Multimodal mental health analysis in social media
Open accessAbstract
Depression is a major public health concern in the U.S. and globally. While successful early identification and treatment can lead to many positive health and behavioral outcomes, depression, remains undiagnosed, untreated or undertreated due to several reasons, including denial of the illness as well as cultural and social stigma. With the ubiquity of social media platforms, millions of people are now sharing their online persona by expressing their thoughts, moods, emotions, and even their daily struggles with mental health on social media. Unlike traditional observational cohort studies conducted through questionnaires and self-reported surveys, we explore the reliable detection of depressive symptoms from tweets obtained, unobtrusively. Particularly, we examine and exploit multimodal big (social) data to discern depressive behaviors using a wide variety of features including individual-level demographics. By developing a multimodal framework and employing statistical techniques to fuse heterogeneous sets of features obtained through the processing of visual, textual, and user interaction data, we significantly enhance the current state-of-the-art approaches for identifying depressed individuals on Twitter (improving the average F1-Score by 5 percent) as well as facilitate demographic inferences from social media. Besides providing insights into the relationship between demographics and mental health, our research assists in the design of a new breed of demographic-aware health interventions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are various ethical concerns, including privacy and security issues and risks of social discrimination.
“In addition, there are various ethical concerns, including privacy and security issues and risks of social discrimination.54”
From Digital health technologies and major depressive disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [54]
It is difficult to integrate patient information in a clinically relevant manner due to technical complexities in processing and analyzing data generated from multidimensional data sets and/or using artificial intelligence (AI) modeling.
“It is difficult to integrate patient information in a clinically relevant manner due to technical complexities in processing and analyzing data generated from multidimensional data sets and/or using artificial intelligence (AI) modeling.54”
From Digital health technologies and major depressive disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [54]
There is an increasing need for more personalized approaches to monitor and treat depression, but this is associated with several challenges.
“There is an increasing need for more personalized approaches to monitor and treat depression, but this is associated with several challenges.54”
From Digital health technologies and major depressive disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [54]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 106 · Cited by 133
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [34]Preotiuc-Pietro D, Eichstaedt J, Park G, Sap M, Smith L, Tobolsky V, et al. The role of personality, age and gender in tweeting about mental illnesses. In: NAACL HLT; 2015.
- [44]Yazdavar AH, Ebrahimi M, Salim N. Fuzzy based implicit sentiment analysis on quantitative sentences. arXiv preprint arXiv:170100798. 2017;.
- [65]Mejova Y, Haddadi H, Noulas A, Weber I. # foodporn: Obesity patterns in culinary interactions. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on digital health 2015. ACM; 2015. p. 51–58.
- [110]Nadeem M. Identifying depression on Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:160707384. 2016;.
- Authors
- Yazdavar, A. H., Mahdavinejad, M. S., Bajaj, G., Romine, W., Sheth, A., Monadjemi, A. H., Thirunarayan, K., Meddar, J. M., Myers, A., Pathak, J., & Hitzler, P.
- Affiliations
- Kansas State University (US)
- Wright State University (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yazdavar, Amir Hossein
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2020-04-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e0226248
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7147779
- OpenAlex
- W3015928967
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 19.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CORE Scholar (Wright State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Journal of Bioresource Management (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- CORE Scholar (Wright State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (7R01MH105384-02)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- depression detection, depressive symptoms, Twitter, multimodal fusion, social media and mental health, demographic inference, user interaction data, visual features, text features, stigma
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Young Adult, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review