Cited by 3Migration, Identity, and HealthMigration, Health and TraumaCultural Competency in Health Care

Representation of patients with a migration background in studies on antithrombotic treatment. An analysis of recruitment data from a cluster randomized controlled trial

Open access
Mergenthal, Karola, Siebenhofer, Andrea, Ulrich, Lisa-R., Guethlin, Corina, Gerlach, Ferdinand M., Petersen, Juliana J.·2020·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The health status, health awareness and health behavior of persons with a migration background often differ from the autochthonous population. Little is known about the proportion of patients with a migration background (PMB) that participate in primary care studies on oral antithrombotic treatment (OAT) in Germany, and whether the quality of their antithrombotic care differs from patients without a migration background. The aim of this paper was to use the results of a cluster-randomized controlled trial (PICANT) to determine the proportion of PMB at different stages of recruitment, and to compare the results in terms of sociodemographic characteristics and antithrombotic treatment. METHODS: This study used screening and baseline data from the PICANT trial on oral anticoagulation management in GP practices. For this analysis, we determined the proportion of PMB during the recruitment period at stage 1 (screening of potentially eligible patients), stage 2 (eligible patients invited to participate in the trial), and stage 3 (assessment of baseline characteristics of patients participating in the PICANT trial). In addition, we compared patients in terms of sociodemographic characteristics and quality of anticoagulant treatment. Statistical analysis comprised descriptive and bivariate analyses. RESULTS: The proportion of PMB at each recruitment stage declined from 9.1% at stage 1 to 7.9% at stage 2 and 7.3% at stage 3). A lack of German language skills led to the exclusion of half the otherwise eligible PMB. At stages 1 and 3, PMB were younger (stage 1: 70.7 vs. 75.0 years, p<0.001; stage 3: 70.2 vs. 73.5 years, p = 0.013), but did not differ in terms of gender. The quality of their anticoagulant care was comparable (100.0% vs. 99.1% were receiving appropriate OAT, 94.4% vs. 95.7% took phenprocoumon, or warfarin, and the most recent INR measurement of 60.8% vs. 69.3% was within their individual INR range). CONCLUSIONS: In the potentially eligible population and among participants at baseline, the quality of anticoagulant care was high in all groups of patients, which is reassuring. To enable the inclusion of more PMB, future primary care research on OAT in Germany should address how best to overcome language barriers. This will be challenging, particularly because the heterogeneity of PMB means the resulting sample sizes for each specific language group are small. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN41847489.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0230297

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Present-day challenges such as language barriers, cultural differences and a lack of cultural competence can make it difficult for researchers to rebuild trust and establish clear communication with potential participants.

    “Beyond these historical issues, present-day challenges such as language barriers, cultural differences and a lack of cultural competence can make it difficult for researchers to effectively rebuild trust and establish clear communication with potential participants [14–17].”

    From Enablers and barriers of clinical trial participation in adult patients from minority ethnic groups: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Discussion reports that lack of German language skills excluded many otherwise eligible patients and recommends interpreters or translated questionnaires, supporting the language-barrier and communication aspects. The Introduction recommends culturally diverse research staff, but the paper does not establish that cultural differences or a lack of cultural competence impede researchers’ efforts to rebuild trust. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a German study, a correlation emerged between the trial phase and the migration status of participants; the proportion of migrant patients declined at each subsequent recruitment stage, indicating that patients with a migrant status were more likely to withdraw from trials.

    “Finally, in a German study, a correlation emerged between the trial phase and the migration status of participants. The proportion of migrant patients declined at each subsequent recruitment stage, indicating that patients with a migrant status were more likely to withdraw from trials [16].”

    From Enablers and barriers of clinical trial participation in adult patients from minority ethnic groups: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [16]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a German study, 8.5% of eligible patients who declined participation had a migrant background, with 20% of these patients citing a lack of German language skills as the reason for declining.

    “Meanwhile, in a German study, 8.5% of eligible patients who declined participation had a migrant background, with 20% of these patients citing a lack of German language skills as the reason for declining [16].”
  • The topic of patients withdrawing from clinical trials was scarcely discussed in the reviewed papers; only 4 studies explored this issue in African American and migrant groups.

    “The topic of patients withdrawing from clinical trials was scarcely discussed in the reviewed papers; only 4 studies explored this issue in African American and migrant groups [16, 34, 40, 46].”

    From Enablers and barriers of clinical trial participation in adult patients from minority ethnic groups: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Materials and methods (Data collection) and Results (Reasons for non-participation of eligible patients) sections examine whether invited patients joined the trial and why some did not. They do not address patients withdrawing after enrollment. The paper also does not establish the citing document’s count of four studies; searches for withdrawal and dropout found no decisive passage. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 3

Authors
Mergenthal, K., Siebenhofer, A., Ulrich, L.-R., Guethlin, C., Gerlach, F. M., & Petersen, J. J.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Siebenhofer, Andrea
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2020-03-16
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
e0230297
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011034724
Cited by
3
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (16PGF0036)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Identity, and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
anticoagulation, clinical trial participation, language barriers, phenprocoumon, warfarin, INR monitoring, primary care research, ethnic minorities, sociodemographic factors, health disparities, Germany, trial exclusion criteria
MeSH terms
Aged, Anticoagulants, Demography, Female, Fibrinolytic Agents, Humans, Male, Patient Selection, Human Migration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review