Cited by 18Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsHernia repair and managementUterine Myomas and Treatments

Risk factors for vaginal mesh erosion after sacrocolpopexy in Korean women

Open access
Kim, Tae Yeon, Jeon, Myung Jae·2020·PLOS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although sacrocolpopexy (SCP) can provide durable apical support, the use of mesh may give rise to various complications, including vaginal mesh erosion. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for vaginal mesh erosion after SCP in Korean women. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 363 women who underwent SCP with type 1 polypropylene mesh. They were evaluated at 1, 4, and 12 months after surgery and then annually thereafter with respect to anatomy and complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazard model were performed to identify the risk factors for mesh erosion. RESULTS: During the median 2-year follow-up period, vaginal mesh erosion was found in 29 women (8.0%). Among them, 19 (65.5%) required surgical correction. Estrogenic status was the only independent risk factor for mesh erosion. The risk for mesh erosion was 4.5 times higher in premenopausal women than in menopausal women not on estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) (95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.9-10.9, p<0.01). Menopausal women on ERT also had an increased risk, with a statistically marginal significance (hazard ratio 2.5, 95% CI 0.9-6.6; p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Premenopausal or menopausal women on ERT are at high risk for mesh erosion after SCP with type 1 polypropylene mesh, and two-thirds of mesh erosion cases require reoperation. This information should be incorporated into patient counseling and treatment decisions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0228566

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 18

Authors
Kim, T. Y., & Jeon, M. J.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Jeon, Myung Jae
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2020-02-10
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
e0228566
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005919661
Cited by
18
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
vaginal mesh erosion, sacrocolpopexy, polypropylene mesh, risk factors, estrogen replacement therapy, menopause, premenopausal women, pelvic organ prolapse, reoperation, Korean women
MeSH terms
Aged, Decision Making, Estrogens, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Menopause, Middle Aged, Polypropylenes, Postoperative Complications, Postoperative Period, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Surgical Mesh, Time Factors, Uterine Prolapse, Vagina, Premenopause, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Republic of Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review