Cited by 298Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPain Management and Opioid Use

Retention of patients in opioid substitution treatment: A systematic review

Open access
O’Connor, Aisling Máire, Cousins, Gráinne, Durand, Louise, Barry, Joe, Boland, Fiona·2020·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retention in opioid substitution (OST) treatment is associated with substantial reductions in all cause and overdose mortality. This systematic review aims to identify both protective factors supporting retention in OST, and risk factors for treatment dropout. METHODS: A systematic search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL and Web of Science (January 2001 to October 2019). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies reporting on retention rates and factors associated with retention in OST were included. Factors associated with treatment retention and dropout were explored according to the Maudsley Addiction Profile. A narrative synthesis is provided. RESULTS: 67 studies were included in this review (4 RCTs and 63 observational cohort studies; N = 294,592), all assessing factors associated with retention in OST or treatment dropout. The median retention rate across observational studies was approximately 57% at 12 months, which fell to 38.4% at three years. Studies included were heterogeneous in nature with respect to treatment setting, type of OST, risk factor assessment, ascertainment of outcome and duration of follow-up. While the presence of such methodological heterogeneity makes it difficult to synthesise results, there is limited evidence to support the influence of a number of factors on retention, including age, substance use, OST drug dose, legal issues, and attitudes to OST. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age, substance use particularly cocaine and heroin use, lower doses of methadone, criminal activity/incarceration, and negative attitudes to MMT appear to be associated with reduced retention in OST. A consensus definition of retention is required to allow for comparability across future studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0232086

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Retention in opioid use disorder treatment is low and decreases most precipitously during the early postpartum period.

    “Even when treatment is initiated, retention in treatment is low, decreasing most precipitously during the early postpartum period [2–6].”

    From Mindful moms: acceptability and impact of co-designed and digitally delivered video meditations for pregnant and parenting women with opioid use disorder (2025) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Discussion’s statement of principal findings reports a median retention rate of approximately 57% at 12 months, falling to 38.4% at three years, supporting the general point that retention is limited. It does not identify the early postpartum period as the time of steepest decline; searches for postpartum and pregnancy did not find a passage addressing that comparison. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 115 · Cited by 298

Authors
O’Connor, A. M., Cousins, G., Durand, L., Barry, J., & Boland, F.
Affiliations
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Cousins, Gráinne
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2020-05-14
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
e0232086
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3024002321
Cited by
298
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (2037E)
  • Health Research Board (HRA-PHR-2015-1088)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
opioid substitution therapy, treatment retention, treatment discontinuation, methadone maintenance treatment, risk factors, protective factors, cocaine use, heroin use, methadone dose, criminal activity, opioid use disorder
MeSH terms
Retention in Care, Humans, Opioid-Related Disorders, Patient Dropouts, Risk Factors, Databases, Factual, Opiate Substitution Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review