of the physicians used the Rotterdam diagnostic criteria for PCOS. Medical endocrinologists more often recommended lifestyle management (OR = 3.6, CI 1.6-8.1) or metformin (OR = 5.0, CI 2.5-10.2), but less frequently OCP (OR = 0.5, CI 0.2-0.9) for non-fertility concerns than general obstetrician-gynaecologists. The physicians aged <35 years were 2.2 times (95% CI 1.1-4.3) more likely than older physicians to recommend lifestyle management for patients with PCOS for fertility concerns. Physicians aged 46-55 years were less likely to recommend oral contraceptive pills (OCP) for patients with PCOS than physicians aged >56 (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8). CONCLUSION: Despite well-organized healthcare, awareness, diagnosis and management of PCOS is suboptimal, especially in relation to psychosocial comorbidities, among physicians in the Nordic countries and Estonia. Physicians need more education on PCOS and evidence-based information on Rotterdam diagnostic criteria, psychosocial features and treatment of PCOS, with the recently published international PCOS guideline well needed and welcomed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0226074

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reported gaps in knowledge among health professionals are contributing to diagnostic delays and variations in care, perpetuating patient dissatisfaction and unmet information needs.

    “Reported gaps in knowledge among health professionals [11,12,13,14] are contributing to diagnostic delays and variations in the care provided, perpetuating patient dissatisfaction and unmet information needs [15,16,17,18].”

    From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and the Internet of Things: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion (Conclusions; Main findings, page unavailable) reports gaps in physicians’ PCOS knowledge and inconsistent diagnosis and management across physician groups, supporting the knowledge-gap and variation-in-care portions. It does not establish that those gaps cause diagnostic delays. The citing sentence attaches separate citations to patient dissatisfaction and unmet information needs, so those outcomes are not assessed against this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 58

Authors
Piltonen, T. T., Ruokojärvi, M., Karro, H., Kujanpää, L., Morin-Papunen, L., Tapanainen, J. S., Stener-Victorin, E., Sundrström-Poromaa, I., Hirschberg, A. L., Ravn, P., Glintborg, D., Mellembakken, J. R., Steingrimsdottir, T., Gibson-Helm, M., Vanky, E., Andersen, M., Arffman, R. K., Teede, H., & Falah-Hassani, K.
Affiliations
  • Oulu University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Tartu (EE)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Odense University Hospital (DK)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Piltonen, Terhi T.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2019-12-26
Volume
14
Issue
12
Pages
e0226074
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2997551078
Cited by
58
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Hirsla (Landspítali University Hospital) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Victoria University of Wellington
Funders
  • Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö
  • Academy of Finland (321763)
  • Suomen Lääketieteen Säätiö
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, physician awareness, PCOS diagnosis, PCOS management, lifestyle management, metformin, oral contraceptives, psychosocial comorbidity, obstetricians and gynecologists, endocrinologists, physician age, Northern Europe, Estonia, Finland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Iceland, physician training needs
MeSH terms
Endocrinologists, Adult, Contraceptives, Oral, Cross-Sectional Studies, Europe, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Physicians, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Psychotherapy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review